Book, Paragraph

 1      I,  11|          defined as aforesaid. A "thesis" is a supposition of some
 2      I,  11|          it is reasonable.~Now a "thesis" also is a problem, though
 3      I,  11|           problem is not always a thesis, inasmuch as some problems
 4      I,  11|           them either way. That a thesis, however, also forms a problem,
 5      I,  11|        the philosophers about the thesis, or that the one or the
 6      I,  11|       themselves, seeing that the thesis is a supposition in conflict
 7      I,  11|          every problem, nor every thesis, should be examined, but
 8     II,  4 |           made more familiar, the thesis becomes easier to attack.
 9     II,  5 |           useful in attacking the thesis, and the questioner thereupon
10     II,  5 |       useful, and relevant to the thesis, without being really so;
11     II,  5 |          induction based upon the thesis and then tries to demolish
12     II,  5 |           no use in attacking the thesis, adding an indication whenever
13     II,  5 |        and sometimes the original thesis, is the easier to demolish.~
14     II,  7 |           useful in attacking the thesis.~Moreover, if the accident
15     II,  8 | contradiction of the terms of the thesis is a method convertible
16     II,  8 |      contraries of S and P in the thesis, and see if the contrary
17     II,  9 |         forms of the terms in the thesis, both in demolishing and
18   VIII,  3 |       will be giving the original thesis credence on the strength
19   VIII,  5 |         matter for ourselves.~The thesis laid down by the answerer
20   VIII,  9 |       Before maintaining either a thesis or a definition the answerer
21   VIII,  14|    arguments relating to the same thesis and range them side by side: