Book, Paragraph

 1      I,  14|      e.g. "Is the knowledge of opposites the same or not?"; while
 2      I,  14|         E.g. "The knowledge of opposites is the same"; next, "The
 3     II,  2 |     said that the knowledge of opposites is the same, you should
 4     II,  2 |   whether it be so of relative opposites and of contraries and of
 5    III,  6 |        that are drawn from the opposites and co-ordinates and inflexions
 6      V,  6 |      of view of the respective opposites, and first (a) from that
 7      V,  6 |      point of view of relative opposites and see, for destructive
 8      V,  6 |        also in the case of its opposites, just as has been laid down
 9     VI,  4 |    g.i. good through evil: for opposites are always simultaneous
10     VI,  7 |        of identical things the opposites, too, are identical, and
11    VII,  1 | inflexions and coordinates and opposites. For if justice be the same
12    VII,  1 |      too, in the case of their opposites: for if two things be the
13    VII,  1 |      things be the same, their opposites also will be the same, in
14    VII,  3 |       the contraries and other opposites of the thing, surveying
15    VII,  3 |     differentiae predicated of opposites are either contrary to,
16   VIII,  1 |      not of contraries, but of opposites: for, if he grants this,
17   VIII,  1 |     seeing that contraries are opposites; if he does not, one should
18   VIII,  8 |     for omitting to assert the opposites of these views. If, then,
19   VIII,  13|    claim that the knowledge of opposites in general is one: for then
20   VIII,  13|       even without begging the opposites in so many words, he were