Book, Paragraph

 1     II,  1 |    grammar". For none of these attributes can possibly belong or not
 2     II,  4 |    order to show that contrary attributes belong to the same thing,
 3     II,  4 |      to the genus: for all the attributes that belong to the species
 4     II,  4 |      no necessity that all the attributes that belong to the genus
 5     II,  4 |      but not so "man". All the attributes, on the other hand, that
 6     II,  4 |        fallacious; for all the attributes which do not belong to the
 7     II,  11|     also, in the case of other attributes. The rule is not applicable
 8     IV,  1 |       So that neither of these attributes is the genus but an accident,
 9     IV,  1 |      for instance, that of the attributes which go with everything,
10     IV,  6 |  everything: for the number of attributes that follow everything is
11     IV,  6 |        are among the number of attributes that follow everything.
12      V,  1 |       render one apiece of two attributes to each of two things, and
13      V,  3 |        true in the case of any attributes that do not always and necessarily
14      V,  4 |    with Accident: for the same attributes ought either to belong or
15      V,  8 |       the point of view of the attributes that belong in a like manner,
16      V,  8 | differs from the rule based on attributes that belong in a like manner,’
17     VI,  13|      they should have contrary attributes surely seems quite absurd;
18    VII,  3 |    that so and so are the only attributes predicated in that category,
19    VII,  5 |   those relating to accidental attributes apply generally to all the
20    VII,  5 |       reasoning (i.e. that the attributes stated belong, and that