Book, Paragraph

 1     II,  1 |   methods of establishing and overthrowing a view universally are common
 2     II,  1 |       speak of the methods of overthrowing a view universally, because
 3     II,  2 |      for establishing and for overthrowing a view: e.g. you should
 4     II,  3 |   both of establishing and of overthrowing a view. For if we want to
 5     II,  3 |     senses: whereas if we are overthrowing a statement, we shall show
 6     II,  3 |    both senses. Of course, in overthrowing a statement there is no
 7     II,  4 |      for establishing and for overthrowing a view.~In order to show
 8     II,  4 |   other hand, for purposes of overthrowing a view, the former argument
 9     II,  4 |       both purposes, both for overthrowing and for establishing a view:
10     II,  7 |        For purposes, then, of overthrowing a view, as has been said,
11     II,  11|  however, not convertible for overthrowing a view. For if the thing
12     II,  11|    either, for the purpose of overthrowing a predication: for several
13     IV,  2 |     lower.] If, then, you are overthrowing a view, follow the rule
14     IV,  2 |    essence. If, then, you are overthrowing a view, it is useful to
15     IV,  6 |  greater and less degrees: if overthrowing a view, see whether the
16    VII,  5 |   peculiar to the subject. In overthrowing a view, on the other hand,
17    VII,  5 | proposition in the process of overthrowing the definition. For merely
18    VII,  5 |       in every case, while of overthrowing it there are two ways: for
19    VII,  5 |       to be shown; whereas in overthrowing it, it is enough to show