Book, Paragraph

 1     II,  2 |              define it so in so many words, saying (e.g.) that "Justice
 2     II,  9 |              It is usually held that words when used in their inflected
 3      V,  2 |         second is, if a man replaces words by their definitions, as
 4     VI,  3 |              exact equivalent of the words "conation for-the-pleasant",
 5     VI,  3 | contemplation, so that by adding the words "and contemplates" over
 6     VI,  6 |              and we ought to add the words "except they both be subordinate
 7     VI,  6 |             differentia of both. The words "except they both be subordinate
 8     VI,  6 |              to the ambiguity of the words "immune at present from
 9     VI,  10|               So always wherever the words "capable of acting on" or "
10     VI,  11|          whether, in the exchange of words, the sense fails still to
11    VII,  1 |                then, subtracting the words "a half" from each, the
12   VIII,  1 |       propounded directly in so many words. Rather one should soar
13   VIII,  1 |             be formulated in so many words. This is because the coming
14   VIII,  1 |            formulate them in so many words. The premisses, other than
15   VIII,  3 |              better refuse. In other words, in serious inquiry he ought
16   VIII,  7 |            view the one sense of the words, then, if the questioner
17   VIII,  13|         detected when put in so many words; but it is more apt to escape
18   VIII,  13|             the opposites in so many words, he were to beg two premisses