Book, Paragraph

 1      I,  18|            shall get the credit of defining not inappropriately. Definition-mongers
 2     IV,  5 |         the genus "state", e.g. by defining "sensation" as "movement
 3     IV,  5 |           that attends it, e.g. by defining "good temper" as the "control
 4     IV,  5 |            part without detection, defining (e.g.) "animal" as an "animate
 5     IV,  5 |    capacity" or "capable", e.g. by defining a "sophist" or a "slanderer",
 6     IV,  5 |          and differentia as genus, defining (e.g.) astonishment as "
 7     IV,  5 |       which it is an affection, by defining (e.g.) wind as "air in motion".
 8     VI,  5 |          of the things he defines, defining, e.g. justice as a "state
 9     VI,  5 | distributes what is equal": for by defining it so he passes outside
10     VI,  6 |          negation as well, e.g. in defining privations. For "blind"
11     VI,  6 |          primary relation: e.g. by defining "wisdom" as the virtue of "
12     VI,  8 |          added. Likewise, also, in defining the covetous man the quantity
13     VI,  9 |        more than one thing: for in defining knowledge, a man in a sense
14     VI,  9 |         inequality: for then he is defining it through the term which
15     VI,  9 |     definition the very term he is defining; and this becomes clear,
16     VI,  9 |         primarily, e.g. whether in defining "ignorance" a privation
17     VI,  13|             13~See also whether in defining anything a man has defined