Book, Paragraph

 1     VI,  2 |      it is not evident what it defines: just as in the works of
 2     VI,  3 |        Xenocrates, that wisdom defines and contemplates reality:’
 3     VI,  3 | already stated. So also, if he defines "medicine" as "knowledge
 4     VI,  4 |         4~Whether, then, a man defines a thing correctly or incorrectly
 5     VI,  4 |      thing: for clearly he who defines through terms that are prior
 6     VI,  5 |        genera of the things he defines, defining, e.g. justice
 7     VI,  9 |  happens that what the definer defines is in a sense more than
 8     VI,  9 |    knowledge, a man in a sense defines ignorance as well, and likewise
 9     VI,  9 |         Moreover, a man who so defines is bound to use in his definition
10     VI,  11|     the rest of the definition defines the rest of it: if not,
11     VI,  13|       B" or as an "A+B". If he defines it as and B’, the definition
12     VI,  13|       described; for a man who defines in this way seems to assert
13    VII,  3 |        the opposite definition defines that opposite term, the
14    VII,  3 |        two together. Thus if A defines a better than B defines
15    VII,  3 |        defines a better than B defines and B is a definition of
16    VII,  3 |    like B’s to define B, and B defines B, then A too defines a.
17    VII,  3 |        B defines B, then A too defines a. This examination from