| Table of Contents | Words: Alphabetical - Frequency - Inverse - Length - Statistics | Help | IntraText Library | ||
| Alphabetical [« »] proper 11 properly 10 properties 11 property 607 proportion 4 proportional 1 propose 1 | Frequency [« »] 884 if 719 one 689 or 607 property 549 are 494 also 452 then | Aristotle Topics IntraText - Concordances property |
Book, Paragraph
1 I, 4| things, and speak of it as a "property". What we have said, then, 2 I, 4| all told, namely either property or definition or genus or 3 I, 5| what are "definition", "property", "genus", and "accident". 4 I, 5| itself to overthrow it.~A "property" is a predicate which does 5 I, 5| convertibly of it. Thus it is a property of man to-be-capable of 6 I, 5| no one calls anything a "property" which may possibly belong 7 I, 5| actually to be called a property, it will be called not a " 8 I, 5| it will be called not a "property" absolutely, but a "temporary" 9 I, 5| temporary" or a "relative" property: for "being on the right 10 I, 5| hand side" is a temporary property, while "two-footed" is in 11 I, 5| point of fact ascribed as a property in certain relations; e.g. 12 I, 5| relations; e.g. it is a property of man relatively to a horse 13 I, 5| neither a definition nor a property nor a genus yet belongs 14 I, 5| definition" and "genus" and "property" are, whereas the second 15 I, 5| a temporary or relative property. Thus the sitting posture 16 I, 5| but will be a temporary property, whenever a man is the only 17 I, 5| one sitting, it is still a property relatively to those who 18 I, 5| relative and a temporary property; but a property absolutely 19 I, 5| temporary property; but a property absolutely it will never 20 I, 6| made in criticism of a "property" and "genus" and "accident" 21 I, 6| do also in the case of a property, or that the genus rendered 22 I, 7| rendered in reference to a property, as when what can acquire 23 I, 8| of something or from its property or from its genus or from 24 I, 8| would be its definition or property, for if it signifies the 25 I, 8| definition; if not, it is a property: for this was what a property 26 I, 8| property: for this was what a property is, viz. what is predicated 27 I, 8| definition or its genus or a property.~ 28 I, 9| the accident and genus and property and definition of anything 29 II, 1| elements "definition" and "property" and "genus" are bound to 30 II, 1| true also in the case of a property; for if "to be capable of 31 II, 2| inflected form, nor yet as its property or as its definition: for 32 II, 2| for the definition and property of a thing belong to it 33 III, 1| to the body. So too the property of the better thing is better 34 III, 1| thing is better than the property of the worse; e.g. the property 35 III, 1| property of the worse; e.g. the property of God than the property 36 III, 1| property of God than the property of man: for whereas in respect 37 IV, 1| questions relating to Genus and Property. These are elements in the 38 IV, 5| thieving other people's property". For none of the aforesaid 39 V, 1| attribute stated is or is not a property, should be examined by the 40 V, 1| following methods:~Any "property" rendered is always either 41 V, 1| e.g. it is an "essential property" of man to be "by nature 42 V, 1| civilized animal": a "relative property" is one like that of the 43 V, 1| other to obey: a "permanent property" is one like the property 44 V, 1| property" is one like the property which belongs to God, of 45 V, 1| living being": a "temporary property" is one like the property 46 V, 1| property" is one like the property which belongs to any particular 47 V, 1| gymnasium.~[The rendering of a property "relatively" gives rise 48 V, 1| the same time render this property of one thing and deny it 49 V, 1| a statement that it is a property of a man, in relation to 50 V, 1| biped: in both ways the property would be upset. If on the 51 V, 1| a statement that it is a property of a man in relation to 52 V, 1| demolished.]~An "essential" property is one which is rendered 53 V, 1| case of man. A "relative" property is one which separates its 54 V, 1| definite thing, as does the property which virtue possesses, 55 V, 1| reasoning faculty. A "permanent" property is one which is true at 56 V, 1| creature. A "temporary" property is one which is true at 57 V, 1| market-place.~To render a property "relatively" to something 58 V, 1| relative. For a relative property gives rise, as we said before, 59 V, 1| essential and a permanent property you can discuss in relation 60 V, 1| with many things: for the property ought to belong to its subject 61 V, 1| with everything else, the property could not have been rendered 62 V, 1| correctly. So a permanent property you should observe in relation 63 V, 1| belong, it will not be a property. On the other hand, about 64 V, 1| hand, about a temporary property we do not inquire further 65 V, 1| The so-called "relative" property, then, should be examined 66 V, 2| 2~First, see whether the property has or has not been rendered 67 V, 2| whether the terms in which the property is stated are not or are 68 V, 2| test is to see whether the property which he renders is altogether 69 V, 2| unintelligible than the subject whose property he has stated: for, if so, 70 V, 2| stated: for, if so, the property will not have been stated 71 V, 2| the object of getting a property constituted is to be intelligible: 72 V, 2| has stated that it is a property of "fire" to "bear a very 73 V, 2| correctly stated to be a property of fire. Another test is 74 V, 2| whether the attribution of A (property) to B (subject) fails to 75 V, 2| For not only should the property be more intelligible than 76 V, 2| happens, its character as a property becomes obscure. Thus (e.g.) 77 V, 2| has stated that it is a property of fire to be "the primary 78 V, 2| correctly stated to be a property of "fire". On the other 79 V, 2| whether the terms in which the property is stated are more intelligible, 80 V, 2| aforesaid ways. For then the property will have been correctly 81 V, 2| possession of sensation" is a property of "animal" has both used 82 V, 2| terms and has rendered the property more intelligible in each 83 V, 2| correctly rendered as a property of "animal".~Next, for destructive 84 V, 2| the terms rendered in the property is used in more than one 85 V, 2| one thing. For then the property will not have been correctly 86 V, 2| a correct statement of a property of "animal". The reason 87 V, 2| expression signifying the property, should not bear more than 88 V, 2| object of rendering the property is that he may understand. 89 V, 2| that those who render a property after this fashion should 90 V, 2| one sense: for then the property will have been correctly 91 V, 2| respect to say that it is a property of fire to be the "body 92 V, 2| of which he renders the property is used in more than one 93 V, 2| which of them it is whose property he is stating: for then 94 V, 2| is stating: for then the property will not have been correctly 95 V, 2| of knowledge about it-no property of the "knowledge of this" 96 V, 2| which of these it is whose property he is rendering. For constructive 97 V, 2| which he is rendering the property avoids bearing many senses 98 V, 2| and simple: for then the property will have been correctly 99 V, 2| be correctly stated as a property of man.~Next, for destructive 100 V, 2| has been repeated in the property. For people often do this 101 V, 2| definitions" as well: but a property to which this has happened 102 V, 2| one were to render, as a property of fire, "the body which 103 V, 2| one were to render, as a property of earth, "the substance 104 V, 2| same term; for then the property will in this respect have 105 V, 2| acquiring knowledge" as a property of man has avoided repeating 106 V, 2| term several times, the property would in this respect have 107 V, 2| whether he has rendered in the property any such term as is a universal 108 V, 2| contemplated, therefore, the property will not have been correctly 109 V, 2| has stated that it is a property of knowledge to be a "conception 110 V, 2| unity", has used in the property a term of that kind, viz. " 111 V, 2| attribute; and therefore the property of knowledge could not have 112 V, 2| something: for then the property will in this respect have 113 V, 2| who has said that it is a property of a "living creature" to " 114 V, 2| correctly stated to be a property of a "living creature" to " 115 V, 2| he renders more than one property of the same thing, without 116 V, 2| more than one: for then the property will not have been correctly 117 V, 2| expression that constitutes the property mentioned: for such an addition 118 V, 2| who has said that it is a property of fire to be "the most 119 V, 2| has rendered more than one property (for each term is a true 120 V, 2| not be a correctly stated property of fire to be "the most 121 V, 2| rendering more than one property of the same thing, and has 122 V, 2| rendered one only: for then the property will in this respect have 123 V, 2| who has said that it is a property of a liquid to be a "body 124 V, 2| shape" has rendered as its property a single character and not 125 V, 2| not several, and so the property of "liquid" would in this 126 V, 3| the actual subject whose property he is rendering, or any 127 V, 3| its species: for then the property will not have been correctly 128 V, 3| object of rendering the property is that people may understand: 129 V, 3| who has said that it is property of "animal" to be "the substance 130 V, 3| species, and therefore the property could not have been correctly 131 V, 3| its species: for then the property will in this respect have 132 V, 3| has stated that it is a property of a living creature to 133 V, 3| therefore in this respect the property of a "living creature" would 134 V, 3| posterior to it: for then the property will not have been correctly 135 V, 3| who has said that it is a property of good to be "the most 136 V, 3| opposite of good, and so the property of good could not have been 137 V, 3| posterior to it: for then the property will in this respect have 138 V, 3| has stated that it is a property of knowledge to be "the 139 V, 3| the subject; and so the property of knowledge would in this 140 V, 3| whether he has rendered as property something that does not 141 V, 3| sometimes ceases to be its property: for then the property will 142 V, 3| its property: for then the property will not have been correctly 143 V, 3| after he has rendered the property it will not be clear whether 144 V, 3| that may fall: and so the property will not be clear. Thus ( 145 V, 3| has stated that it is a property of animal "sometimes to 146 V, 3| still" rendered the kind of property which sometimes is not a 147 V, 3| which sometimes is not a property, and so the property could 148 V, 3| not a property, and so the property could not have been correctly 149 V, 3| necessity must always be a property: for then the property will 150 V, 3| a property: for then the property will have been in this respect 151 V, 3| has stated that it is a property of virtue to be "what makes 152 V, 3| possessor good" has rendered as property something that always follows, 153 V, 3| always follows, and so the property of virtue would in this 154 V, 3| whether in rendering the property of the present time he has 155 V, 3| definite proviso that it is the property of the present time which 156 V, 3| rendering: for else the property will not have been correctly 157 V, 3| for everybody to render as property some attribute that always 158 V, 3| definitely whether it was the property of the present time which 159 V, 3| who has stated it as the property of a particular man "to 160 V, 3| particular man", states the property of the present time, and 161 V, 3| cannot have rendered the property correctly, seeing that he 162 V, 3| whether, in rendering the property of the present time, he 163 V, 3| definite proviso that it is the property of the present time that 164 V, 3| is stating: for then the property will in this respect have 165 V, 3| has said that it is the property of a particular man "to 166 V, 3| his statement, and so the property would have been correctly 167 V, 3| whether he has rendered a property of the kind whose appropriateness 168 V, 3| sensation: for then the property will not have been correctly 169 V, 3| has stated that it is a property of the sun to be "the brightest 170 V, 3| has used in describing the property an expression of that kind, 171 V, 3| sensation; and so the sun’s property could not have been correctly 172 V, 3| whether he has rendered the property of a kind that is not obvious 173 V, 3| necessity: for then the property will in this respect have 174 V, 3| has stated that it is a property of a surface to be "the 175 V, 3| always belongs, and so the property of "surface" would in this 176 V, 3| rendered the definition as a property: for then the property will 177 V, 3| a property: for then the property will not have been correctly 178 V, 3| correctly stated: for the property of a thing ought not to 179 V, 3| has said that it is the property of man to be "a walking, 180 V, 3| biped animal" has rendered a property of man so as to signify 181 V, 3| his essence, and so the property of man could not have been 182 V, 3| other hand, see whether the property which he has rendered forms 183 V, 3| its essence: for then the property will in this respect have 184 V, 3| has stated that it is a property of man to be a "naturally 185 V, 3| animal" has rendered the property so as to be convertible 186 V, 3| its essence, and so the property of man’ would in this respect 187 V, 3| whether he has rendered the property without having placed the 188 V, 3| from other things. Hence a property which is not stated in this 189 V, 3| who has said that it is a property of a living creature to " 190 V, 3| its essence, and so the property of a living creature could 191 V, 3| essence the subject whose property he is rendering, and then 192 V, 3| appends the rest: for then the property will in this respect have 193 V, 3| who has stated that is a property of man to be an "animal 194 V, 3| knowledge", has rendered the property after placing the subject 195 V, 3| its essence, and so the property of "man" would in this respect 196 V, 4| inquiry, then, whether the property has been correctly rendered 197 V, 4| is stated is or is not a property at all, you should examine 198 V, 4| establish absolutely that the property is accurately stated will 199 V, 4| those that constitute it a property at all: accordingly they 200 V, 4| which he has rendered the property, and see (e.g.) if it fails 201 V, 4| particular respect, or to be a property of each of them in respect 202 V, 4| which he has rendered the property: for then what is stated 203 V, 4| then what is stated to be a property will not be a property. 204 V, 4| a property will not be a property. Thus, for example, inasmuch 205 V, 4| misdrawn), it could not be a property of the man of science that 206 V, 4| other hand, see whether the property rendered be true of every 207 V, 4| what is stated not to be a property will be a property. Thus, 208 V, 4| be a property will be a property. Thus, for example, in as 209 V, 4| him qua man, it would be a property of man to be "an animal 210 V, 4| then what is stated to be a property will not be a property. 211 V, 4| a property will not be a property. Thus (e.g.) inasmuch as 212 V, 4| knowledge’ could not be a property of man. For constructive 213 V, 4| what is stated not to be a property will be a property. Thus ( 214 V, 4| be a property will be a property. Thus (e.g.) the predicate " 215 V, 4| having a soul would be a property of "living creature".~Next, 216 V, 4| rendered a subject as a property of that which is described 217 V, 4| has been stated to be a property will not be a property. 218 V, 4| a property will not be a property. Thus (e.g.) inasmuch as 219 V, 4| has rendered "fire" as the property of "the body with the most 220 V, 4| rendered the subject as the property of its predicate, "fire" 221 V, 4| predicate, "fire" could not be a property of "the body with the most 222 V, 4| the subject will not be a property of that which is found in 223 V, 4| the same thing will be the property of a number of things that 224 V, 4| and the subject will be a property of all of these, if any 225 V, 4| these, if any one states the property in this way. For constructive 226 V, 4| found in the subject as a property of the subject: for then 227 V, 4| been stated not to be a property will be a property, if it 228 V, 4| be a property will be a property, if it be predicated only 229 V, 4| has been stated to be the property. Thus (e.g.) he who has 230 V, 4| who has said that it is a property of "earth" to be "specifically 231 V, 4| rendered of the subject as its property something that is said of 232 V, 4| in the manner in which a property is predicated, and so the 233 V, 4| is predicated, and so the property of earth would have been 234 V, 4| see if he has rendered the property as partaken of: for then 235 V, 4| then what is stated to be a property will not be a property. 236 V, 4| a property will not be a property. For an attribute of which 237 V, 4| walking on two feet" is property of man has rendered the 238 V, 4| of man has rendered the property as partaken of, "walking 239 V, 4| two feet" could not be a property of "man". For constructive 240 V, 4| has avoided rendering the property as partaken of, or as showing 241 V, 4| what is stated not to be a property will be a property. Thus ( 242 V, 4| be a property will be a property. Thus (e.g.) he who has 243 V, 4| naturally sentient" is a property of "animal" has rendered 244 V, 4| animal" has rendered the property neither as partaken of nor 245 V, 4| naturally sentient" would be a property of "animal".~Next, for destructive 246 V, 4| destructive purposes, see if the property cannot possibly belong simultaneously, 247 V, 4| then what is stated to be a property will not be a property either 248 V, 4| a property will not be a property either never, or not always. 249 V, 4| market-place" could not be a property of "man" either never, or 250 V, 4| what is stated not to be a property will be a property. Thus ( 251 V, 4| be a property will be a property. Thus (e.g.) the attribute " 252 V, 4| receiving knowledge" would be a property of "man".~Next, for destructive 253 V, 4| same thing fails to be a property of things that are the same 254 V, 4| then what is stated to be a property will not be a property. 255 V, 4| a property will not be a property. Thus, for example, inasmuch 256 V, 4| example, inasmuch as it is no property of a "proper object of pursuit" 257 V, 4| persons", it could not be a property of the "desirable" either 258 V, 4| see if the same thing be a property of something that is the 259 V, 4| then is stated not to be a property will be a property. Thus ( 260 V, 4| be a property will be a property. Thus (e.g.) inasmuch as 261 V, 4| inasmuch as it is called a property of a man, in so far as he 262 V, 4| soul", it would also be a property of a mortal, in so far as 263 V, 4| destructive purposes, see if the property of things that are the same 264 V, 4| same in kind as the alleged property: for then neither will what 265 V, 4| what is stated to be the property of the subject in question. 266 V, 4| and it is not always a property of a horse to stand by its 267 V, 4| initiative, it could not be a property of a man to move by his 268 V, 4| kind as the subject the property that is the same as the 269 V, 4| the same as the alleged property is always true: for then 270 V, 4| what is stated not to be a property will be a property. Thus ( 271 V, 4| be a property will be a property. Thus (e.g.) since it is 272 V, 4| Thus (e.g.) since it is a property of man to be a "walking 273 V, 4| biped," it would also be a property of a bird to be a "flying 274 V, 4| sophistical questioner a property that belongs to one thing 275 V, 4| science, it could not be a property of "science" that it is " 276 V, 5| has been stated to be a property is upset. Thus (e.g.) the 277 V, 5| has said that "biped" is a property of man intends to render 278 V, 5| biped" could not be a property of man: for not every man 279 V, 5| he intends to render the property that naturally belongs, 280 V, 5| his language: for then the property will not be upset in this 281 V, 5| e.g.) he who renders as a property of "man" the phrase "an 282 V, 5| language indicates, the property that belongs by nature, 283 V, 5| that respect not to be a property of man.~Moreover, as regards 284 V, 5| it is a job to render the property of such things. For if you 285 V, 5| things. For if you render a property as belonging to the subject 286 V, 5| renders , coloured’ as the property of "surface", "coloured" 287 V, 5| well as to what things the property is stated to belong. For 288 V, 5| one tries to render as the property of a thing something that 289 V, 5| whether rendered as a property of "surface" or of "body". 290 V, 5| beforehand that he has rendered a property to a thing either because 291 V, 5| because then it will not be a property. For, supposing he renders 292 V, 5| supposing he renders the property to something as being a 293 V, 5| argument" when stated as a property of "science" or of the " 294 V, 5| indicated beforehand that the property belongs because the thing 295 V, 5| something; because then the property will belong to certain other 296 V, 5| to state "life" to be a property of a "particular kind of 297 V, 5| expressly distinguished the property that belongs specifically, 298 V, 5| term of which he states the property: for the superlative belongs 299 V, 5| that if there be, then the property in question will belong 300 V, 5| same attribute will be the property both of the term which has 301 V, 5| is the condition of the property "consisting of most rarefied 302 V, 5| same attribute will be the property of "light" as well: for 303 V, 5| any one else renders a property in this way one should attack 304 V, 5| what manner one states the property at the actual time of making 305 V, 5| has stated a thing as a property of itself: for then what 306 V, 5| has been stated to be a property will not be a property. 307 V, 5| a property will not be a property. For a thing itself always 308 V, 5| shows the essence is not a property but a definition. Thus ( 309 V, 5| said that "becoming" is a property of "beautiful" has rendered 310 V, 5| has rendered the term as a property of itself (for "beautiful" 311 V, 5| becoming" could not be a property of "beautiful". For constructive 312 V, 5| avoided rendering a thing as a property of itself, but has yet stated 313 V, 5| what is stated not to be a property will be a property. Thus 314 V, 5| be a property will be a property. Thus he who has stated " 315 V, 5| animate substance" as a property of "living-creature" has 316 V, 5| stated "living-creature" as a property of itself, but has rendered 317 V, 5| animate substance" would be a property of "living-creature".~Next, 318 V, 5| destructive purposes, if the property of the whole be not true 319 V, 5| has been stated to be the property will not be a property. 320 V, 5| the property will not be a property. In some cases it happens 321 V, 5| sometimes in rendering a property in the case of things that 322 V, 5| who has said that it is a property of the "sea" to be "the 323 V, 5| salt water", has stated the property of something that consists 324 V, 5| salt water’ could not be a property of the "sea". Now take one 325 V, 5| has stated that it is a property of "air" to be "breathable" 326 V, 5| breathable" has stated the property of something that consists 327 V, 5| breathable" could not be a property of "air". For constructive 328 V, 5| it is on the other hand a property of them taken as a collective 329 V, 5| been stated not to be a property will be a property. Thus ( 330 V, 5| be a property will be a property. Thus (e.g.) while it is 331 V, 5| falls downwards, it is a property of the various particular 332 V, 5| so that it would be a property of "earth" "naturally to 333 V, 6| term rendered fails to be a property of the contrary subject. 334 V, 6| contrary of the first be a property of the contrary of the second. 335 V, 6| the highest good" is not a property of "justice", therefore " 336 V, 6| lowest evil" could not be a property of "injustice". For constructive 337 V, 6| see if the contrary is the property of the contrary: for then 338 V, 6| of the first will be the property of the contrary of the second. 339 V, 6| desirable, and "desirable" is a property of "good", "objectionable" 340 V, 6| objectionable" would be a property of "evil".~Secondly (h) 341 V, 6| term rendered fails to be a property of the correlative of the 342 V, 6| correlative of the first be a property of the correlative of the 343 V, 6| while "in excess" is not a property of "double", exceeded’ could 344 V, 6| exceeded’ could not be a property of "half". For constructive 345 V, 6| correlative of the alleged property is a property of the subject’ 346 V, 6| the alleged property is a property of the subject’s correlative: 347 V, 6| correlative of the first will be a property of the correlative of the 348 V, 6| proportion 2:1, while it is a property of "double" to be "in the 349 V, 6| of 2 to 1", it would be a property of "half" to be "in the 350 V, 6| state (X) fails to be a property of the given state (Y): 351 V, 6| the privation (of X) be a property of the privation (of Y). 352 V, 6| privation (of X) be not a property of the given privation ( 353 V, 6| terms of the state (X) be a property of the state (Y). Thus, 354 V, 6| it is not predicated as a property of "deafness" to be a "lack 355 V, 6| neither could it be a property of "hearing" to be a "sensation". 356 V, 6| terms of a state (X) is a property of the given state (Y): 357 V, 6| privation (of X) will be a property of the privation (of Y). 358 V, 6| a privation (of X) be a property of the privation (of Y), 359 V, 6| the state (X) will be a property of the state (Y). Thus ( 360 V, 6| inasmuch as "to see" is a property of "sight", inasmuch as 361 V, 6| failure to see" would be a property of "blindness", inasmuch 362 V, 6| described in terms of it is a property of the subject: for then 363 V, 6| terms of it will not be a property of the subject. Also if, 364 V, 6| described in terms of it is a property of the subject, then the 365 V, 6| terms of it will not be a property of the subject: e.g. inasmuch 366 V, 6| inasmuch as "animate" is a property of "living creature", "inanimate" 367 V, 6| inanimate" could not be a property of "living creature".~Secondly ( 368 V, 6| positive term falls to be a property of the positive subject: 369 V, 6| will the negative term be a property of the negative subject. 370 V, 6| negative term fails to be a property of the negative subject, 371 V, 6| will the positive term be a property of the positive subject. 372 V, 6| inasmuch as "animal" is not a property of "man", neither could " 373 V, 6| could "not-animal" be a property of "not-man". Also if "not-animal" 374 V, 6| not-animal" seems not to be a property of "not-man", neither will " 375 V, 6| neither will "animal" be a property of "man". For constructive 376 V, 6| if the positive term is a property of the positive subject: 377 V, 6| negative term will be a property of the negative subject 378 V, 6| if the negative term be a property of the negative subject, 379 V, 6| the positive will be a property of the positive as well. 380 V, 6| e.g.) inasmuch as it is a property of "not-living being" "not 381 V, 6| to live", it would be a property of "living being" "to live": 382 V, 6| also if it seems to be a property of "living being" "to live", 383 V, 6| it will also seem to be a property of "not-living being" "not 384 V, 6| destructive purposes, if the property rendered is a property of 385 V, 6| the property rendered is a property of the positive subject: 386 V, 6| same term will not be a property of the negative subject 387 V, 6| if the term rendered be a property of the negative subject, 388 V, 6| subject, it will not be a property of the positive. Thus (e.g.) 389 V, 6| inasmuch as "animate" is a property of "living creature", "animate" 390 V, 6| animate" could not be a property of "not-living creature". 391 V, 6| term rendered fails to be a property of the affirmative subject 392 V, 6| affirmative subject it would be a property of the negative. This commonplace 393 V, 6| a positive term is not a property of a negative, or a negative 394 V, 6| positive, does not belong as a property.~Next, look from the point 395 V, 6| members (parallel with the property rendered) be a property 396 V, 6| property rendered) be a property of any of the remaining 397 V, 6| will the term stated be a property of that of which it is stated 398 V, 6| which it is stated to be a property. Thus (e.g.) inasmuch as " 399 V, 6| sensible living being" is not a property of any of the other living 400 V, 6| living being" could not be a property of God. For constructive 401 V, 6| members (parallel with the property rendered) be a property 402 V, 6| property rendered) be a property of each of these co-ordinate 403 V, 6| remaining one too will be a property of that of which it has 404 V, 6| been stated not to be a property. Thus (e.g.) inasmuch as 405 V, 6| e.g.) inasmuch as it is a property of "wisdom" to be essentially " 406 V, 6| this way, it would be a property of "temperance" to be essentially " 407 V, 6| if the inflexion of the property rendered fails to be a property 408 V, 6| property rendered fails to be a property of the inflexion of the 409 V, 6| the other inflexion be a property of the other inflexion. 410 V, 6| as "beautifully" is not a property of "justly", neither could " 411 V, 6| neither could "beautiful" be a property of "just". For constructive 412 V, 6| if the inflexion of the property rendered is a property of 413 V, 6| the property rendered is a property of the inflexion of the 414 V, 6| other inflexion will be a property of the other inflexion. 415 V, 6| as "walking biped" is a property of man, it would also be 416 V, 6| would also be any one’s property "as a man" to be described " 417 V, 6| inflexion of the opposite of the property rendered fails to be the 418 V, 6| rendered fails to be the property of the inflexion of the 419 V, 6| the other opposite be a property of the inflexion of the 420 V, 6| inasmuch as "well" is not a property of "justly", neither could " 421 V, 6| neither could "badly" be a property of "unjustly". For constructive 422 V, 6| inflexion of the opposite of the property originally suggested is 423 V, 6| originally suggested is a property of the inflexion of the 424 V, 6| other opposite will be a property of the inflexion of the 425 V, 6| inasmuch as "best" is a property of "the good", "worst" also 426 V, 6| worst" also will be a property of "the evil".~ 427 V, 7| relation like that of the property rendered fails to be a property 428 V, 7| property rendered fails to be a property of what is in a relation 429 V, 7| like that of the first be a property of what is in a relation 430 V, 7| health, and it is not a property of a doctor to produce health, 431 V, 7| health, it could not be a property of a builder to produce 432 V, 7| relation like that of the property rendered is a property of 433 V, 7| the property rendered is a property of what is in a relation 434 V, 7| that of the first will be a property of what is in a relation 435 V, 7| produce vigour, and it is a property of a trainer to possess 436 V, 7| produce vigour, it would be a property of a doctor to possess the 437 V, 7| two subjects fails to be a property of the subject which is 438 V, 7| related to both subjects be a property of the subject which is 439 V, 7| related to two subjects is the property of the subject which is 440 V, 7| question, then it will not be a property of that of which it has 441 V, 7| has been stated to be a property. (e.g.) inasmuch as prudence 442 V, 7| of them, and it is not a property of prudence to be knowledge 443 V, 7| noble, it could not be a property of prudence to be knowledge 444 V, 7| the other hand, it is a property of prudence to be the knowledge 445 V, 7| noble, it could not be a property of it to be the knowledge 446 V, 7| for the same thing to be a property of more than one subject. 447 V, 7| verb "to be" fails to be a property of the subject qualified 448 V, 7| destruction of the one be a property of the other qualified by 449 V, 7| becoming" the one be a property of the other qualified by 450 V, 7| inasmuch as it is not a property of "man" to be an animal, 451 V, 7| animal, neither could it be a property of becoming a man to become 452 V, 7| destruction of an animal be a property of the destruction of a 453 V, 7| as so qualified, as its property: for then also the subject 454 V, 7| qualified by "to become" as its property, and the subject qualified 455 V, 7| destroyed’ will have as its property the predicate rendered with 456 V, 7| example, inasmuch as it is a property of man to be a mortal, it 457 V, 7| a mortal, it would be a property of becoming a man to become 458 V, 7| destruction of a mortal would be a property of the destruction of a 459 V, 7| purposes, if the suggested property fails to belong to the " 460 V, 7| description of which the property was rendered: for then what 461 V, 7| has been stated to be a property will not be a property. 462 V, 7| a property will not be a property. Thus (e.g.) inasmuch as " 463 V, 7| idea", it could not be a property of "man" to be motionless. 464 V, 7| the other hand, see if the property in question belongs to the 465 V, 7| been stated not to be a property: for then what has been 466 V, 7| been stated not to be a property will be a property. Thus ( 467 V, 7| be a property will be a property. Thus (e.g.) inasmuch as 468 V, 7| living-creature", it would be a property of "living-creature" to 469 V, 8| is more-P fails to be a property of what is more-S: for then 470 V, 8| will what is less-P be a property of what is less-S, nor least-P 471 V, 8| highly coloured is not a property of what is more a body, 472 V, 8| less highly coloured be a property of what is less a body, 473 V, 8| nor being coloured be a property of body at all. For constructive 474 V, 8| see if what is more-P is a property of what is more-S: for then 475 V, 8| what is less-P will be a property of what is less S, and least-P 476 V, 8| degree of sensation is a property of a higher degree of life, 477 V, 8| sensation also would be a property of a lower degree of life, 478 V, 8| if P simply fails to be a property of S simply; for then neither 479 V, 8| neither will more-P be a property of more-S, nor less-P of 480 V, 8| inasmuch as "virtuous" is not a property of "man", neither could " 481 V, 8| could "more virtuous" be a property of what is "more human". 482 V, 8| hand, see if P simply is a property of S simply: for then more 483 V, 8| then more P also will be a property of more-S, and less-P of 484 V, 8| move upwards by nature is a property of fire, and so also a greater 485 V, 8| upwards by nature would be a property of what is more fiery. In 486 V, 8| see if the more likely property fails to be a property of 487 V, 8| likely property fails to be a property of the more likely subject: 488 V, 8| neither will the less likely property be a property of the less 489 V, 8| less likely property be a property of the less likely subject. 490 V, 8| is more likely to be a property of "animal" than "knowing" 491 V, 8| and "perceiving" is not a property of "animal", "knowing" could 492 V, 8| knowing" could not be a property of "man". For constructive 493 V, 8| see if the less likely property is a property of the less 494 V, 8| less likely property is a property of the less likely subject; 495 V, 8| then too the more likely property will be a property of the 496 V, 8| likely property will be a property of the more likely subject. 497 V, 8| is less likely to be a property of man than "to live" of 498 V, 8| of an animal, and it is a property of man to be naturally civilized, 499 V, 8| civilized, it would be a property of animal to live.~Thirdly ( 500 V, 8| predicate fails to be a property of that of which it is more