Book, Paragraph

 1     VI,  6 |   those do who define line as "length without breadth": for this
 2     VI,  6 |       or its negation is true, length must always either lack
 3     VI,  6 |        or possess it, so that "length" as well, i.e. the genus
 4     VI,  6 |       or without breadth. But "length without breadth" is the
 5     VI,  6 |      of a species, as also is "length with breadth": for "without
 6     VI,  6 |        Ideas": for if absolute length exist, how will it be predicable
 7     VI,  6 |       will have to be true of "length" universally, if it is to
 8     VI,  6 |      they allege that absolute length and absolute animal are
 9     VI,  6 |      had defined something as "length possessed of breadth"; for
10    VII,  5 | enumerated at about sufficient length.~
11   VIII,  10|      longer to answer than the length of the discussion in hand.~