bold = Main text
    Liber, Caput     grey = Comment text

  1    Abbr         |   ABBREVIATIONS USED IN THIS WORK.~Cic. = Cicero; Ac., Acad. =
  2       I,      II|            Perpendiculi et normae. Cic. Academicorum lib. II.:
  3       I,      II|           sobrium, non madidum ... Cic. Academicorum lib. II.:
  4       I,      II|          Nonius p. 474. Urinantur. Cic. in Academicis lib. II.:
  5       I,      II|          Nonius p. 545. Alabaster. Cic. Academicorum lib. II.:
  6       I,     III|       Exultare dictum est exilire. Cic. Academicorum lib. III.:
  7       I,     III|     Ingeneraretur ut innasceretur. Cic. Academicorum lib. III.:
  8       I,     III|            morsu, pro morsibus ... Cic. Academicorum lib. III.:
  9       I,     III|           Nonius p. 117. Gallinas. Cic. Academicorum lib. III.:
 10       I,    IIII| Adstipulari positum est adsentiri. Cic. in Academicis lib. IIII.:
 11       I,    IIII|            unde et columna Maenia. Cic. Academicorum lib. IIII.:
 12       I,    IIII|       Nonius p. 164. Ravum fulvum. Cic. Academicorum lib. IIII.:
 13       I,    IIII|          est perpeti vel superare. Cic. Academicorum lib. IIII.:
 14       I,    IIII|            pro impedito et inepto. Cic. Academicorum lib. IIII.:
 15       I,    IIII|        Nonius p. 122. Infinitatem. Cic. Academicorum lib. IIII.:
 16       I,    IIII|           dicuntur angues natantes Cic. Academicorum lib. IIII.:
 17       I,    IIII|            189. Uncinatum ab unco. Cic. Academicorum lib. IIII.:
 18       I,    IIII|            positum est ex adverso. Cic. Academicorum lib. IIII.:
 19       I,    IIII|           et confusione trepidare, Cic. Academicorum lib. IIII.:
 20     Not,       1|           BOOK I.~§§1—14. Summary. Cic., Varro and Atticus meet
 21     Not,       1|         Atticus meet at Cumae (1). Cic., after adroitly reminding
 22     Not,       1|           have not treated (7, 8). Cic. lauds this devotion, but
 23     Not,       1|        request on one side charges Cic. with deserting the Old
 24     Not,       1|           Old Academy for the New. Cic. defends himself, and appeals
 25     Not,       1|            proposal on the part of Cic. to discuss thoroughly the
 26     Not,       1|          friend of Atticus than of Cic., see Introd. p. 37. Nuntiatum:
 27     Not,       1|       house news came. Audissemus: Cic. uses the contracted forms
 28     Not,       1|       Confestim: note how artfully Cic. uses the dramatic form
 29     Not,       1|            but Wesenberg (Em. M.T. Cic. Epistolarum, p. 62) shows
 30     Not,       1|          that it must be inserted. Cic. writes abesse Roma (Ad
 31     Not,       1|          for its insertion is like Cic. Ecquid forte Roma novi:
 32     Not,       1|        Istum: some edd. ipsum, but Cic. often makes a speaker use
 33     Not,       1|      illustrare: common phrases in Cic., e.g. D.F. I. 1, T.D. I.
 34     Not,       1|           Corss. II. 314. Ortam a: Cic. always writes the prep.
 35     Not,       1|           Genus: regularly used by Cic. as opus by Quintilian to
 36     Not,       1|          res to artibus is such as Cic. loves. Ceteris: the spelling
 37     Not,       1|           4. Deliberatam—agitatam: Cic. as usual exaggerates the
 38     Not,       1|           they are thoroughly like Cic. (cf. De Div. II. 1, Cat.
 39     Not,       1|           deference to MSS., makes Cic. write i and e indiscriminately
 40     Not,       1|            dicendi nec disserendi: Cic.'s constant mode of denoting
 41     Not,       1|        however is not thus used in Cic.'s phil. works. Utramque
 42     Not,       1|      impossible in such a place in Cic. (cf. M.D.F. V. 68). Ne
 43     Not,       1|            est often introduces in Cic. a clause which intensifies
 44     Not,       1|         opinion often denounced by Cic., see esp T.D. III. 41,
 45     Not,       1|            esp T.D. III. 41, where Cic.'s Latin agrees very closely
 46     Not,       1|    numerous passages produced from Cic. by Madv. (Em. 111), in
 47     Not,       1|         above, is a departure from Cic.'s rule which is to write
 48     Not,       1|          other similar passages in Cic. are explained as anacolutha
 49     Not,       1|         which is characteristic of Cic., see 11, 17. I am surprised
 50     Not,       1|           scarcely Latin, since in Cic. an accusative only follows
 51     Not,       1|        often quoted or imitated by Cic., cf. De Leg. I. 58, Laelius
 52     Not,       1|           which is indeed not like Cic.), would read e for a, which
 53     Not,       1|           haurire indifferently in Cic. Rivulos consectentur: so
 54     Not,       1|        rivulos is often applied by Cic. to philosophy, see esp.
 55     Not,       1|          Imitati non interpretati: Cic. D.F. I. 7, gives his opinion
 56     Not,       1|           occurs nowhere else, and Cic. almost condemns it by his
 57     Not,       1|          as an adjective much, yet Cic. uses philosophus adjectivally
 58     Not,       1|            balance of the clauses. Cic. however is quite as fond
 59     Not,       1|           genera, officia, causas. Cic. is fond of using sedes,
 60     Not,       1|          not necessary to force on Cic. this formally accurate
 61     Not,       1|          te: = σου διχα. Relictam: Cic. very rarely omits esse,
 62     Not,       1|           from a conservative like Cic. The words often occur together
 63     Not,       1|            together and illustrate Cic.'s love for small diversities
 64     Not,       1|             MSS. have negaret, but Cic. never writes the subj.
 65     Not,       1|        value, took it. Renovare in Cic. often means "to refresh
 66     Not,       1|           would occur elsewhere in Cic. as others do, if not familiar,
 67     Not,       1|         occur in similar places in Cic.'s dialogues cf. De Div.
 68     Not,       1|         Augustine, the imitator of Cic., Contra Academicos, I.
 69     Not,       1|        spoken of in these words by Cic., cf. 19, Timaeus c. 1,
 70     Not,       1|            veiled; cf. involucrum. Cic. shows his feeling of the
 71     Not,       1|            it, however occurred to Cic., and were curiously answered
 72     Not,       1|         with nihil ad elsewhere in Cic. is in De Leg. I. 6.~§16.
 73     Not,       1|          it may be doubted whether Cic. would let two adverbs stand
 74     Not,       1|      Baiter and Halm's edition, of Cic.'s philosophical works (
 75     Not,       1|           also II. 63. Perscripti: Cic. like Aristotle often speaks
 76     Not,       1|        that in four passages where Cic. speaks of this very oracle (
 77     Not,       1|          et ... tum, correspond in Cic. like tum ... cum, tum ...
 78     Not,       1|         Antiochus often adopted by Cic. in his own person, as in
 79     Not,       1|           same as vocabulis above. Cic. does not observe Varro'
 80     Not,       1|            this or duo is right in Cic., he can scarcely have been
 81     Not,       1|     duoviros, two near the time of Cic. (C.I. vol. I. nos. 571
 82     Not,       1|         and 1007) give duos, which Cic. probably wrote. Duo is
 83     Not,       1|           Stagiritam as Lamb., for Cic., exc. in a few nouns like
 84     Not,       1|            he were one of them; in Cic.'s letters to him the words "
 85     Not,       1|          is very characteristic of Cic., as we shall see later.
 86     Not,       1|        D.F. V. 35. Pulchritudinem: Cic. Orator 160, puts the spelling
 87     Not,       1|           theory of Aristotle. For Cic. cf. D.F. III. 66, De Leg.
 88     Not,       1|         D.F., which the student of Cic.'s philosophy ought to know
 89     Not,       1|         note there, will show that Cic. drew little distinction
 90     Not,       1|         Dei XIX. 3) coincides with Cic.'s in every particular.
 91     Not,       1|           maxima: so frequently in Cic., e.g. D.F. IV. 27, so Stob.
 92     Not,       1|   δεχομενον of the Timaeus (50 D). Cic. in Tim. has efficere and
 93     Not,       1|    efficeret ... materiam quandam: Cic. is hampered by the patrii
 94     Not,       1|             5 (qu. R. and P. 289). Cic. perhaps translates here
 95     Not,       1|           passim in comedy, whence Cic. takes it; cf. D.F. III.
 96     Not,       1|            III. 5 is very similar. Cic.'s words make it clear that
 97     Not,       1|            early as Isocrates. See Cic. on metaphor, De Or. III.
 98     Not,       1|            sequi. Quanto id magis: Cic. is exceedingly fond of
 99     Not,       1|      μονοειδης for unius modi; cf. Cic. Tim. ch. VII., a transl.
100     Not,       1|            will be there seen that Cic. is wrong in making initia
101     Not,       1|           poetical word revived by Cic. De Or. III. 153; cf. Quintil.
102     Not,       1|           neut.—"alles und jedes." Cic. knew the Tim. well and
103     Not,       1|            right in supposing that Cic. has said loosely of the
104     Not,       1|          apply to universal Force, Cic. would have qualified it
105     Not,       1|      curious passage (N.D. I. 33), Cic. charges Aristotle with
106     Not,       1|         severely criticised. Deum: Cic. in N.D. I. 30 remarks that
107     Not,       1|            can be found to this in Cic., it stands in glaring contradiction
108     Not,       1|            35 A thus translated by Cic., Tim. c. 7 ex ea materia
109     Not,       1|           regard to the meaning of Cic. has greatly increased the
110     Not,       1|            opinabile = δοξαστον in Cic. Tim ch. II. The term was
111     Not,       1|           In this rhetorical sense Cic. rejects the translation
112     Not,       1|      particular derivations, while Cic. in numerous passages (e.g.
113     Not,       1|        silly. Manut. conj. in quo, Cic. does often use the neut.
114     Not,       1|        have sometimes thought that Cic. wrote haec, inquam (cf.
115     Not,       1|            had not been Latinised, Cic. is obliged to use this
116     Not,       1|           is simply a variation of Cic.'s favourite double genitive (
117     Not,       1|      through Antiochus. In II. 134 Cic. speaks very differently
118     Not,       1|        translation of ευδαιμονιαν. Cic. N.D. I. 95 suggests beatitas
119     Not,       1|        sequence is not uncommon in Cic., e.g. D.F. III. 33. Omnia,
120     Not,       1|        value. Contraque contraria: Cic. here as in D.F. III. 50
121     Not,       1|         out the difficulties thus: Cic. appears at first sight
122     Not,       1|        hand, I do not believe that Cic. could so utterly misunderstand
123     Not,       1|           opposed to the fact that Cic. in 36 had explained with
124     Not,       1|             My explanation is that Cic. began with the intention
125     Not,       1|            defer for the present.) Cic. therefore is chargeable
126     Not,       1|      sensible reader would suppose Cic. to have had that intention.
127     Not,       1|           Supposing that by ex iis Cic. means mediis, and not sumendis,
128     Not,       1|           Latin, e.g. sin minus in Cic. means "but if not." Even
129     Not,       1|          tam rebus quam vocabulis: Cic. frequently repeats this
130     Not,       1|             distinctly contradicts Cic. and Stob., see R. and P.
131     Not,       1|           et and que correspond in Cic., the que is always an afterthought,
132     Not,       1|             of Stoic παθεσι, which Cic. rejects in D.F. III. 35.
133     Not,       1|           the T.D. III. p. 8, says Cic. always uses efferri laetitia
134     Not,       1|     curious and recondite fashion. Cic. is certainly wrong in stating
135     Not,       1|           material origin to mind. Cic. repeats the error in T.
136     Not,       1|           which were well known to Cic. and had taken great hold
137     Not,       1|     κινησεως must be ακινητος, but Cic. had no means of knowing
138     Not,       1|          had over Cicero. Further, Cic. would naturally link the
139     Not,       1|        enough to show that neither Cic. nor Antiochus, whom Madv.
140     Not,       1|          have here an anacoluthon. Cic. meant to say iunctos e
141     Not,       1|        admission not often made by Cic., who usually contends,
142     Not,       1|             which use is copied by Cic. and may be seen in several
143     Not,       1|      passages might be quoted from Cic.~§44. Non pertinacia aut
144     Not,       1|           from being a sceptic, as Cic. supposes; see note on II.
145     Not,       1|         exponere. Angustos sensus: Cic. is thinking of the famous
146     Not,       1|     however often thus repeated by Cic.~§45. Ne illud quidem: cf.
147     Not,       2|          This opinion of Antiochus Cic. had already mentioned 43,
148     Not,       2|            fragment belongs. If so Cic. must have condemned the
149     Not,       2|          sceptical arguments which Cic. in the first edition had
150     Not,       2|             81, on the other hand, Cic. drew an argument hostile
151     Not,       2|            not Book III., and that Cic., when he changed the scene
152     Not,       2|             see Luc. 105, 120, and Cic.'s words in 8 of the same).
153     Not,       2|            has dixi for dictus. As Cic. does not often leave out
154     Not,       2|            IV. to the second half. Cic. therefore divided the Luc.
155     Not,       2|      assault on the senses made by Cic. in the second book.~33.
156     Not,       2|          regard it as belonging to Cic.'s exposition of the positive
157     Not,       2|       doctrine in the second book. Cic. repeatedly insists that
158     Not,       2|           taken from a stock which Cic. kept on hand ready made? (
159     Not,       2|        edition of the Academica of Cic. No writings of the Classical
160     Not,       2|           historical exposition of Cic. must have ended. From this
161     Not,       2|            attack on the senses by Cic. in Book II. are difficult
162     Not,       2|         Non admodum exspectabatur: Cic. forgets that Luc. had served
163     Not,       2|          in is excessively rare in Cic. Madv. D.F. V. 53 denies
164     Not,       2|          33 homo factus ad unguem, Cic. De Or. III. 184, In Verr.
165     Not,       2|          D.F. V. 68, shows that in Cic. a parenthetic clause with
166     Not,       2|       expression is very common in Cic., and the relative always
167     Not,       2|          loquantur: hist. means in Cic. rather "memoirs" than "
168     Not,       2|             p. 38. In Cat. Mai. §3 Cic. actually apologises for
169     Not,       2|       frequently occur together in Cic. and illustrate his love
170     Not,       2|           For the proceeding which Cic. deprecates, cf. N.D. I.
171     Not,       2|     Terence, found, but rarely, in Cic. and Livy. In promptu ...
172     Not,       2|           the Academica 1827) that Cic. commonly uses the perfect
173     Not,       2|          two passages is doubtful. Cic. as a rule prefers long
174     Not,       2|            cf. I. 33. Agam igitur: Cic. rather overdoes the attempt
175     Not,       2|             Old Academy," and when Cic. wrote the Academica the
176     Not,       2|            De and ex are common in Cic. after audire, while ab
177     Not,       2|           venire is very common in Cic.'s letters. C. Flaminium:
178     Not,       2|          so much, and if they did, Cic. may be allowed the inconsistency.~§
179     Not,       2|        would point to Zenonem, but Cic. does not often name Zeno
180     Not,       2|   pericacia. Democriti verecundia: Cic. always has a kind of tenderness
181     Not,       2|          se ipse: very frequent in Cic. (cf. Madv. Gram. 487 b).
182     Not,       2|           disordered, confused" in Cic. The difference here is
183     Not,       2|         such expressions abound in Cic. where the New Academy is
184     Not,       2|           translations proposed by Cic. were illustratio (Quint.
185     Not,       2|           119, 121. Me appellabat: Cic. was the great advocate
186     Not,       2|           sequence of particles in Cic., cf. 19. Ακαταληπτον: the
187     Not,       2|     reprint of his Academica) that Cic. omits to represent the
188     Not,       2|         book, where we may suppose Cic. to be expressing the views
189     Not,       2|          important for us is, that Cic. never seems to have made
190     Not,       2|             and Aesch. Agam. 1328. Cic. often applies metaphorically
191     Not,       2|            Ennius, often quoted by Cic., as De Div. I. 23. Interiorem:
192     Not,       2|          pr. quom. Ille equus est: Cic. seems to consider that
193     Not,       2|            208—211. Notitiae: this Cic. uses as a translation both
194     Not,       2|           in 40. Quae potest esse: Cic. nearly always writes putat
195     Not,       2|       asserting after Wopkens that Cic. never inserts ut after
196     Not,       2|       allege. Naturae ... alienum: Cic. uses this adjective with
197     Not,       2|          is not elsewhere found in Cic. Summa: cf. summa philosophiae
198     Not,       2|    Artificio: this word is used in Cic. as equivalent to ars in
199     Not,       2|           Sext. Pyrr. Hyp. II. 75. Cic. uses this word as including
200     Not,       2|      constituit. Notitiae: cf. 22. Cic. fails to distinguish between
201     Not,       2|          and other inaccuracies of Cic. in treating of the same
202     Not,       2|          of Antiocheanism found in Cic. Cf. I. 20.~§31. Vitaeque
203     Not,       2|            tense is odd and unlike Cic. Lamb. wrote dicimus, I
204     Not,       2|           in 99. Animal ... animo: Cic. allows animus to all animals,
205     Not,       2|           however in thinking that Cic. only uses the word once
206     Not,       2|           is quite impossible that Cic. could have written it.
207     Not,       2|         trans. of καταλαμβανεσθαι; Cic. proceeds as usual on the
208     Not,       2|         declarantibus. Subtiliter: Cic.'s constant trans. of ακριβως
209     Not,       2|         sublato in 33. Argumentum: Cic. seems to be thinking of
210     Not,       2|          Dav. obscurare is against Cic.'s usage, that of Christ
211     Not,       2|    Orationis: as Faber points out, Cic. does sometimes use this
212     Not,       2|           use of nullus for non in Cic. cf. Madv. Gram. 455 obs.
213     Not,       2|       Plaut. and Terence, while in Cic. it occurs mostly in the
214     Not,       2|          cf. De Div. II. 11 (where Cic. says the Greek word was
215     Not,       2|       referred to by Lucr. I. 124, Cic. De Rep. VI. 10 (Somn. Scip.
216     Not,       2|           1, 50. Simul ut: rare in Cic., see Madv. D.F. II. 33,
217     Not,       2|           the ut precedes a vowel; Cic. therefore used it to avoid
218     Not,       2|        however is as impossible in Cic. as the c before a guttural
219     Not,       2|          Ennius is often quoted by Cic., e.g. D.F. IV. 62.~§53.
220     Not,       2|         esse: in phrases like this Cic. nearly always places esse
221     Not,       2|           often appear together in Cic., e.g.D.F. III. 25.~§56.
222     Not,       2|           in the famous passage of Cic Ad Quintum Fratrem, II.
223     Not,       2|     sequeris, the constant form in Cic. of the pres., must be read.
224     Not,       2|     Comperisse: this expression of Cic., used in the senate in
225     Not,       2|         phrase at Rome, with which Cic. was often taunted. See
226     Not,       2|            accorded by Lucullus to Cic. during the conspiracy see
227     Not,       2|          ου occurs nowhere else in Cic. Bait. therefore ejects
228     Not,       2|          obs. 2.~§§64—71. Summary. Cic. much moved thus begins.
229     Not,       2|       calumnia: n. on 14. Iurarem: Cic. was thinking of his own
230     Not,       2|            these lines are part of Cic.'s Aratea, and are quoted
231     Not,       2|            the absurdity of making Cic. say that the old arguments
232     Not,       2|         and are often mentioned by Cic. and Livy. In De Or. II.
233     Not,       2|         occurs not unfrequently in Cic., e g De Invent. II. 115
234     Not,       2|           452, obs. 1, 2, Zumpt on Cic. Verr. IV. 73. Honesti inane
235     Not,       2|        επιδειξεος.~§73. Democrito: Cic., as Madv. remarks on D.F.
236     Not,       2|         nihil sciri posse by which Cic. interprets it (cf. R. and
237     Not,       2|         and P. 177—182. σοφισματα: Cic. in the second edition probably
238     Not,       2|      intimas) it might appear that Cic. is translating either παθος
239     Not,       2|           sharply distinguished by Cic., the latter merely implying
240     Not,       2|     ellipse of excessive rarity in Cic., see Madv. Opusc. I. 448,
241     Not,       2|        ordinary stopping expresses Cic.'s needless approval of
242     Not,       2|            in critical editions of Cic. exx. occur every few pages.
243     Not,       2|        παραπιεσας τον οφθαλμον) so Cic. De Div. II. 120. Lucretius
244     Not,       2|       which is very often found in Cic., e.g. Orat. 18. Cic. sometimes
245     Not,       2|            in Cic., e.g. Orat. 18. Cic. sometimes however joins
246     Not,       2|           was a favourite one with Cic., see Ad Att. I. 13, 5.~§
247     Not,       2|            would have implied that Cic. had some particular thing
248     Not,       2|        adsentiuntur. Siccorum: cf. Cic. Contra Rullum I. 1 consilia
249     Not,       2|           favourite quotation with Cic.; see Ad Att. XIV. 14, and
250     Not,       2|            Trag. Lat. rel. p. 205. Cic. in De Or. III. 162 thus
251     Not,       2|             the ipsa, according to Cic.'s usage, is nom. and not
252     Not,       2|       similar arguments to this of Cic. occur in Sext., cf. esp.
253     Not,       2|         Atticus XIII. 21, in which Cic. discusses different translations
254     Not,       2|            spelling was antique in Cic.'s time and only used in
255     Not,       2|            41. The past partic. in Cic. often has the same meaning
256     Not,       2|            out that in the Timaeus Cic. translates αλυτος by indissolutus
257     Not,       2|           The idea of Orelli, that Cic. clipped these trite sophisms
258     Not,       2|            utterly tautological as Cic.'s translation, which merges
259     Not,       2|           principles, according to Cic. Ludere: this reminds one
260     Not,       2|            the passage will defend Cic. against the strong censure
261     Not,       2|             and still believe that Cic. is capable of supposing,
262     Not,       2|        moveri in 24. Non enim est: Cic. in the vast majority of
263     Not,       2|            Nonius, but the MSS. of Cic. give here ebore. Dolatus:
264     Not,       2|           I. 18, 27); the last use Cic. condemns himself in Orat.
265     Not,       2|           the use of tenses, which Cic. displays in narrating the
266     Not,       2|            among recent editors of Cic. a strong tendency to reject
267     Not,       2|         construction are common in Cic., and I cannot follow Halm
268     Not,       2|             14, who doubts whether Cic. ever wrote -is in the gen.
269     Not,       2|          10. Sibi ipsum: note that Cic. does not generally make
270     Not,       2|            suggestion of Halm, but Cic. states the doctrine as
271     Not,       2|            like this are common in Cic., e.g. D.F. I. 54, De Off.
272     Not,       2|         Peripatetico: nothing that Cic. states here is at discord
273     Not,       2|        A.M. VII. 216—226. All that Cic. says is that he could accept
274     Not,       2|            the examples given from Cic. by Madv. on D.F. II. 13.
275     Not,       2|           77 nemo. Utrumque verum: Cic. of course only accepts
276     Not,       2|         oratoribus ... rexisse: so Cic. vary often speaks of the
277     Not,       2|     Sustinuero: cf. 70. Tam bonos: Cic. often speaks of them and
278     Not,       2|         Such breaks often occur in Cic., as in Orator 87 sed nunc
279     Not,       2|          Sext. as above), (2) that Cic. has by preference described
280     Not,       2|            joined with pronouns in Cic. Sententiam eliget et: MSS.
281     Not,       2|           very often alluded to by Cic. as in D.F. I. 12, IV. 6,
282     Not,       2|            37. Concessisse primas: Cic. always considers Thales
283     Not,       2|             26). Hence Markland on Cic. Ad Brutum II. 15, 3 argued
284     Not,       2|          Flumen aureum: Plut. Vita Cic. 24 alludes to this (‛οτι
285     Not,       2|           the constant judgment of Cic. about Aristotle's style.
286     Not,       2|             follows. Nostra causa: Cic. always writes mea, tua,
287     Not,       2|             the connection is that Cic., having given the crotchets
288     Not,       2|          Epicurus' absurdity is by Cic. brought into strong relief
289     Not,       2|         animum: a common phrase in Cic., cf. Philipp. XII. 21.
290     Not,       2|    repeated questions of this kind Cic. usually puts the corresponding
291     Not,       2|       clarum, nisi nobilem), where Cic. protests against being
292     Not,       2|           be directly addressed to Cic. by the Antiocheans, and
293     Not,       2|  Commenticiis: a favourite word of Cic., cf. De Div. II. 113.~§
294     Not,       2|      Consideratio contemplatioque: Cic. is fond of this combination,
295     Not,       2|             add Virg. Aen. VI. 49, Cic. Orat. 119. Exigua et minima:
296     Not,       2|          78 notes that except here Cic. always writes exigua et
297     Not,       2|           octodecim is not used by Cic. Sol quantus sit: 91. Omnium
298     Not,       2|            this is not uncommon in Cic., as in Lucretius. Omitto:
299     Not,       2|         Relicta: cf. 130 abiectos. Cic. generally classes Herillus (
300     Not,       2|           Megaricorum: Xenophanes. Cic considers the Eleatic and
301     Not,       2|          genitive is Calliphontis, Cic. ought according to rule
302     Not,       2|            14, in which last place Cic. says of him quem iam cur
303     Not,       2|        Antiochus. Ne sibi constet: Cic. argues in T.D. V. that
304     Not,       2|       diminutives come together in Cic., and the usage is rather
305     Not,       2|           T.D. III. 10. Mirabilia: Cic. generally translates παραδοξα
306     Not,       2|      Antiochus. But in both places Cic. speaks as a friend of Antiochus;
307     Not,       2|             Prima naturae commoda: Cic. here as in D.F. IV. 59,
308     Not,       2|         adj. not elsewhere used by Cic.) was manufactured on the
309     Not,       2|           est concitare? Expromam: Cic. was probably thinking of
310     Not,       2|          my conjecture is correct, Cic. tried at first to manage