bold = Main text
    Liber, Caput     grey = Comment text

  1     Pre         |        sources. Wherever a quotation would not have been given but
  2     Pre         |            to give information which would be complete for a reader
  3     Int,       I|            of Letters: 9045 B.C.~It would seem that Cicero's love
  4     Int,       I|         devotion to philosophy.11 It would be unwise to lay too much
  5     Int,       I|          such reading as his leisure would allow. The letters contained
  6     Int,       I|           solace and support, and he would rather sit in a garden seat
  7     Int,       I|             asked Atticus whether it would look foolish to build a
  8     Int,      II|            student of philosophy, it would be indispensable to enter
  9     Int,      II|           and new Academic. These it would be necessary to know, not
 10     Int,      II|              uttering opinions which would have been recognised as
 11     Int,      II| establishment of a criterion such as would suffice to distinguish the
 12     Int,      II|             go more into detail here would be to anticipate the text
 13     Int,      II|        dialectical [xxi] difference, would naturally look upon Cicero
 14     Int,      II|           boldly for Carneades, they would naturally regard him as
 15     Int,      II|            happiness of the wise man would remain unimpaired even if
 16     Int,     III|           when he wrote, originality would have been looked upon as
 17     Int,     III|              pre-existing tenets. It would be hasty to conclude that
 18     Int,     III|              to their country118. It would be a glorious thing, he
 19     Int,     III|            Greece, Cicero thought it would flourish and take the place
 20     Int,      IV|       together135. At other times he would plunge at early morning
 21     Int,      IV|        entreaties of Atticus that he would return to the forum and
 22     Int,      IV|       scarcely enable him to endure, would crush him, he felt, in the
 23     Int,      IV|            kind of information which would be needed in writing the
 24     Int,      IV|          work to which our Academica would correspond139. He asks what
 25     Int,      IV|              delay of even ten years would make the effort no less
 26     Int,      IV|           before the Academica. This would be clear from the mention
 27     Int,      IV|              made that the Academica would just suit Varro, who was
 28     Int,      IV|           for whose importunities he would probably again have changed
 29     Int,      IV|          contains entreaties that he would consider the matter over
 30     Int,      IV|            his doubt as to how Varro would receive the dedication184.
 31     Int,      IV|           the dedication184. Atticus would seem to have repeatedly
 32     Int,      IV|        uneasy as to the reception it would meet with from Varro. He
 33     Int,      IV|         Varro came to Rome the books would be sent to him. "By this
 34     Int,      IV|              from his father. Cicero would, doubtless, have preferred
 35     Int,      IV|           the De Oratore, the author would have been [xlv] compelled
 36     Int,      IV|              the people on whom they would rely if Pompey, with such
 37     Int,      IV|               most of [xlviii] which would fall to Cicero's share,
 38     Int,      IV|          prominent Academics, Cicero would not have failed to tell
 39     Int,      IV|         between αδηλα and ακαταληπτα would be a peculiarly congenial
 40     Int,      IV|              the sceptical criticism would naturally be reserved for
 41     Int,      IV|             Arcesilaean doctrines as would clear the ground for the
 42     Int,      IV|         Carneades, that the wise man would opine255 (τον σοφον δοξασειν),
 43     Int,      IV|              of Hortensius257, which would be appropriate only in the
 44     Int,      IV|             view I have taken, there would be little difficulty in
 45     Int,      IV|          supposed Hortensius to give would be within the reach of any
 46     Int,      IV|      cultivated man of the time, and would only be put forward to show
 47     Int,      IV|             the Academica Priora. He would naturally occupy the [lvii]
 48     Int,      IV|              If this be true, Brutus would not speak at length in the
 49     Int,      IV|             fact. This impossibility would at once occur to Varro,
 50     Not,       1|              read efficientis, which would then govern rerum (cf. D.F.
 51     Not,       1|            is indeed not like Cic.), would read e for a, which Halm
 52     Not,       1|             read e for a, which Halm would also prefer. De, ab, and
 53     Not,       1|            to read cum (=quom, which would be written quō in the MSS.)
 54     Not,       1|              MSS.) The general sense would then be "Having introduced
 55     Not,       1|            MSS. reading? The meaning would then be "to write for philosophers,"
 56     Not,       1|             for philosophers," which would agree with my emendation
 57     Not,       1|              quo above. Philosophice would be a tempting alteration,
 58     Not,       1|           illam. The position of iam would be strange, in the passage
 59     Not,       1|               have adsideamus, which would be wrong here. Sane istud:
 60     Not,       1|            commonplace, if familiar, would occur elsewhere in Cic.
 61     Not,       1|          others do, if not familiar, would not be given without the
 62     Not,       1|              be doubted whether Cic. would let two adverbs stand together
 63     Not,       1|              common nouns, though he would not use vocabulum as Tac.
 64     Not,       1|             the nom. Varro, however, would never say that philosophy
 65     Not,       1|             did away with what Plato would have considered most valuable
 66     Not,       1|               6, 8, 13, φιλια, φιλοι would belong to the quaedam of
 67     Not,       1|           ευτυχια ευγενεια δυναστεια would be included in cetera. The
 68     Not,       1|        haecque, like hicque, sicque, would be un-Ciceronian. Voluptatibus:
 69     Not,       1|             the Stoics and Antiochus would allow), the sentence does
 70     Not,       1|        convertible terms. The Greeks would call the four elements στοιχεια
 71     Not,       1|            but not αρχαι, which term would be reserved for the primary
 72     Not,       1|                quoddam: so MSS.; one would expect quiddam, which Orelli
 73     Not,       1|  dittographia from utro. The meaning would be "since force plays this
 74     Not,       1|             to universal Force, Cic. would have qualified it with a
 75     Not,       1|             believing that our world would be destroyed by fire (Diog.
 76     Not,       1|           and Aristotle's τα καθαλου would naturally seem microscopic
 77     Not,       1|          there was in Antiochus, who would have glided over Plato's
 78     Not,       1|        iudicia sunt, etc.: Antiochus would probably defend his agreement
 79     Not,       1|     Aristotle and Plato, though each would put a separate meaning on
 80     Not,       1|           examination of authorities would have led Halm to retract
 81     Not,       1|             influence happiness, and would allow the name good to nothing
 82     Not,       1|        universal substance, while he would not allow the existence
 83     Not,       1|           disputationes philosophiae would not be Latin. The em. is
 84     Not,       1|            meorum magno opere miror) would not eulogise himself quite
 85     Not,       1|              Halm supposes, a reader would not be much incommoded.
 86     Not,       1|              the knowledge, which it would be absurd to attempt to
 87     Not,       1|            though no sensible reader would suppose Cic. to have had
 88     Not,       1|           over Cicero. Further, Cic. would naturally link the mind
 89     Not,       1|               well" is weak, "abyss" would suit better. Institutis:
 90     Not,       2|               Grundz p. 326. A diver would be in exactly the position
 91     Not,       2|              of seals (Luc. 19, 54), would also appear in both editions.
 92     Not,       2|             added to a passage which would correspond in substance
 93     Not,       2|              Ac. Posteriora. As this would leave very meagre material
 94     Not,       2|              a good deal of learning would have been considered unworthy
 95     Not,       2|             to our notions, the sons would have gained greater glory
 96     Not,       2|             which has been proposed, would not be Latin, see De Leg.
 97     Not,       2|               until his triumph Luc. would remain outside the city.
 98     Not,       2|              after the first year he would be pro quaestor. Dav. reads
 99     Not,       2|            Panactius'. Auctorem: one would think this simple and sound
100     Not,       2|              Petrilius and Pompilius would then agree like Petronius
101     Not,       2|           the legal effect the bills would have. Ut videmus ... ut
102     Not,       2|             1471) has Cenonem, which would point to Zenonem, but Cic.
103     Not,       2|        alteration. If kept the sense would be: "but let us suppose,
104     Not,       2|              Arcesilas and Carneades would not have attempted to disprove
105     Not,       2|   Clitomachus as he usually does. It would seem from that passage that
106     Not,       2|             latter that the wise man would "opine," that is, would
107     Not,       2|              would "opine," that is, would pronounce definite judgments
108     Not,       2|              of Stobaeus' Ethica, he would appear to have afterwards
109     Not,       2|          seen from moral action. Who would act, if the things on which
110     Not,       2|         doctrines of the New Academy would put an end to all processes
111     Not,       2|         minds. This, Carneades said, would be inconsistent, since the
112     Not,       2|            between pleasure and pain would be obscured. Sentiet ...
113     Not,       2|              of course the Academics would say they did not hold this
114     Not,       2|           This I have," the Academic would reply, "in my probabile."
115     Not,       2|               Lamb. wrote dicimus, I would rather read dicamus; cf.
116     Not,       2|        rectum et pravum: the sceptic would no more allow the absolute
117     Not,       2|          words in minima dispertiunt would hardly apply. Adiuncta:
118     Not,       2|               n. on 29). An Academic would say in reply to the question, "
119     Not,       2|      attention to the subject matter would have shown emendation to
120     Not,       2|            view of the Academic, who would allow that things in their
121     Not,       2|          sharply-defined genera, but would deny that the sensations
122     Not,       2|             no distinction exist, he would give up the attempt to draw
123     Not,       2|           substitution of which here would perhaps make the sentence
124     Not,       2|             for V in the MSS., and I would easily slip in. Eosdem:
125     Not,       2|             any change be needed, it would be better to place it before
126     Not,       2|          this of course the sceptics would deny. They refused to discuss
127     Not,       2|          were removed a better sense would be given. It has often been
128     Not,       2|     sincerity in all that I say, and would confirm it by an oath, were
129     Not,       2|            The argument of Carneades would then run thus, (1) Si ulli
130     Not,       2|           inane nomen esse: a modern would be inclined to write honestum,
131     Not,       2|           reading to be novas, which would be written nobas, and then
132     Not,       2|              doctrine which Socrates would have left to the Sophists.
133     Not,       2|       approval of Arcesilas' conduct would thus gain in point. Qy,
134     Not,       2|            the god of whom you spoke would ask me whether I wanted
135     Not,       2|           more than sound senses. He would have a bad time with me.
136     Not,       2|           because he is blind. Yet I would not so much reproach the
137     Not,       2|          iaceret the reading lacerat would arise at once. The nom.
138     Not,       2|           Caec. 47, where nescio qui would contradict his rule. It
139     Not,       2|              stadia distant," aberat would have implied that Cic. had
140     Not,       2|           reading. Quererer cum deo: would enter into an altercation
141     Not,       2|         atque in, which last leading would make omnibus = om. statuis.
142     Not,       2|             which Dav. altered. Halm would prefer credidit. Itera dum,
143     Not,       2|             remind you that Epicurus would not allow the very first
144     Not,       2|               Imperceptus, which one would expect, is found in Ovid.~§
145     Not,       2|         construction, which in Greek would be marked by μεν and δε,
146     Not,       2|        Lucretius. Probo ... bono: it would have seemed more natural
147     Not,       2|            nunc a sole. C.F. Hermann would place mane ravum after quodque
148     Not,       2|           not so exacting, my course would be easier; I should not
149     Not,       2|              Doubtless a Peripatetic would have wondered how a sceptic
150     Not,       2|           conj. nimio minares, which would be much nearer the MSS.;
151     Not,       2|       philosophy take Physics first. Would your sapiens swear to the
152     Not,       2|      anything is to be introduced, I would rather add et crassitudine
153     Not,       2|           that the living protoplasm would have the same properties
154     Not,       2|             Erillum or et illum, one would expect ut Herilli. Cognitione
155     Not,       2|     different way. Pyrrho autem: one would expect Pyrrhoni as Dav.
156     Not,       2|      different fines; otherwise fine would have been written. Cf. I.
157     Not,       2|             there can be no art. How would Zeuxis and Polycletus like
158     Not,       2|           like this conclusion? They would prefer mine, to which our
159     Not,       2|    imputation which, as Stoics, they would most repel. Hermann's spinosissimi
160     Not,       2|           and if an em. were needed, would not be so utterly improbable
161     Not,       2|         dicto. Ne nobis quidem: "nor would they be angry;" cf. n. on.
Best viewed with any browser at 800x600 or 768x1024 on Tablet PC
IntraText® (VA1) - Some rights reserved by EuloTech SRL - 1996-2009. Content in this page is licensed under a Creative Commons License