bold = Main text
    Liber, Caput     grey = Comment text

  1     Pre         |             Davies appeared in 1725, no English scholar has edited
  2     Pre         |        actual quotation.~As there is no important doctrine of Ancient
  3     Pre         |       regarded as an experiment, for no English scholar of recent
  4     Int,       I|         egotism has been made, leave no doubt about his diligence
  5     Int,       I|          this theory, which rests on no better evidence than that
  6     Int,       I|          Demetrius Syrus, there were no eminent rhetorical teachers
  7     Int,       I|              There seem to have been no eminent representatives
  8     Int,       I|              which we have little or no information, we may believe
  9     Int,       I|         philosophical studies had by no means been allowed to drop45.
 10     Int,       I|             says "I assure you I had no sooner returned to Rome
 11     Int,       I|            justify his boast that at no time had he been divorced
 12     Int,       I|        unfairness which I shall have no better opportunity of mentioning [
 13     Int,      II|         opinion whether they will or no, merely because one of their
 14     Int,      II|              seek for the truth, has no truth to follow89. The probable
 15     Int,      II|         Academic dialectic had found no eminent expositor. So much
 16     Int,      II|            to Zeno, and there can be no doubt that he caught it
 17     Int,     III|     centuries, if we omit Carneades, no one had propounded anything
 18     Int,     III|           which ultimately exercised no unimportant influence on
 19     Int,     III|              the fact that there was no other philosophy for Latin
 20     Int,     III|             it has been, I can treat no farther.~These Roman Epicureans
 21     Int,     III|            he thinks, if Romans were no longer absolutely compelled
 22     Int,     III|           civil war122.~There can be no doubt that Cicero was penetrated
 23     Int,      IV|           literary projects, we find no express mention in his letters
 24     Int,      IV|          years would make the effort no less painful147. Before
 25     Int,      IV|           though of noble birth, had no claim to learning175. So
 26     Int,      IV|            he finally decided181. As no reasons had been given for
 27     Int,      IV|        assured Cicero that there was no cause for fear; but the
 28     Int,      IV|              two are mentioned, that no very high value was placed
 29     Int,      IV|             of the senate218. In him no storm of danger, no favouring
 30     Int,      IV|              him no storm of danger, no favouring breeze of fortune,
 31     Int,      IV|            such matters, we can have no difficulty in conjecturing
 32     Int,      IV|         repeatedly asserts that from no other schools can the orator
 33     Int,      IV|          that Catulus could have had no leaning towards the Stoics
 34     Int,      IV|          later years of Catulus, and no one at all conversant with
 35     Int,      IV|     acquainted with his opinions246. No follower of Carneades and
 36     Int,      IV|             the Lucullus proves that no general or minute demonstration
 37     Int,      IV|           and Lucullus, there can be no doubt that Brutus occupied
 38     Int,      IV|            Atticus that Lucullus was no philosopher. He has to be
 39     Int,      IV|           the speech of Lucullus was no doubt transferred to Brutus,
 40     Int,      IV|          learning which is by [lxii] no means natural to Cicero.
 41     Int,      IV|              will show that there is no reason for accusing Cicero
 42     Not,       1|           written in Latin can serve no useful purpose, and points
 43     Not,       1|              the first si has really no conditional force, si qui
 44     Not,       1|             as Halm remarks, implies no more than the Germ. auch
 45     Not,       1|               If quoniam is read and no break made at adducere,
 46     Not,       1|            broken sequence. There is no need therefore to read sive
 47     Not,       1|        Orelli, Klotz, whose text has no independent value, took
 48     Not,       1|              philosophy (15). He had no fixed tenets, his one doctrine
 49     Not,       1|          found once (Corp. Inscr. I. no 1019). Sepulchrum, however,
 50     Not,       1|         reflection will show that in no other way could Antiochus
 51     Not,       1|              universe, outside which no matter exists. Reason permeates
 52     Not,       1|            not Latin. The words have no philosophical significance
 53     Not,       1|     intervalla ... possint: there is no ultimate space atom, just
 54     Not,       1|         space atom, just as there is no matter atom. As regards
 55     Not,       1|            Quam vim animum: there is no need to read animam, as
 56     Not,       1|               κατηναγκασμενον. I see no reason for suspecting inter,
 57     Not,       1|           changing and fleeting that no part of their being remained
 58     Not,       1|              after, so that there is no possibility of avoiding
 59     Not,       1|       reading. I venture to say that no real parallel can be found
 60     Not,       1|         making Antiochus assert that no true information can be
 61     Not,       1|        Berkley's nodis for notis has no support, (enodatio nominum
 62     Not,       1|            the metaphor is, requires no qualification, see a good
 63     Not,       1|          them rejected, to the third no value whatever—mere verbal
 64     Not,       1|             T.D. V. 25, 85. There is no reason to suppose that he
 65     Not,       1|      inciderit but poneret. There is no need to alter (as Manut.,
 66     Not,       1|           ipsis ... numerabat: I see no reason for placing this
 67     Not,       1|         Ritter and Preller. There is no royal road to the knowledge,
 68     Not,       1|              III. 50), that there is no reason for suspecting the
 69     Not,       1|             of the προηγμενα, though no sensible reader would suppose
 70     Not,       1|        opinion. The error once made, no one could correct it, for
 71     Not,       1|            be ακινητος, but Cic. had no means of knowing this (see
 72     Not,       1|               Ignem: the Stoics made no difference, except one of
 73     Not,       1|            esse non corpus: there is no ultimate difference between
 74     Not,       1|             εναργεια, which requires no corroboration from without.
 75     Not,       1|           give aperirentur. There is no MSS. variant. Aliena: cf.
 76     Not,       1|     Arcesilas' philosophy was due to no mere passion for victory
 77     Not,       1|         omnia: παντα εφεξης there is no need to read denique for
 78     Not,       2|             or in that of Cicero. As no reason whatever appears
 79     Not,       2|              not be supposed to have no truths to maintain, see
 80     Not,       2|             of the Academica of Cic. No writings of the Classical
 81     Not,       2|              because it had met with no opposition. The Old Academy
 82     Not,       2|       administrator, and was allowed no triumph till just before
 83     Not,       2|           philosophy, have neglected no public duty, nor do I think
 84     Not,       2| interlocutors in these dialogues had no such knowledge show that
 85     Not,       2|           know that Academicism puts no stop to inquiry (7). My
 86     Not,       2|           texts (1861 and 1863) give no variants. Pace here perhaps
 87     Not,       2|            cf. the Lowland Scottish "no just sae". Historiae loquantur:
 88     Not,       2|         confusion into the text, but no other good critic since
 89     Not,       2|           doubt, do you suppose that no advance has been made during
 90     Not,       2|           many dogmatists think that no argument ought to be held
 91     Not,       2|            not one between order and no order, but between knowledge
 92     Not,       2|            but between knowledge and no knowledge, so that incognita
 93     Not,       2|             note that Arcesilas left no writings so that Lacydes
 94     Not,       2|              I. 5) Epict. says it is no more use arguing with a
 95     Not,       2|         καταλ. φαντ. and substituted no other mode of curing the
 96     Not,       2|              individual. I can quote no parallel to this from the
 97     Not,       2|          frequently found, but gives no exx. For the meaning cf.
 98     Not,       2|             Lucretius), but there is no need to alter. Lux is properly
 99     Not,       2|        statements in the text are in no sense arguments, they are
100     Not,       2|           and on the other hold that no absolutely certain method
101     Not,       2|            marks as can appertain to no other thing. How can a thing
102     Not,       2|          mere phantom (34)? There is no definite mark, say the sceptics,
103     Not,       2|             se: καθ' αυτην, there is no need to read propter, as
104     Not,       2|            pravum: the sceptic would no more allow the absolute
105     Not,       2|              A.M. VII. 167—175). Now no sensation is perceived alone;
106     Not,       2|          proceeds, then you can have no faith in any appearance
107     Not,       2|              not. There is therefore no sensation which is also
108     Not,       2|            nihil interesse: there is no inconsistency. Carneades
109     Not,       2|        phantom behind which there is no reality at all. Quae in
110     Not,       2|           Lucullus answers that, did no distinction exist, he would
111     Not,       2|            351 b, obs. 4 he attempts no elucidation, I cannot be
112     Not,       2|            the Stoics contended that no two things were absolutely
113     Not,       2|             of ulla into nulla is in no way needed. Ut [sibi] sint:
114     Not,       2|       reading of the MSS., for which no satisfactory em. has yet
115     Not,       2|             a trans. I have met with no other passage where any
116     Not,       2|            edd. before Madv., seeing no way of taking modo exc.
117     Not,       2|          more probable that he could no longer bear the opposition
118     Not,       2|           sense. He was, however, by no means a sceptic, for he
119     Not,       2|             insertion of tibi. I see no difficulty in the qui before
120     Not,       2|         intended than that there was no immediate or close connection.
121     Not,       2|               But say you, we desire no more. No I answer, you are
122     Not,       2|              you, we desire no more. No I answer, you are like the
123     Not,       2|            for Q. Geminus could have no infallible mode of recognising
124     Not,       2|      recognising Cotta. You say that no such indistinguishable resemblances
125     Not,       2|          mind and eyes agreed. It is no good to talk about the saner
126     Not,       2|           and Antiocheans, we desire no better senses than we have."
127     Not,       2|           Epicurus, in which however no mention of a foot occurs,
128     Not,       2|             makes a heap, B answers "No." A goes on asking whether
129     Not,       2|               B cannot always reply "No." When he begins to answer "
130     Not,       2|           one grain between heap and no heap. One grain therefore
131     Not,       2|            old Journal of Philology. No. 7. Iudicem ... non iudicem:
132     Not,       2|     συγχεομεν τον βιον. Et sensibus: no second et corresponds to
133     Not,       2|             180. Anaxagoras: he made no ‛ομοιομερειαι of snow, but
134     Not,       2|        opinions of philosophers, but no ex. so strong as this is
135     Not,       2|           give a qualified 'yes' or 'no,' dependent on probability."
136     Not,       2|          Carneades. I see absolutely no reason for the very severe
137     Not,       2|            be prepared to asseverate no less strongly that the sun
138     Not,       2|              things can be perceived no more and no less clearly
139     Not,       2|             be perceived no more and no less clearly than the size
140     Not,       2|              homogeneous throughout, no one thing could be more
141     Not,       2|            slight contrast, there is no need to read et, as Halm.
142     Not,       2|       sapiens (145). Now as there is no knowledge there can be no
143     Not,       2|            no knowledge there can be no art. How would Zeuxis and