bold = Main text
   Liber, Caput     grey = Comment text

 1     Pre         |   superior to that of Goerenz, is very deficient when judged by
 2     Pre         |          himself and Kayser. In a very few passages I have introduced
 3     Pre         |        from a conviction that the very excellence of the texts
 4     Pre         |            I have therefore added very many references from my
 5     Int,       I|         lectures he attended at a very early age, even before he
 6     Int,       I|          public affairs were in a very critical condition, and
 7     Int,       I|           belong to this time are very pathetic. Cicero several
 8     Int,       I|    curious to find Cicero, in the very midst of civil war, poring
 9     Int,      II|     philosophy, which was by that very freedom brought rapidly
10     Int,      II|           sinful; Cicero, who was very human in his joys and sorrows,
11     Int,      II|      Cicero's nature inclined him very strongly to sympathize with
12     Int,      II|           well aware of the fact.~Very few words are necessary
13     Int,      II|       schools. The former was not very powerfully represented during
14     Int,     III|        There seems to have been a very large Epicurean literature
15     Int,      IV|         wont to depend on Atticus very much for historical and
16     Int,      IV|             Cicero had never been very intimate with Varro: their
17     Int,      IV|           Cicero declared himself very much dissatisfied with Varro'
18     Int,      IV|           known the first edition very well206, but the second
19     Int,      IV|     masters of Latin style, it is very evident on a comparison
20     Int,      IV|        two are mentioned, that no very high value was placed on
21     Int,      IV|     probable that he touched only very lightly on the negative
22     Int,      IV|        the wisdom of Lucullus, is very dramatic283. The many political
23     Int,      IV|           the Academica to Varro, very slight alterations were
24     Int,      IV|           may observe that at the very outset of the work it is
25     Int,      IV|            forced and artificial; very different from the letters
26     Not,       1|       omission of locuti, cf. the very similar passages in D.F.
27     Not,       1|          Ea nolui scribere, etc.: very similar expressions occur
28     Not,       1|         where Cic.'s Latin agrees very closely with the Greek preserved
29     Not,       1|           philosophice occur till very late Latin times. Si modo
30     Not,       1|          σου διχα. Relictam: Cic. very rarely omits esse, see note
31     Not,       1|         where Cic. speaks of this very oracle (Cato Mai. 78, Lael.
32     Not,       1|           for ηθικη, etc. This is very characteristic of Cic.,
33     Not,       1|       naturalised. D.F. III. 5 is very similar. Cic.'s words make
34     Not,       1|     Chrysippus followed Aristotle very closely (R. and P. 377,
35     Not,       1|        the same doctrine, appears very absurd. We may reflect,
36     Not,       1|        desperate shifts. Cicero's very knowledge of Plato has,
37     Not,       1|          about Heraclitus; also a very similar passage in Orator
38     Not,       1|          suppose that he departed very widely from the Aristotelian
39     Not,       1|            In II. 134 Cic. speaks very differently of him. Between
40     Not,       1|        side of Zeno's nature. The very expression occurs Ad Fam.
41     Not,       1|          from αιθηρ, which is the very name that Aristotle gives
42     Not,       1|          of a Greek term causes a very similar anacoluthon in De
43     Not,       1|            37, De Fato, 42, 43 (a very important passage). The
44     Not,       1|          for καταληπτικη φαντασια very often. Quae manu prehenderentur:
45     Not,       1|        the Stoic texts; αμαθια is very seldom talked of there.
46     Not,       1|          460—357 B.C.) was really very little older than Socrates (
47     Not,       1|        writer the word ισοσθενεια very frequently occurs in the
48     Not,       2|           explanation seems to me very improbable. The words bear
49     Not,       2|          a different opinion, but very hesitatingly, p. 63.~16.
50     Not,       2|          fragm. 19 evidently hang very closely together. As Krische
51     Not,       2|   Posteriora. As this would leave very meagre material for Book
52     Not,       2|            and Antiochus. At that very time the books mentioned
53     Not,       2|         The form of expression is very common in Cic., and the
54     Not,       2|          oportuit: a construction very characteristic of Terence,
55     Not,       2|         of scepticism (13), Those very philosophers, with the exception
56     Not,       2|    omission of the verb venire is very common in Cic.'s letters.
57     Not,       2|    Posteriora 17, 43. De se ipse: very frequent in Cic. (cf. Madv.
58     Not,       2|           inconsistent, since the very dogma excludes the supposition
59     Not,       2|     Αποδειξις: cf. the definition very often given by Sext. e.g.
60     Not,       2|    grasped. Similar arguments are very frequent in Sextus, e.g.
61     Not,       2|        sit of the MSS. I think it very likely that the MSS. reading
62     Not,       2|         posse accidere: this is a very remarkable, and, as Madv. (
63     Not,       2|          of απανταν, which occurs very frequently in Sext. Sumpta:
64     Not,       2|        phantom sensation produces very often the same effect as
65     Not,       2|        Sextus pure syllogisms are very frequently called ερωτησεις,
66     Not,       2|          mostly colloquial and is very common in Plaut. and Terence,
67     Not,       2|         sibi (SVI for SIBI). B is very frequently written for V
68     Not,       2|          after truth, and on that very account hold it disgraceful
69     Not,       2|        limatas. Elimare, though a very rare word occurs Ad Att.
70     Not,       2|          which Or. added with two very early editions. Faber ingeniously
71     Not,       2|      deliverance of Anaxagoras is very often referred to by Sextus.
72     Not,       2|       οιδα ουδε οιομαι ειδεναι, a very different statement from
73     Not,       2|        and proposed virum esse, a very strange em. Halm's conj.
74     Not,       2|          video to cerno, which is very often found in Cic., e.g.
75     Not,       2|          X. 91, who preserves the very words of Epicurus, in which
76     Not,       2|           Two participles used in very different ways not unfrequently
77     Not,       2|        quaeritur: cf. 80 n. Sext. very often uses very similar
78     Not,       2|          n. Sext. very often uses very similar language, as in
79     Not,       2|      Epicurus would not allow the very first postulate of your
80     Not,       2|        can do and what it cannot. Very similar arguments to this
81     Not,       2|         insert and omit negatives very recklessly, so that the
82     Not,       2|          of modern times, rejects very many clauses of the kind
83     Not,       2|          in 148, which passage is very similar to this. Neget ...
84     Not,       2|      absolutely no reason for the very severe remarks of Madvig
85     Not,       2|       D.F. V. 76, a passage which very closely resembles ours.
86     Not,       2|    ducenda. These quaestiones are very often alluded to by Cic.
87     Not,       2|        Sed cum: sed often marks a very slight contrast, there is
88     Not,       2|         quae. But the se comes in very awkwardly, and is not needed
89     Not,       2| themselves cannot agree about the very elements of their art (143).