bold = Main text
     Liber, Caput          grey = Comment text

1501     Not,       2     |                   only uses the word once in the plural (Ad Att. II.
1502     Not,       2     |                  principle thus described in D.F. III. 14 erit notius
1503     Not,       2     |                 or κατ' ακριβειαν (passim in Sext. e.g. P.H. II. 123).
1504     Not,       2     |           Inaniterne moveatur: MSS. agree in ve for ne, on which see
1505     Not,       2     |                    on 47. Relinquitur: so in Sext. απολειπειν is constantly
1506     Not,       2     |                then you can have no faith in any appearance even if you
1507     Not,       2     |                 Cf. quam obscurari volunt in 42 and quo sublato in 33.
1508     Not,       2     |              volunt in 42 and quo sublato in 33. Argumentum: Cic. seems
1509     Not,       2     |               significatur: το σημειωντον in Sext.~§§37—40. Summary The
1510     Not,       2     |                 does away with all action in life (38, 39).~§37. Explicabamus:
1511     Not,       2     |                 21 and 30 (quae vis esset in sensibus). Inanimum: not
1512     Not,       2     |                  aliquid: I. 23. Quae est in nostra: Walker's insertion
1513     Not,       2     |          φαντασιωθηναι αβουλητον ην). For in potestate cf. De Fato 9,
1514     Not,       2     |                 Cedere: cf. εικειν, ειξις in Sext. P.H. I. 193, 230,
1515     Not,       2     |                esp. 20. Memoriam: cf. 22. In nostra potestate: this may
1516     Not,       2     |                  might have been produced in the same form by other things,
1517     Not,       2     |                 like; cf. ‛ωσπερ θεμελιος in Sext. A.M. V. 50. Artem:
1518     Not,       2     |                  Alia vera sunt: Numenius in Euseb. Pr. Ev. XIV. 8, 4
1519     Not,       2     |           Proposita: cf. προτασεις passim in Sext. In sensus: = in ea,
1520     Not,       2     |                 προτασεις passim in Sext. In sensus: = in ea, quae ad
1521     Not,       2     |              passim in Sext. In sensus: = in ea, quae ad sensus pertinent
1522     Not,       2     |                 quae a sensibus ducuntur. In singulisque rebus: the word
1523     Not,       2     |                things, to which the words in minima dispertiunt would
1524     Not,       2     |              μαλλον, which was constantly in the mouths of sceptics,
1525     Not,       2     |                     An Academic would say in reply to the question, "
1526     Not,       2     |            important, must also be known. In illa vera we have a pointed
1527     Not,       2     |                like that of veri et falsi in 33. In falsum: note that
1528     Not,       2     |                   of veri et falsi in 33. In falsum: note that falsum =
1529     Not,       2     |              unnecessary, cf. 42 dividunt in partis, T.D. III. 24, where
1530     Not,       2     |          essentially the same argument as in 33 at the end. Occurretur:
1531     Not,       2     |              which occurs very frequently in Sext. Sumpta: the two premisses
1532     Not,       2     |             Sumpta: the two premisses are in Gk. called together λημματα,
1533     Not,       2     |         εκκαλυπτικος, δηλωτικος (the last in Sext. A.M. VIII. 277) often
1534     Not,       2     |               A.M. VIII. 277) often recur in Greek. Primum esse ... nihil
1535     Not,       2     |              Carneades allowed that visa, in themselves, might be true
1536     Not,       2     |                  συναρτησις and explained in Sext. A.M. VIII. 430.~§45.
1537     Not,       2     |                    Praeteritis: here used in the strong participial sense, "
1538     Not,       2     |                strong participial sense, "in the class of things passed
1539     Not,       2     |                  things passed over," cf. in remissis Orat. 59. Primum
1540     Not,       2     |                 sensations are often seen in dreams, why then do you
1541     Not,       2     |               convertible. I may add that in Sextus pure syllogisms are
1542     Not,       2     |                    Dissolvere: απολυεσθαι in Sext. Occurrere: cf. 44.~§
1543     Not,       2     |        dialectician, affirmed of Epicurus in D.F. II. 27. Nulla sunt:
1544     Not,       2     |                 the use of nullus for non in Cic. cf. Madv. Gram. 455
1545     Not,       2     |             colloquial and is very common in Plaut. and Terence, while
1546     Not,       2     |                 Plaut. and Terence, while in Cic. it occurs mostly in
1547     Not,       2     |                  in Cic. it occurs mostly in the Letters. Inaniter: cf.
1548     Not,       2     |                    34. There are two ways in which a sensation may be
1549     Not,       2     |                   no reality at all. Quae in somnis videantur: for the
1550     Not,       2     |                only be properly explained in connection with 50 and with
1551     Not,       2     |                   the Academics expounded in 41. After long consideration
1552     Not,       2     |                 the proposition announced in 41 and 42 viz. omnibus veris
1553     Not,       2     |                 esse falsa. The criticism in 50 shows that the argument
1554     Not,       2     |                 as the Stoics say he does in dreams), why can he not
1555     Not,       2     |                sese: simply = inaniter as in 34, 47, i.e. without the
1556     Not,       2     |                Cogitatione: the only word in Latin, as διανοια is in
1557     Not,       2     |                   in Latin, as διανοια is in Greek, to express our "imagination."
1558     Not,       2     |                  the same purpose as that in the last section, viz to
1559     Not,       2     |                 the ut used several times in the early part of the sentence,
1560     Not,       2     |                   of falsa visa mentioned in n. on 47. Sin autem sunt,
1561     Not,       2     |                 true? The rest exactly as in 47.~§§49—53. Antiochus attacked
1562     Not,       2     |                   sensations we had while in it (51). But, say our opponents,
1563     Not,       2     |                   allow that the wise man in madness withholds his assent."
1564     Not,       2     |                nothing, for he will do so in many other circumstances
1565     Not,       2     |                  many other circumstances in life. All this talk about
1566     Not,       2     |                    Sext. often quotes him in the discussion of this and
1567     Not,       2     |                    the sorites was always in the form of a series of
1568     Not,       2     |                    read hos, which indeed in 136 is a necessary em. for
1569     Not,       2     |              instance of proximus quisque in De Off. II. 75. Vitium:
1570     Not,       2     |                   sunt was added by Madv. In suo genere essent: substitute
1571     Not,       2     |                   would allow that things in their essence are divisible
1572     Not,       2     |                 somniorum una ratio est). In quiete: = in somno, a rather
1573     Not,       2     |                  ratio est). In quiete: = in somno, a rather poetical
1574     Not,       2     |                 dream of Ennius, recorded in his Annals, is referred
1575     Not,       2     |                 II. 1, 50. Simul ut: rare in Cic., see Madv. D.F. II.
1576     Not,       2     |               unduly restricts the usage. In three out of the five passages
1577     Not,       2     |                   before a vowel, so that in D.F. II. 33 ut should probably
1578     Not,       2     |                  however is as impossible in Cic. as the c before a guttural
1579     Not,       2     |               before a guttural condemned in n. on 34. For the argument
1580     Not,       2     |                  effects," cf. αποβριζειν in Homer. Relaxentur: cf. ανιεναι
1581     Not,       2     |                Ran. 700, relaxare is used in the neut. sense in D.F.
1582     Not,       2     |                   used in the neut. sense in D.F. II. 94. Alcmaeonis:
1583     Not,       2     |                   the Academic remark lay in the fact that in the state
1584     Not,       2     |               remark lay in the fact that in the state of madness the
1585     Not,       2     |                  attempt to draw it, even in the sane condition. Confundere:
1586     Not,       2     |                 with," so χρησθαι is used in Gk. Ebriosorum: "habitual
1587     Not,       2     |                 thus introduced by itself in questions, a good ex. occurs
1588     Not,       2     |              questions, a good ex. occurs in 136. Proferremus: this must
1589     Not,       2     |                 as elliptic constructions in which a condition is expressed
1590     Not,       2     |                 We have an exact parallel in English, e.g. "tu dictis
1591     Not,       2     |             expressed without si, just as in Eng. without "if," cf. Iuv.
1592     Not,       2     |               suppressed protasis, but as in his Gram. 351 b, obs. 4
1593     Not,       2     |                  innumerable worlds exist in every particular similar
1594     Not,       2     |                 VII. 408—410. Negat esse: in phrases like this Cic. nearly
1595     Not,       2     |                  tale, quale est, nec est in duobus aut pluribus nulla
1596     Not,       2     |              change of ulla into nulla is in no way needed. Ut [sibi]
1597     Not,       2     |                clearly wrong here. Madv., in a note communicated privately
1598     Not,       2     |               Faber's em. novas for bonas in 72). This ingenious but,
1599     Not,       2     |                   Madv. has just repeated in the second vol. of his Adversaria.
1600     Not,       2     |                  frequently written for V in the MSS., and I would easily
1601     Not,       2     |                   and I would easily slip in. Eosdem: once more we have
1602     Not,       2     |               verbs often appear together in Cic., e.g.D.F. III. 25.~§
1603     Not,       2     |                   τεχνην, a set of rules. In proverbio: so venire in
1604     Not,       2     |                   In proverbio: so venire in proverbium, in proverbii
1605     Not,       2     |                  so venire in proverbium, in proverbii usum venire, proverbii
1606     Not,       2     |              discuss the nature of things in themselves, and kept to
1607     Not,       2     |                Intersit: i.e. inter visa. In animos: Orelli with one
1608     Not,       2     |                 wird klas sisch verbunden in aliqua re, nicht in aliquam
1609     Not,       2     |             verbunden in aliqua re, nicht in aliquam rem," will require
1610     Not,       2     |                   a sceptic. As it stands in the text the doctrine is
1611     Not,       2     |                  or some such word, comes in the following clause, as
1612     Not,       2     |                  the following clause, as in the famous passage of Cic
1613     Not,       2     |                 etiam: note iam and etiam in the same clause.~§60. Pro
1614     Not,       2     |            doctrine, must have originated in the reactionary period of
1615     Not,       2     |                   is noticeable, see exx. in Madv. Gram. 214 c.~§61.
1616     Not,       2     |                 either this is future, as in 109, or sequeris, the constant
1617     Not,       2     |               sequeris, the constant form in Cic. of the pres., must
1618     Not,       2     |                  64, where Madv. is wrong in reproving Torquatus for
1619     Not,       2     |           although they write deus aliqui in 19. It is difficult to distinguish
1620     Not,       2     |                  casus (De Off. III. 33). In the case of personal nouns
1621     Not,       2     |               book), magistratus aliquis (In Verr. IV. 146). With a proper
1622     Not,       2     |                 to be written (Myrmecides in 120, see my n.). Dispiciendum:
1623     Not,       2     |                  the similar use of actus in Quintilian (Inst. Or. X.
1624     Not,       2     |                  expression of Cic., used in the senate in reference
1625     Not,       2     |                  Cic., used in the senate in reference to Catiline's
1626     Not,       2     |                   and the passages quoted in Introd. p. 46 with respect
1627     Not,       2     |                  with respect to Catulus, in most of which Lucullus is
1628     Not,       2     |               than the use of ne alone as in vero falsone. Memoriter:
1629     Not,       2     |                    See Krebs and Allgayer in the Antibarbarus, ed. 4.
1630     Not,       2     |              μονον ου occurs nowhere else in Cic. Bait. therefore ejects
1631     Not,       2     |                  Tribunus: a retort comes in 97, 144. Antiochum: cf.
1632     Not,       2     |               protest my entire sincerity in all that I say, and would
1633     Not,       2     |         characteristic it is never to err in giving his assent (66).
1634     Not,       2     |                   to show that perception in the Stoic sense is impossible (
1635     Not,       2     |                  s Aratea, and are quoted in N.D. II. 105, 106. Phoenices:
1636     Not,       2     |                 the same course of action in D.F. III. 31. Cogitatione: "
1637     Not,       2     |          dogmatists by Sext. Praepostere: in a disorderly fashion, taking
1638     Not,       2     |            opinari ought to change places in this passage, as Manut.
1639     Not,       2     |             proposes. The difficulty lies in the words secundum illud,
1640     Not,       2     |                  these words MSS. om. Tam in praecipiti: for the position
1641     Not,       2     |           praecipiti: for the position of in cf. n. on I. 25. The best
1642     Not,       2     |                 best MSS. have here tamen in. Madv. altered tamen to
1643     Not,       2     |                Madv. altered tamen to tam in n. on D.F. V. 26. The two
1644     Not,       2     |              words are often confused, as in T.D. IV. 7, cf. also n.
1645     Not,       2     |                old arguments of Antiochus in favour of Academicism were
1646     Not,       2     |               Eadem dicit: on the subject in hand, of course. Taken without
1647     Not,       2     |                   The Novae Tabernae were in the forum, and are often
1648     Not,       2     |               mentioned by Cic. and Livy. In De Or. II. 266 a story is
1649     Not,       2     |                   b is frequently written in MSS. for v. Maenianorum:
1650     Not,       2     |                   The same usage is found in D.F. II. 60, T.D. IV. 9,
1651     Not,       2     |                   occurs not unfrequently in Cic., e g De Invent. II.
1652     Not,       2     |               inclined to write honestum, in apposition to nomen, cf.
1653     Not,       2     |                   reads his, "solet V. D. in hoc pronomen saevire," says
1654     Not,       2     |              Plato pursued the same theme in all his works (74). Now
1655     Not,       2     |              often referred to by Sextus. In P.H. I. 33 he quotes it
1656     Not,       2     |                   an obscure joke on this in Ad Qu. Fratrem II. 13, 1
1657     Not,       2     |         exaggerates the merits of Democr. in order to depreciate the
1658     Not,       2     |                 similar expressions occur in T.D. III. 42, V. 73, D.F.
1659     Not,       2     |                the proper use of quamquam in clauses where the verb is
1660     Not,       2     |                 use of quasi = almost cf. In Verr. Act. I. 22, Orat.
1661     Not,       2     |                 The words referred to are in Plat. Apol. 21 εοικα γουν
1662     Not,       2     |                and P. 148). That επιστημη in the strict sense is impossible,
1663     Not,       2     |               Ironiam: the word was given in its Greek form in 15. Nulla
1664     Not,       2     |                   given in its Greek form in 15. Nulla fuit ratio persequi:
1665     Not,       2     |                  etc., Halm nullum unquam in place of numquam. Bait.
1666     Not,       2     |                  177—182. σοφισματα: Cic. in the second edition probably
1667     Not,       2     |           Χρυσιππος, ουκ αν ην Στοα. Quae in consuetudine probantur:
1668     Not,       2     |                 tibi. I see no difficulty in the qui before negant, at
1669     Not,       2     |                  I believe does not occur in ancient authorities as a
1670     Not,       2     |              saeculis: cf. the same words in 15. Tot ingeniis tantisque
1671     Not,       2     |                 ingeniis, maximis studiis in 15. Obtrectandi: this invidious
1672     Not,       2     |                 had been used by Lucullus in 16; cf. also I. 44.~§77.
1673     Not,       2     |              construction with ita iudico in 113. Ex eo, quod esset:
1674     Not,       2     |               ellipse of excessive rarity in Cic., see Madv. Opusc. I.
1675     Not,       2     |                  For the omission of esse in that case cf. Madv. Gram.
1676     Not,       2     |                dicere solebat perturbatum in 111, also ita scribenti
1677     Not,       2     |                  ita scribenti exanclatum in 108. Recte, which with the
1678     Not,       2     |                   conduct would thus gain in point. Qy, should concessit
1679     Not,       2     |              should concessit be read, as in 118 concessisse is now read
1680     Not,       2     |               illud is meant the argument in defence of εποχη given in
1681     Not,       2     |                 in defence of εποχη given in 67; by nihil ... pertinebat
1682     Not,       2     |                  Cf. the use of pertinere in D.F. III. 55. Clitomacho:
1683     Not,       2     |                  You are wrong, Lucullus, in upholding your cause in
1684     Not,       2     |                   in upholding your cause in spite of my arguments yesterday
1685     Not,       2     |                   The whole question lies in a nutshell; of four propositions
1686     Not,       2     |             disprove your point (88, 89). In their case at least 'mind
1687     Not,       2     |                   seems to allude to this in his "Higher Pantheism"—"
1688     Not,       2     |                  is a straight staff bent in a pool". Manent illa omnia,
1689     Not,       2     |                    lacerat. Madv. Em. 176 in combating the conj. of Goer.
1690     Not,       2     |               into subjunctives, of which in critical editions of Cic.
1691     Not,       2     |                   use of dicit cf. inquit in 101, 109, 115). Hermann
1692     Not,       2     |               dicit to habes) occurs also in 101. Epicurus: n. on 19.~§
1693     Not,       2     |                  as meaning fair, candid, in this explanation I concur.
1694     Not,       2     |                   concur. Madv., however, in his critical epistle to
1695     Not,       2     |            improbable. Importune: this is in one good MS. but the rest
1696     Not,       2     |                   to discuss about things in themselves but merely dealt
1697     Not,       2     |                 πραγμασι συνεχωρει (Numen in Euseb. Pr. Eu. XIV. 8).
1698     Not,       2     |            agerent. As the insertion of n in the imp. subj. is so common
1699     Not,       2     |                   imp. subj. is so common in MSS. I read ageret and alter
1700     Not,       2     |                 which is very often found in Cic., e.g. Orat. 18. Cic.
1701     Not,       2     |            however joins the two verbs as in De Or. III. 161. O praeclarum
1702     Not,       2     |                 qui: Goer. is quite wrong in saying that nescio quis
1703     Not,       2     |             nescio qui does not, cf. Div. in qu. Caec. 47, where nescio
1704     Not,       2     |                aliqui, on which see 61 n. In Paradoxa 12 the best MSS.
1705     Not,       2     |                 si qui and si quis almost in the same line with identically
1706     Not,       2     |                 had some particular thing in mind, cf. Madv. Gram. 364,
1707     Not,       2     |                 read acutius as Goer. did in 69. Illos pisces: so some
1708     Not,       2     |                   passage, follows Christ in reading desiderant (i.e.
1709     Not,       2     |                 the same illustration, as in P.H. I. 107, A.M. VII. 414.
1710     Not,       2     |                Gram. 42. Duodeviginti: so in 128. Goer. and Roeper qu.
1711     Not,       2     |                   very words of Epicurus, in which however no mention
1712     Not,       2     |                  Nihil aut non multum: so in D.F. V. 59, the correction
1713     Not,       2     |          Antibarbarus ed. 4 on quin.~§83. In parvo lis sit: Durand's
1714     Not,       2     |                 sit: Durand's em. for the in parvulis sitis of the MSS.,
1715     Not,       2     |                  capita: these were given in 40 by Lucullus, cf. also
1716     Not,       2     |               also 77. Epicurus: as above in 19, 79 etc.~§84. Geminum:
1717     Not,       2     |                   of this belief is found in Seneca Ep.. 113, 13, qu.
1718     Not,       2     |                 same opinion is expressed in 40, where see my note. Visa
1719     Not,       2     |                necessary, however, either in Gk. or Lat. to express both
1720     Not,       2     |                the elliptic constructions in Gk. with ‛ομοιον, μεταξυ,
1721     Not,       2     |                  and water were important in the making of statues. For
1722     Not,       2     |                   I conj. ascra, or atque in, which last leading would
1723     Not,       2     |                    Pictor ... tibicen: so in 20. Simul inflavit: note
1724     Not,       2     |                  B relates that Carneades in reading the arguments of
1725     Not,       2     |                thus parodied the line qu. in n. on 75, ει μη γαρ ην Χρυσιππος
1726     Not,       2     |                 εγω.~§88. Diligentissime: in 48—53. Dicebas: in 52 imbecillius
1727     Not,       2     |        Diligentissime: in 48—53. Dicebas: in 52 imbecillius adsentiuntur.
1728     Not,       2     |                 meaning "to be drunk," as in Plaut. Mostellaria I. 4,
1729     Not,       2     |                    The omission of a verb in the subjunctive is, Madv.
1730     Not,       2     |                 reri, which verb occurred in I. 26, 39. Possibly putare,
1731     Not,       2     |          vigilantis. Two participles used in very different ways not
1732     Not,       2     |                   the use of this pronoun in interrogative sentences
1733     Not,       2     |                  out that Protagoras must in accordance with his doctrine
1734     Not,       2     |                    Lat. rel. p. 205. Cic. in De Or. III. 162 thus continues
1735     Not,       2     |                  lumen radiatum rape." So in Soph. Aiax 100 the hero,
1736     Not,       2     |               keeps Odysseus alive awhile in order to torture him. Hercules:
1737     Not,       2     |           Moveretur: imperf. for plup. as in 90. Alcmaeo tuus: cf. 52.
1738     Not,       2     |                anguis fem is not uncommon in the old poetry. MSS. here
1739     Not,       2     |             innixus: the separate mention in the next line of Diana,
1740     Not,       2     |                 very similar language, as in P.H. I. 22, qu. in n. on
1741     Not,       2     |           language, as in P.H. I. 22, qu. in n. on 40. Tum cum movebantur:
1742     Not,       2     |             arguments which are identical in form with the Mentiens,
1743     Not,       2     |                   of your Dialectic (97). In my opinion, and I learned
1744     Not,       2     |               arguments identical with it in form must stand or fall
1745     Not,       2     |                Inventam esse: cf. 26, 27. In geometriane: with this inquiry
1746     Not,       2     |                the inquiry about Rhetoric in Plato Gorg. 453 D, 454 C.
1747     Not,       2     |                   quotes Plato's remarks (in Rep. II.) that the Expert
1748     Not,       2     |           arguments to this of Cic. occur in Sext., cf. esp. P.H. II.
1749     Not,       2     |                εκκαλυπτικον. For the mode in which Carneades dealt with
1750     Not,       2     |                  Knowledge, now reprinted in Vol II. of his Aristotle.~§
1751     Not,       2     |               συλλογιζεσθαι. Locum: τοπον in the philosophical sense.
1752     Not,       2     |               such sophisms lies entirely in the treatment of purely
1753     Not,       2     |                   the same ellipse occurs in Orator 73. In acervo tritici:
1754     Not,       2     |              ellipse occurs in Orator 73. In acervo tritici: this is
1755     Not,       2     |                inference is still treated in books on logic, cf. Thomson'
1756     Not,       2     |           Heindorf's note on κατα σμικρον in Sophistes 217 D. Interrogati:
1757     Not,       2     |                  D. Interrogati: cf. 104. In 94 we have interroganti,
1758     Not,       2     |                    habemus: I bracket non in deference to Halm, Madv.
1759     Not,       2     |                 of anacoluthon, comparing In Vatin. 3, Ad Fam. XII. 24.
1760     Not,       2     |                  doubtful.~§93. Frangite: in later Gk. generally απολυειν.
1761     Not,       2     |                   sentence is illustrated in Madv. D.F. III. 70, Em.
1762     Not,       2     |                    59 quot incommoda tibi in hac re capies nisi caves,
1763     Not,       2     |          Chrysippo: he spent so much time in trying to solve the sophism
1764     Not,       2     |                   sint: cf. the instances in Sext. A.M. VII. 418 τα πεντηκοντα
1765     Not,       2     |            ησυχαζειν the advice is quoted in Sext. P.H. II. 253 (δειν ‛
1766     Not,       2     |                       respondere: "to put in as your answer" cf. the
1767     Not,       2     |          defendere with an accus. "to put in as a plea". Kayser suggests
1768     Not,       2     |               letter to Atticus XIII. 21, in which Cic. discusses different
1769     Not,       2     |                which verb is hardly found in prose. The phrase superbe
1770     Not,       2     |                  phrase superbe resistere in Aug. Contra Ac. III. 14
1771     Not,       2     |                with some probability adds in, comparing in decimo below,
1772     Not,       2     |            probability adds in, comparing in decimo below, and 107, cf.
1773     Not,       2     |                parallel expressions occur in T.D. V. 76, De Or. I. 43,
1774     Not,       2     |                  II. 253 points the moral in the same way. Augentis nec
1775     Not,       2     |             αξιωμα: "a judgment expressed in language"; cf. Zeller 107,
1776     Not,       2     |                 this spelling was antique in Cic.'s time and only used
1777     Not,       2     |                 Cic.'s time and only used in connection with religious
1778     Not,       2     |           religious and legal formulae as in De Div. I. 81, De Leg. II.
1779     Not,       2     |                 enuntiatum, alii edictum, in T.D. I. 14 pronuntiatum
1780     Not,       2     |                 14 pronuntiatum is found, in De Fato 26 pronuntiatio,
1781     Not,       2     |                  De Fato 26 pronuntiatio, in Gellius XVI. 8 (from Varro)
1782     Not,       2     |                VII. 65 and other passages in Zeller 107. Mentiris an
1783     Not,       2     |                dico? The sophism is given in a more formally complete
1784     Not,       2     |                   formally complete shape in De Div. II. 11 where the
1785     Not,       2     |          declarare? Inexplicabilia: απορα in the Greek writers. Odiosius:
1786     Not,       2     |            annoying." Non comprehensa: as in 99, the opposite of comprehendibilia
1787     Not,       2     |                   1, 41. The past partic. in Cic. often has the same
1788     Not,       2     |                   same meaning as an adj. in -bilis. Faber points out
1789     Not,       2     |              bilis. Faber points out that in the Timaeus Cic. translates
1790     Not,       2     |                one would expect, is found in Ovid.~§96. Si dicis: etc.
1791     Not,       2     |                  Si dicis: etc. the words in italics are needed, and
1792     Not,       2     |               comic writers is untenable. In docendo: docere is not to
1793     Not,       2     |                   word modus is technical in this sense cf. Top. 57.
1794     Not,       2     |               involving only one premise) in Sext. P.H. I. 152, 159,
1795     Not,       2     |                  root of the sophism lies in the confusion of past and
1796     Not,       2     |                  of past and present time in the one infinitive mentiri.
1797     Not,       2     |                and the affirmative—called in Greek ‛ηγουμενον and ληγον;
1798     Not,       2     |            refused to admit this is given in De Fato 21 Epicurus veretur
1799     Not,       2     |                the frequent use of βραδυς in Sext., e.g. A.M. VII. 325.
1800     Not,       2     |                 εναντιων.~§98. Sequor: as in 95, 96, where the Dialectici
1801     Not,       2     |                Tisias, for which see Cope in the old Journal of Philology.
1802     Not,       2     |                  this construction, which in Greek would be marked by
1803     Not,       2     |                  same construction occurs in 103. Esse conexum: with
1804     Not,       2     |              copyists.~§§98—105. Summary. In order to overthrow at once
1805     Not,       2     |               will follow probability, as in many instances the Stoic
1806     Not,       2     |                   similar expressions are in T.D. II. 42, III. 22, D.F.
1807     Not,       2     |                meaning is given by the ut in passages like De Div. II.
1808     Not,       2     |                  a moment, that Carneades in any way upheld καταληψις?
1809     Not,       2     |                  probabile: the si is not in MSS. Halm and also Bait.
1810     Not,       2     |                  also Bait. follow Christ in reading est, probabile nihil
1811     Not,       2     |                 nihil esse. Commemorabas: in 53, 58. Eversio: cf. D.F.
1812     Not,       2     |            example;" so iam is often used in Lucretius. Probo ... bono:
1813     Not,       2     |               when pure and deep, is dark in colour. Concreta: so Manut.
1814     Not,       2     |               Manut. for MSS. congregata. In 121 the MSS. give concreta
1815     Not,       2     |            concreta without variation, as in N.D. II. 101, De Div. I.
1816     Not,       2     |                  n. Movebitur: cf. moveri in 24. Non enim est: Cic. in
1817     Not,       2     |                 in 24. Non enim est: Cic. in the vast majority of cases
1818     Not,       2     |              Lucullus and of Nonius agree in the other form, which Madv.
1819     Not,       2     |               which Madv. allows to stand in D.F. I. 43, and many other
1820     Not,       2     |                χαρακτηρα της συγκταθεσεως in Sext. P.H. I. 191. For the
1821     Not,       2     |                  V. 39), patria loquitur (In Cat. I. 18, 27); the last
1822     Not,       2     |                 use Cic. condemns himself in Orat. 85. Inquit: "quotha,"
1823     Not,       2     |                 quotha," indefinitely, as in 109, 115; cf. also dicit
1824     Not,       2     |                  109, 115; cf. also dicit in 79.~§102. Reprehensio est ...
1825     Not,       2     |                vobis: Bait. follows Madv. in placing a comma after est,
1826     Not,       2     |                   probabilia. Tamen ought in that case to follow dicimus,
1827     Not,       2     |                 and it is noteworthy that in his communication to Halm (
1828     Not,       2     |                altogether, nor does Bait. in adopting the suggestion
1829     Not,       2     |             omitted with the same constr. in D.F. V. 79, 80. Nusquam
1830     Not,       2     |               notices a certain looseness in the use of tenses, which
1831     Not,       2     |               tenses, which Cic. displays in narrating the opinions of
1832     Not,       2     |                 brackets a similar clause in 20, and is followed in both
1833     Not,       2     |             clause in 20, and is followed in both instances by Bait.
1834     Not,       2     |                  many clauses of the kind in the Oratorical works. In
1835     Not,       2     |                  in the Oratorical works. In our passage, the difficulty
1836     Not,       2     |                 probability. For example, in 29 the words have the first
1837     Not,       2     |                   have the first meaning, in 66 the second. The same
1838     Not,       2     |                   assent or disagreement (in either of the two senses
1839     Not,       2     |                   same as that of Hermann in the Philologus (vol. VII.),
1840     Not,       2     |                see my note on non probans in 148, which passage is very
1841     Not,       2     |                  prefer sic ut, taking ut in the sense of "although."
1842     Not,       2     |            although." Respondere: "to put in as an answer," as in 93
1843     Not,       2     |                  put in as an answer," as in 93 and often. Approbari:
1844     Not,       2     |                   construction are common in Cic., and I cannot follow
1845     Not,       2     |                  and I cannot follow Halm in altering the reading to
1846     Not,       2     |                the question nihil cernis? in 102. Purpureum: cf. fragm.
1847     Not,       2     |             caeruleum tum lavum (the MSS. in our passage have flavum)
1848     Not,       2     |                   a similar line is taken in 81.~§106. Memoria: cf. 22.
1849     Not,       2     |                   the present difficulty; in Plato the confusion is frequent,
1850     Not,       2     |            confusion is frequent, notably in the Sophistes and Theaetetus.
1851     Not,       2     |                  and νοησις is dealt with in exactly the same way by
1852     Not,       2     |             oportet, as after necesse est in 39. For facere followed
1853     Not,       2     |                   as Halm says, some noun in the plur. is needed. Quod
1854     Not,       2     |             ullius rei: n. on actio rerum in 62, cf. also 148. Adsensu
1855     Not,       2     |                  same phrase often occurs in Livy, Sueton., etc. see
1856     Not,       2     |                  force of Eng. "indeed", "in what indeed assent consists."
1857     Not,       2     |                 Sensus ipsos adsensus: so in I. 41 sensus is defined
1858     Not,       2     |               whether Cic. ever wrote -is in the gen. of the Greek names
1859     Not,       2     |                   gen. of the Greek names in -es. When we consider how
1860     Not,       2     |             προπετειαν, εικαιοτητα.~§109. In navigando: cf. 100. In conserendo:
1861     Not,       2     |                    In navigando: cf. 100. In conserendo: Guretus interprets "
1862     Not,       2     |                 agrum cf. n. on tollendum in 148. Sequere: the fut. not
1863     Not,       2     |                   comprehendi. Saltem: so in 29. Pingue: cf. Pro Archia
1864     Not,       2     |                 generally make ipse agree in case with the reflexive,
1865     Not,       2     |             referring to altero quo neget in 111, which however does
1866     Not,       2     |                  i.e. the decreta implied in the last sentence. Some
1867     Not,       2     |              noting at the same time that in such exx. neither ita nor
1868     Not,       2     |             alterum: cf. 44. Esse quaedam in visis: it was not the esse
1869     Not,       2     |          expressions like this are common in Cic., e.g. D.F. I. 54, De
1870     Not,       2     |                  Aug. Cont. Ac. III. 5 ne in quaestionis campis tua eqitaret
1871     Not,       2     |          resembles ours. Dumeta: same use in N.D. I. 68, Aug. Cont. Ac.
1872     Not,       2     |                    simpliciter—subtilitas in I. 6. Ne Carneade quidem:
1873     Not,       2     |                   verum: visum omitted as in D.F. V. 76. Incognito: cf.
1874     Not,       2     |                   this verb is often used in connection with the ethical
1875     Not,       2     |                117. Artificium: = ars, as in 30. Nusquam labar: cf. 138
1876     Not,       2     |                   of the Peripatetics, as in D.F. IV. 5, V. 7. Sustinuero:
1877     Not,       2     |                   of them and of Epicurus in this patronising way; see
1878     Not,       2     |           subjunctive from the indicative in clauses like these that
1879     Not,       2     |                  must believe as strongly in the Stoic theology as he
1880     Not,       2     |                 Stoic theology as he does in the sunlight. If he holds
1881     Not,       2     |               Democritus. I see some good in Strato, yet I will not assent
1882     Not,       2     |                 is firmly fixed or hovers in mid air (122). Xenophanes,
1883     Not,       2     |              Ethics, I note your weakness in placing all perceptions
1884     Not,       2     |                   at; cf. a similar break in 40 sed prius, also in 128
1885     Not,       2     |               break in 40 sed prius, also in 128 at paulum ante. Such
1886     Not,       2     |                   Such breaks often occur in Cic., as in Orator 87 sed
1887     Not,       2     |                   often occur in Cic., as in Orator 87 sed nunc aliud,
1888     Not,       2     |                  irresistibly. Initia: as in 118, bases of proof, themselves
1889     Not,       2     |              incapable of proof, so αρχαι in Gk. Digitum: cf. 58, 143.
1890     Not,       2     |                   hill. Nulla crassitudo: in Sext. the επιφανεια is usually
1891     Not,       2     |                  that the line is defined in Greek as μηκος απλατες. (
1892     Not,       2     |              remark that a verb is wanted in this clause as in the other
1893     Not,       2     |                  wanted in this clause as in the other two, he suggests
1894     Not,       2     |                ius iurandum will be found in Caes. Bell. Civ. I. 76,
1895     Not,       2     |                them. Cicero is arguing as in 128 against the absurdity
1896     Not,       2     |                    nec ille iurare posset in 123. Multis partibus: for
1897     Not,       2     |                Vim: = αναγκην, cf. cogere in 116. Ne ille: this asseverative
1898     Not,       2     |              closely joined with pronouns in Cic. Sententiam eliget et:
1899     Not,       2     |               often alluded to by Cic. as in D.F. I. 12, IV. 6, De Or.
1900     Not,       2     |                  physici the student must in general be referred to R.
1901     Not,       2     |                  of schools will be found in Sext. P.H. III. 30 sq. Our
1902     Not,       2     |                  cannot be genuine, since in it the supremacy among the
1903     Not,       2     |               this is opposed to infinita in Topica 79, so definire is
1904     Not,       2     |               definire is used for finire in Orat. 65, where Jahn qu.
1905     Not,       2     |         Anaxagoras given from Diog. II. 6 in R. and P. 29 παντα χρηματα
1906     Not,       2     |                      deum: Eleaticism was in the hands of Xenoph. mainly
1907     Not,       2     |                    cf. neque ortum unquam in 119. Parmenides ignem: cf.
1908     Not,       2     |                  used of those vanquished in a fight, cf. Hor. Sat. I.
1909     Not,       2     |                  vera quam falsa cernimus in 111. Flumen aureum: Plut.
1910     Not,       2     |                the opinion are treated of in Zeller 175, N.D. II. 91—
1911     Not,       2     |                   II. 91—127. They supply in Sext. P.H. I. 32, III. 9—
1912     Not,       2     |             artist, famed for minute work in ivory, and especially for
1913     Not,       2     |                 optanda est, non est enim in nobis, i.e. a good voice
1914     Not,       2     |                    ευχη μαλλον η αληθεια, in Sext. P.H. VIII. 353. Magno
1915     Not,       2     |                    116), but magnum opus, in the sense of "a great task,"
1916     Not,       2     |          Αντιποδας: this doctrine appears in Philolaus (see Plut. Plac.
1917     Not,       2     |                theory as Pythagorean, but in another passage (III. 24)
1918     Not,       2     |             αντιπους seems to occur first in Plat. Tim. 63 A. The existence
1919     Not,       2     |                    which is held by Plat. in the Tim. and by the Stoics,
1920     Not,       2     |                 It seems also to be found in Philolaus, see R. and P.
1921     Not,       2     |                  Epic. was prepared to go in estimating the sun's size,
1922     Not,       2     |                 however ne maiorem quidem in 82. Aristo Chius: for this
1923     Not,       2     |                 ancient theories is given in T.D. I. 18—22, and by Sext.
1924     Not,       2     |                 VII. 113, who also speaks in P.H. II. 31 of the πολλη
1925     Not,       2     |                 μαχη concerning the soul. In P.H. II. 57 he says Γοργιας
1926     Not,       2     |                  T.D. I. 21. Tres partis: in Plato's Republic. Ignis:
1927     Not,       2     |                   Sanguis: Empodocles, as in T.D. I. 19 where his famous
1928     Not,       2     |           doctrine of Xenocrates is given in R. and P. 244. Quod intellegi
1929     Not,       2     |                   Quod intellegi etc.: so in T.D. I. 41 quod subtiliter
1930     Not,       2     |                   animum: a common phrase in Cic., cf. Philipp. XII.
1931     Not,       2     |                  Queru potissimum? quem?: In repeated questions of this
1932     Not,       2     |                case of quisnam, not quis, in the second question, as
1933     Not,       2     |                   the second question, as in Verr. IV. 5. The mutation
1934     Not,       2     |              deity" who was of course one in the Stoic system. Ether
1935     Not,       2     |                 Pabulum: similar language in D.F. II. 46. Consideratio
1936     Not,       2     |                with Lamb. reads altiores, in support of which reading
1937     Not,       2     |                secum: cf. nobiscum ageret in 80. Simile veri: cf. 66.
1938     Not,       2     |                   sed.; cf. at illud ante in 116. Si quae: Halm and many
1939     Not,       2     |                    quae. But the se comes in very awkwardly, and is not
1940     Not,       2     |                 same level. Non magis: so in 119 nec magis approbabit
1941     Not,       2     |              Cornix: for the Stoic belief in divination see Zeller 349—
1942     Not,       2     |                   two genitives depending in different ways on the same
1943     Not,       2     |                  Or. III. 156. Other exx. in M.D.F. I. 14. For the turn
1944     Not,       2     |                 can I accept those points in which Antiochus and Zeno
1945     Not,       2     |                142).~§129. Quod coeperam: in 128 at veniamus nunc ad
1946     Not,       2     |                  and Madv. Est igitur: so in De Div. II. 8, igitur comes
1947     Not,       2     |                  igitur comes fourth word in the clause; this is not
1948     Not,       2     |              clause; this is not uncommon in Cic., as in Lucretius. Omitto:
1949     Not,       2     |                  not uncommon in Cic., as in Lucretius. Omitto: MSS.
1950     Not,       2     |                    pro simplici 'omitto,' in initio huius modi orationis
1951     Not,       2     |               perhaps to be sui simile as in Tim. c. 7, already quoted
1952     Not,       2     |              Chian ib. 358, Zeller 58 sq. In mediis: cf. I. 36, 37. Momenta =
1953     Not,       2     |            Momenta = aestimationes, αξιαι in 36, where momenti is used
1954     Not,       2     |                 36, where momenti is used in a different way. Pyrrho
1955     Not,       2     |               Pyrrhoni as Dav. conj., but in 124 there is just the same
1956     Not,       2     |                 scarcely occurs if at all in Sext. who generally uses
1957     Not,       2     |                   rule to write Calliphon in the nom; for this see Madv.
1958     Not,       2     |               D.F. II. 19, 35, 41, V. 14, in which last place Cic. says
1959     Not,       2     |                 19. Honeste vivere, etc.: in D.F. IV. 14 the finis of
1960     Not,       2     |          attributed to the vetus Academia in I. 22, where the words aut
1961     Not,       2     |                doctrines were to be found in Polemo; see I. 34, n. Eiusque
1962     Not,       2     |            Carneades: this finis is given in D.F. II. 35 (frui principiis
1963     Not,       2     |                 he did not include virtus in it (see D.F. II. 38, 42,
1964     Not,       2     |                 princeps: same expression in T.D. I. 48, De Or. I. 91,
1965     Not,       2     |                 line of argument is taken in Sext. P.H. I. 88, II. 32,
1966     Not,       2     |                  finis terminus possessio in De Leg. I. 55, 56, a noteworthy
1967     Not,       2     |             Academicos et: MSS. om. et as in I. 16, and que in 52 of
1968     Not,       2     |                   et as in I. 16, and que in 52 of this book. Dicenda:
1969     Not,       2     |           gerundive (which occurs chiefly in emphatic clauses) cf. I.
1970     Not,       2     |              letters were first dropt, as in 26 (tenetur) and that then
1971     Not,       2     |                passed into adsentiens, as in 147 intellegat se passed
1972     Not,       2     |                    is frequently inserted in MSS. (as in I. 7 appellant,
1973     Not,       2     |           frequently inserted in MSS. (as in I. 7 appellant, 16 disputant,
1974     Not,       2     |                  all the changes involved in my conj. are of frequent
1975     Not,       2     |                 to press home the dilemma in which Cicero has placed
1976     Not,       2     |                   and Bait., follow Moser in writing Quid? si quae removing
1977     Not,       2     |                   stop at paria, and make in utramque partem follow dicantur,
1978     Not,       2     |                  often omit one. Dicebas: in 27. Incognito: 133.~§134.
1979     Not,       2     |                 sibi constet: Cic. argues in T.D. V. that there cannot
1980     Not,       2     |                   there cannot be degrees in happiness. Tum hoc ... tum
1981     Not,       2     |               illud: cf. 121. Iacere: 79. In his discrepant: I. 42 in
1982     Not,       2     |                  In his discrepant: I. 42 in his constitit.~§135. Moveri:
1983     Not,       2     |             followed the reading of Madv. in his Em., not the one he
1984     Not,       2     |                   he gives (after Davies) in D.F. ne patria deleatur,
1985     Not,       2     |              Mediocritates: μεσοπετες, as in Aristotle; cf. T.D. III.
1986     Not,       2     |                   Spalding wished to read in Herodoti, supplying libro.
1987     Not,       2     |                 diminutives come together in Cic., and the usage is rather
1988     Not,       2     |               Stoic paradoxes is affirmed in Parad. 4, T.D. III. 10.
1989     Not,       2     |                παραδοξα by admirabilia as in D.F. IV. 74, or admiranda,
1990     Not,       2     |                    the Antiochean opinion in I. 18, 22. Solos reges:
1991     Not,       2     |                 Ad senatum starent: "were in waiting on the senate;"
1992     Not,       2     |                 the vocative is Carneades in De Div. I. 23. Huic Stoico:
1993     Not,       2     |                   noster: Dav. vester, as in 143 noster Antiochus. But
1994     Not,       2     |                 143 noster Antiochus. But in both places Cic. speaks
1995     Not,       2     |                   often come together, as in D.F. I. 44; cf. also D.F.
1996     Not,       2     |                   Cum honestate: Callipho in 131. Prima naturae commoda:
1997     Not,       2     |             naturae commoda: Cic. here as in D.F. IV. 59, V. 58 confuses
1998     Not,       2     |                   19. More on the subject in Madvig's fourth Excursus
1999     Not,       2     |               Labor eo: cf. Horace's nunc in Aristippi furtim praecepta
2000     Not,       2     |                   a reference to Epicurus in De Off. I. 105, Lael. 20,