bold = Main text
   Liber, Caput     grey = Comment text

 1     Int,       I|          age, he had been brought into intimate connection with
 2     Int,       I|     usually supposed that he came into collision with Sulla through
 3     Int,       I| themselves to inquire too closely into their intrinsic value. I
 4     Int,      II|         be indispensable to enter into a detailed historical examination
 5     Int,      II|        was impossible. To go more into detail here would be to
 6     Int,      II|          has introduced confusion into these subjects, to be silent97.
 7     Int,      II| unimpaired even if he were thrust into the bull of Phalaris103.
 8     Int,      II|           to the strange oblivion into which the most important
 9     Int,     III|        the best Greek speculation into the most elegant Latin form,
10     Int,     III|          nation has been diverted into other channels that so little
11     Int,      IV|           plunge at early morning into the dense woods near his
12     Int,      IV|        the introduction of Balbus into some editions of the fragments
13     Int,      IV|   Academica, which he now divided into four books instead of two,
14     Int,      IV|           should not have entered into correspondence with Varro
15     Int,      IV|         After the work had passed into his hands, Cicero begged
16     Int,      IV|           prevent it from getting into circulation until they could
17     Int,      IV|           edition had already got into Varro's hands, as we learn
18     Int,      IV|          I now proceed to examine into the constitution and arrangement
19     Int,      IV|         therefore for once admits into his works an impossibility
20     Not,       1|      Having introduced philosophy into that kind of literature
21     Not,       1|         proceeded to introduce it into that which the learned read."
22     Not,       1|        Antiquitatum" were divided into two parts, one treating
23     Not,       1|       from 26. Varro's researches into the Latin tongue are meant.
24     Not,       1|   instance of oversight. It crept into the text of Goer. by mistake,
25     Not,       1|           make Greek nouns in -ης into Latin nouns in -a. See M.
26     Not,       1|  threefold division of philosophy into ηθικη, φυσικη, διαλεκτικη.
27     Not,       1|       then the mental, which fall into two classes, congenital
28     Not,       1|        was probably first brought into strong prominence by the
29     Not,       1|       Polemo, from whom it passed into Stoic hands and then into
30     Not,       1|         into Stoic hands and then into those of Antiochus. Adeptum
31     Not,       1|      merge the two last divisions into one in Aug. De Civ. Dei
32     Not,       1|    Aristotle's, who severs αρεται into διανοητικαι and ηθικαι (
33     Not,       1|        with the division of αγαθα into ποιητικα and φυλακτικα,
34     Not,       1|      potentially τοδε τι, passing into actual τοδε τι, when affected
35     Not,       1|          to the passing of things into nothing and their reparation
36     Not,       1|           as merely an absorption into the Universal World God,
37     Not,       1|          either too small to come into the domain of sense, or
38     Not,       1|         really divided sensations into true and false. I believe
39     Not,       1|           other things he divided into three classes, some were
40     Not,       1|   dialectic he analysed sensation into two parts, an impulse from
41     Not,       1|      Sensations (visa) he divided into the true and the untrue;
42     Not,       1|         divided the nature of man into two parts, the intellectual
43     Not,       1|           of Aristotle had fallen into a strange oblivion. I cannot
44     Not,       2|          also changed Puteolosque into pisciculosque exultantes
45     Not,       2|        the second edition changed into the former may be supported
46     Not,       2|        therefore divided the Luc. into two portions at or about
47     Not,       2|          should not be introduced into dialogues of the kind. Are
48     Not,       2|         by Catulus yesterday came into the hands of Antiochus,
49     Not,       2|          by conj. a sad confusion into the text, but no other good
50     Not,       2|      vetera and changes incognita into incondita, comparing De
51     Not,       2|         Orelli) supposes and gets into difficulty thereby, but
52     Not,       2|           throw the whole of life into confusion (31). Some sceptics
53     Not,       2|           they divide perceptions into those which are sensations,
54     Not,       2|           absurd to divide things into those which can be perceived (
55     Not,       2|         two sensations are merged into one, but merely that when
56     Not,       2|       their essence are divisible into sharply-defined genera,
57     Not,       2|        Goer., Orelli, Klotz alter into narrat, most wantonly. Visus
58     Not,       2|         childish (54). They press into their service the old physical
59     Not,       2|          of philosophy, plunge us into more than Cimmerian darkness? (
60     Not,       2|           put the two verbs (est) into the subjunctive. The change
61     Not,       2|   subjunctive. The change of ulla into nulla is in no way needed.
62     Not,       2|          and ut and changing visi into sibi (cf. Faber's em. novas
63     Not,       2|         word. Most edd. change it into denotatas. Artem: τεχνην,
64     Not,       2|        not on that account be led into a mistake for our rule will
65     Not,       2|      written nobas, and then pass into bonas. Nivem nigram: this
66     Not,       2|        the alteration of Cyrenaei into Cyrenaici (now made by all
67     Not,       2|         77. Expresserat: "had put into distinct shape". Cf. 7 and
68     Not,       2|         will throw all the others into uncertainty (84). You say
69     Not,       2|           for turning indicatives into subjunctives, of which in
70     Not,       2|        iacet were by error turned into iaceret the reading lacerat
71     Not,       2|     Quererer cum deo: would enter into an altercation with the
72     Not,       2|    geometriane: with this inquiry into the special function of
73     Not,       2|       which merges φως and ‛ημερα into one word, or that of Zeller (
74     Not,       2|        two divisions of visa, one into those capable of being perceived
75     Not,       2|         not so capable, the other into probable and improbable.
76     Not,       2|        Carneades as dividing visa into those which can be perceived
77     Not,       2|          to change the rarer form into the commoner, also that
78     Not,       2|      absurdity is by Cic. brought into strong relief by stating
79     Not,       2|      after decempeda, Madv. turns into hunc, while hoc, which stands
80     Not,       2|           the s following, passed into adsentiens, as in 147 intellegat
81     Not,       2|          147 intellegat se passed into intelligentes. N, I may
82     Not,       2|         etc.) analysed sensations into two parts; with the Academic