bold = Main text
   Liber, Caput     grey = Comment text

 1     Int,      II|      writings. I may instance one passage in the beginning of the
 2     Int,      II|          not, and in a remarkable passage Cicero agrees with them,
 3     Int,     III|        cause, as indeed he in one passage seems to allow, must have
 4     Int,      IV|       question is made clear by a passage in the De Oratore140, [xxxiii]
 5     Int,      IV|         while in that state153. A passage in the De Divinatione154
 6     Int,      IV|           we have in the disputed passage the only reference to the
 7     Int,      IV|        four books. He did so in a passage written immediately after
 8     Int,      IV|         taken place, although one passage in the Lucullus seems to
 9     Int,      IV|     shadowed forth284. In another passage the design of the Tusculan
10     Not,       1|  philosophy, see esp. a sarcastic passage about Epicurus in N.D. I.
11     Not,       1|    musicam etc. scribere. The one passage formerly quoted to justify
12     Not,       1|         is far too strong for the passage, and cannot be supported
13     Not,       1|          would be strange, in the passage which used to be compared,
14     Not,       1|         closely compared with our passage, and Varro in Aug. XIX.
15     Not,       1|           it; cf. D.F. III. 16, a passage in other respects exceedingly
16     Not,       1|           D. II. 34) In a curious passage (N.D. I. 33), Cic. charges
17     Not,       1|          III. 23, in which latter passage the Stoic opinion is severely
18     Not,       1|           providentia in the same passage, N.D. II. 58, also in N.
19     Not,       1|   increased the difficulty of the passage. He reads res ullas ...
20     Not,       1|   Heraclitus; also a very similar passage in Orator 10. Opinabilem:
21     Not,       1|          not receive from the one passage Halm quotes, De Or. III.
22     Not,       1|         Madv. in his note on that passage coins the word inaestimatio.)
23     Not,       1| expressing απαξια. Stobaeus, in a passage closely resembling ours
24     Not,       1|    quasdam virtutes: see 20. This passage requires careful construing:
25     Not,       1|         D.F. IV. 12. On this last passage Madv. has an important note,
26     Not,       1|          42, 43 (a very important passage). The actual sensation is
27     Not,       2|   evidence of the senses.~7. This passage has the same aim as the
28     Not,       2|         καταληψεις was added to a passage which would correspond in
29     Not,       2|          Adfixa therefore in this passage must have agreed with some
30     Not,       2|      quite impossible to agree. A passage in the Lucullus (60) proves
31     Not,       2|       difficult to see where this passage could have been included
32     Not,       2|         addition, however, to our passage, I note hoc loco consumitur
33     Not,       2|          on Hor. Sat. I. 6, 15. A passage like ours is D.F. I. 29,
34     Not,       2|          reipublicae detrahens, a passage often wrongly taken. Operae
35     Not,       2|   scarcely known except from this passage. Clitomachum: for this philosopher
36     Not,       2|          admodum probata: cf. the passage of Polybius qu. by Zeller
37     Not,       2|        Zeller 85, n.). In another passage (Arrian, I. 5) Epict. says
38     Not,       2|           It would seem from that passage that he defined the cognisable
39     Not,       2|     υπαρχοντος), cf. my n. on the passage. Thus defined, he most likely
40     Not,       2|         Zeller 107 sq. There is a passage in Sext. Adv. Math. VII.
41     Not,       2|            III. 15 refers to this passage, which must have been preserved
42     Not,       2|        dicere. I do not think our passage at all analogous to those
43     Not,       2|         essential throughout this passage to distinguish clearly the
44     Not,       2|        sit omnino: this difficult passage can only be properly explained
45     Not,       2|          I have met with no other passage where any such doctrine
46     Not,       2|          clause, as in the famous passage of Cic Ad Quintum Fratrem,
47     Not,       2|            and may perhaps from a passage of Augustine, C. Ac. III.
48     Not,       2|     Contra Acad. III. 31 qu. this passage wrongly as from the Hortensius.
49     Not,       2|          to change places in this passage, as Manut. proposes. The
50     Not,       2|   Arcesilas' argument. But if the passage be translated thus, "Carneades
51     Not,       2|          Sin autem, etc.: cf. the passage of Lactantius De Falsa Sapientia
52     Not,       2|       illustration of the present passage pp 293—300 with the footnotes.
53     Not,       2|        the whole confusion of the passage arises from the mania of
54     Not,       2|         not suit the sense of the passage. Negat ... torsisset: for
55     Not,       2|         failing to understand the passage, follows Christ in reading
56     Not,       2|          caelo atque: a difficult passage. MSS. have aqua, an error
57     Not,       2|           ought not to expect the passage to make sense, as it is
58     Not,       2|        fiant. The context of that passage should be carefully read,
59     Not,       2|            This way of taking the passage will defend Cic. against
60     Not,       2|          Oratorical works. In our passage, the difficulty vanishes
61     Not,       2|           whole difficulty of the passage to the absence of terms
62     Not,       2|         non probans in 148, which passage is very similar to this.
63     Not,       2|        tum lavum (the MSS. in our passage have flavum) videtur, quodque
64     Not,       2|      sustineat. Halm restored the passage. Habuerint: the subj. seems
65     Not,       2|           Madvig on D.F. V. 76, a passage which very closely resembles
66     Not,       2|             carentem: a difficult passage. Note (1) that the line
67     Not,       2|        Sext. P.H. III. 30 sq. Our passage is imitated by Aug De Civ.
68     Not,       2|        insert. Lactantius qu. the passage without perniciosa. Myrmecides:
69     Not,       2|          12, III. 1 imitates this passage. Circumfusa: cf. I. 44,
70     Not,       2|        Diog. VIII. 26 (with which passage cf. Stob. Phys. XV. 7) mentions
71     Not,       2|       Pythagorean, but in another passage (III. 24) says that Plato
72     Not,       2|          solem ... tantum: a hard passage. Egone? ne bis is the em.
73     Not,       2|         that he doubts about this passage because considero does not
74     Not,       2|       which resembles the present passage—omnibus aut maximis rebus
75     Not,       2|           I. 55, 56, a noteworthy passage. Omnis ratio etc.: this
76     Not,       2|       astray in interpreting this passage. The word is used with a
77     Not,       2|         exx. are from Forc.) This passage I believe and this alone