bold = Main text
   Liber, Caput     grey = Comment text

 1     Int,       I|          of the Greeks; but there can be little doubt that from
 2     Int,      II|         indicated as desirable, I can but describe in rough outline
 3     Int,      II|      requires us to find out what can be said for every view.
 4     Int,      II|         regard to Zeno, and there can be no doubt that he caught
 5     Int,     III|   neglected though it has been, I can treat no farther.~These
 6     Int,     III|        din of civil war122.~There can be no doubt that Cicero
 7     Int,      IV|         habit in such matters, we can have no difficulty in conjecturing
 8     Int,      IV|        that from no other schools can the orator spring, and the
 9     Int,      IV|         between Philo and Catulus can have taken place, although
10     Int,      IV|    Hortensius and Lucullus, there can be no doubt that Brutus
11     Int,      IV|  carefully out of sight. Still we can catch here and there traces
12     Int,      IV|      writing of the Academica, it can be shown that Varro, Cicero
13     Int,      IV|      philosophical views of Varro can be gathered with tolerable
14     Int,      IV|           the second edition, and can tell us nothing about the
15     Not,       1|       philosophy written in Latin can serve no useful purpose,
16     Not,       1|          verbs when an infinitive can be readily supplied to govern
17     Not,       1|      gently says, "vix Latina." I can scarcely think Halm's philosophe
18     Not,       1|           Further, vetus and nova can scarcely be so barely used
19     Not,       1|          duo is right in Cic., he can scarcely have been so inconsistent
20     Not,       1|       this is clear, that nothing can exist except in space (alicubi),
21     Not,       1|       throughout its whole extent can suffer all changes." For
22     Not,       1|           ουσια = substance which can affect the senses. The same
23     Not,       1|         is undilutedly Stoic, one can only marvel how Antiochus
24     Not,       1|         say that no real parallel can be found to this in Cic.,
25     Not,       1|          that no true information can be got from sensation, whereas,
26     Not,       1|        the subject as clear as it can be made to any one who has
27     Not,       1|      Academico-Peripatetic school can only be explained by the
28     Not,       1|         and Zeller for himself. I can only treat such points as
29     Not,       1|    sumenda, must be rejected. Nor can anything be said for Goerenz'
30     Not,       1|            135.~§40. Iunctos: how can anything be a compound of
31     Not,       1|        and combine them before we can know thoroughly any one
32     Not,       2|          knowledge show that they can make their envy reach beyond
33     Not,       2|    authority of the wise man. How can they find out the wise man
34     Not,       2|           sceptic, since argument can add nothing to the innate
35     Not,       2|           do remove them where we can (19). What power the cultivated
36     Not,       2|       prove to be false? (23) How can wisdom be wisdom if she
37     Not,       2|       some ground on which action can proceed (24). Credence must
38     Not,       2|        The fleeting and uncertain can never be discovered. Rational
39     Not,       2|        the supposition that there can be any true perception (
40     Not,       2|          a concrete individual. I can quote no parallel to this
41     Not,       2|          without the preposition) can be right in De Div. II.
42     Not,       2|           deny that any certainty can be attained through the
43     Not,       2|           unless by such marks as can appertain to no other thing.
44     Not,       2|  appertain to no other thing. How can a thing be said to be "evidently
45     Not,       2|          really black? Again, how can a thing be "evident" at
46     Not,       2|         on the other hand says he can produce 50 exx. of the usage,
47     Not,       2|       which it proceeds, then you can have no faith in any appearance
48     Not,       2|           things into those which can be perceived (known with
49     Not,       2|        things, it is enough if he can show that human faculties
50     Not,       2|          is not enough. Reasoning can only proceed upon certain
51     Not,       2|         of visa, aided by reason, can lead to knowledge (45).~§
52     Not,       2|            this difficult passage can only be properly explained
53     Not,       2|      omnia deum posse. If the god can manufacture (efficere) sensations
54     Not,       2|           he does in dreams), why can he not manufacture false
55     Not,       2|   misunderstood, I note that they can be most rationally explained
56     Not,       2|     influence of authority! (60). Can you, Cicero, the panegyrist
57     Not,       2|          much, yet I feel that it can be answered. First, however,
58     Not,       2|           only from the sensation can be false, not the sensation
59     Not,       2|           than the bent oar, what can be greater than the sun?
60     Not,       2| impressions of signet rings? (85) Can you find a ring merchant
61     Not,       2|         without art, which so few can have! What an idea this
62     Not,       2|            see M.D.F. V. 56). Nor can quin ne go together even
63     Not,       2|       knowledge fails you, if you can answer and yet refrain,
64     Not,       2|        knows exactly what his art can do and what it cannot. Very
65     Not,       2|       questioning above described can be applied to any relative
66     Not,       2|    dividing visa into those which can be perceived and those which
67     Not,       2|           of Epicurus? If nothing can be remembered which is not
68     Not,       2|     holding the opinions he does, can he profess to belong to
69     Not,       2|           universe! (120) Nothing can exist, say you, apart from
70     Not,       2|           of our bodies, which we can dissect, while we have not
71     Not,       2|     Aristo, who hold that nothing can be known about them! (123)
72     Not,       2|         you admit that all things can be perceived no more and
73     Not,       2|   conflicting theories? (134) Nor can I accept those points in
74     Not,       2|        only three ethical systems can with plausibility be defended (
75     Not,       2|           η θεος η θηριον), if he can do without other advantages.
76     Not,       2|       there is no knowledge there can be no art. How would Zeuxis