bold = Main text
   Liber, Caput     grey = Comment text

 1     Int,       I|        probably at this period of their lives that Atticus and his
 2     Int,       I|        thoroughly acquainted with their spirit, and with the main
 3     Int,       I|   judicial affairs once more took their regular course, and Cicero
 4     Int,       I|          in the habit of adapting their ancient statues to suit
 5     Int,       I|       regard to Athens still kept their hold upon his mind, and
 6     Int,       I|            letters, study, all in their turn became unpleasant64.~
 7     Int,       I|          inquire too closely into their intrinsic value. I am sorry
 8     Int,      II|       they came from the hands of their founders, but as they existed
 9     Int,      II|            The Academics glory in their freedom of judgment. They
10     Int,      II|         no, merely because one of their predecessors has laid it
11     Int,      II|        Cicero to these tenets was their evident adaptability to
12     Int,      II|           stylists had ever found their best nourishment in the
13     Int,      II|   dogmatism of Zeno and Epicurus. Their logical and physical doctrines
14     Int,      II|      Philo had been too busy with their polemic against Zeno and
15     Int,      II|          Cicero as a supporter of their "Vetus Academia," so long
16     Int,      II|         resistance. In respect of their ethical and religious ideas
17     Int,      II|        Organon were notorious for their ignorance of logic112, and
18     Int,      II|           stood absolutely alone, their system was grossly unintellectual,
19     Int,      II|       they discarded mathematics. Their ethical doctrines excited
20     Int,      II|         use, and they crowned all their errors by a sin which the
21     Int,     III|         countrymen, and to enrich their literature. He wished at
22     Int,     III|       assigns various reasons for their extreme popularity: the
23     Int,     III| reproached [xxviii] by Cicero for their uncouth style of writing116.
24     Int,     III|           them of being untrue to their country118. It would be
25     Int,     III|          Cicero, and the dates of their composition, the student
26     Int,      IV|          from whom the books took their names were extolled. In
27     Int,      IV|         very intimate with Varro: their acquaintance seems to have
28     Int,      IV|           merely inquire what was their position with respect to
29     Int,      IV|           time, and the nature of their connection with Cicero.~
30     Int,      IV|          reason is to be found in their ατριψια with respect to
31     Int,      IV|          consulares who had given their unreserved approval to the
32     Int,      IV|         which the dogmatists gave their assent to the truth of phenomena.
33     Int,      IV|     statues, the waves rippled at their feet, and the sea away to
34     Not,       1|            so the Stoics speak of their αδιαφορα as the practising
35     Not,       1|           the Gr. εδοκει, "it was their dogma," so often. Adipisci:
36     Not,       1|       alone to them was ‛αιρετον, their πρωτα κατα φυσιν were not ‛
37     Not,       1|           things into nothing and their reparation out of nothing
38     Not,       1|          edd. do. The Stoics give their World God, according to
39     Not,       1|          fleeting that no part of their being remained constant
40     Not,       1|           two processes consisted their dialectic, to which they
41     Not,       1|            VII. 83), the title of their books on the subject preserved
42     Not,       1|          loudly protested against their being called either bona
43     Not,       1|        the universe, as though to their natural home, just where
44     Not,       2|        sceptics and let them take their own way. See another view
45     Not,       2|           show that they can make their envy reach beyond the grave.
46     Not,       2|           he held things to be in their own nature καταληπτα (‛οσον
47     Not,       2|           doctrine. The Stoics by their καταληπτικη φαντασια professed
48     Not,       2|          have been urged to allow their dogma that perception is
49     Not,       2|           a certain perception of their minds. This, Carneades said,
50     Not,       2|        had not even confidence in their one dogma (29).~§19. Sensibus:
51     Not,       2|         sentiatur: αισθησις being their only κριτηριον. Madv. (without
52     Not,       2|       which a thing may be known. Their "probability" then is mere
53     Not,       2|         Halm brackets; but surely their repetition is pointed and
54     Not,       2|         supposed to rob people of their senses. Cedere: cf. εικειν,
55     Not,       2| sensations. Then they put forward their two strong arguments, (1)
56     Not,       2|         the purposes of reasoning their probabile is not enough.
57     Not,       2|           on probability, just as their "truth" was (cf. n. on 29).
58     Not,       2|     phenomena are surrounded, (2) their faith is shaken by sceptic
59     Not,       2|        would allow that things in their essence are divisible into
60     Not,       2|        with all probability even. Their talk about twins and seals
61     Not,       2|    childish (54). They press into their service the old physical
62     Not,       2| distinguished from one another by their friends, and Delian breeders
63     Not,       2|          were probably named from their inventor like Vitelliana,
64     Not,       2|        Goer. generally patronises their vulgar error.~§§72—78. Summary.
65     Not,       2|           of the Cyrenaic school; their great word was παθος. From
66     Not,       2|           your point (88, 89). In their case at least 'mind and
67     Not,       2|            what was the nature of their sensations at the time they
68     Not,       2|         allow the consequences of their own principles, according
69     Not,       2|         there is a possibility of their being false. The Stoics
70     Not,       2|        hence the Academics showed their hostility to absolute knowledge
71     Not,       2|        about the very elements of their art (143). Why then, Lucullus,
72     Not,       2|    considerably confirmed edd. in their introduction of the negative.