bold = Main text
   Liber, Caput     grey = Comment text

 1     Int,       I|         works of the former, he does not seem to have known either
 2     Int,       I| evidence I have produced, which does not include such indirect
 3     Int,      II|      has laid it down82. So far does Cicero carry this freedom,
 4     Int,     III|      the De Officiis), which he does not freely confess to be
 5     Int,     III|       elaborate apologies as he does for devoting himself to
 6     Int,     III|       by a standard to which it does not appeal, or fail to understand
 7     Int,      IV|        of the first edition, it does not contradict my supposition,
 8     Int,      IV|  dialogue which bears his name, does nothing but render literally
 9     Int,      IV|        Carneades to Rome240, he does not declare himself a follower
10     Int,      IV|        of that philosopher, nor does Crassus, in his long speech
11     Int,      IV|        failed to tell us, as he does in the case of Antonius243,
12     Int,      IV|       examined the more clearly does it appear that the main
13     Not,       1|    clause which intensifies and does not merely explain the first
14     Not,       1|       In older Greek the adverb does not appear, nor is φιλοσοφος
15     Not,       1|        in oratio recta, as Tac. does, unless there is some conditional
16     Not,       1|        which gives Philonem, as does the ed. Rom. (1471). I have
17     Not,       1|        as vocabulis above. Cic. does not observe Varro's distinction (
18     Not,       1|       not use vocabulum as Tac. does, for the name of a person (
19     Not,       1|         in his Excursus, but he does not sufficiently recognise
20     Not,       1|          I regret that my space does not allow me to pursue this
21     Not,       1|      would allow), the sentence does not represent the belief
22     Not,       1|       subject is important, but does not lie close enough to
23     Not,       1|       suspecting inter, as Halm does. Ignorationemque causarum:
24     Not,       1|         it is derivation, which does not necessitate definition.
25     Not,       1|       Manut. conj. in quo, Cic. does often use the neut. pronoun,
26     Not,       1|     support, which it certainly does not receive from the one
27     Not,       1|      beatitas and beatitudo but does not elsewhere employ them.~§
28     Not,       1|        αρετης και κακιας. (This does not contradict his words
29     Not,       2|   supported from I. 6, which he does not notice. The conj. is
30     Not,       2|        dixi for dictus. As Cic. does not often leave out est
31     Not,       2|       is right, the restriction does not hold. Admodum: "to a
32     Not,       2|        que connects clauses and does not modify hodie. On this
33     Not,       2|      point to Zenonem, but Cic. does not often name Zeno of Elea.
34     Not,       2|     image on the soul as a seal does on wax, cf. Zeller 76 and
35     Not,       2|       Clitomachus as he usually does. It would seem from that
36     Not,       2|    Philo in ancient authorities does not allow of a more exact
37     Not,       2|       in this sense as αναιρειν does in Sextus. Lux lumenque:
38     Not,       2|     phenomena, he therefore who does away with assent does away
39     Not,       2|       who does away with assent does away with all action in
40     Not,       2|       as Faber points out, Cic. does sometimes use this word
41     Not,       2|  probable (as the Stoics say he does in dreams), why can he not
42     Not,       2|       true and false sensations does not logically lead to the
43     Not,       2|       absurdum est. Eadem: this does not mean that the two sensations
44     Not,       2|         correctly, though Forc. does not recognise the word.
45     Not,       2|     that the wise man sometimes does opine" the difficulty vanishes.
46     Not,       2|         It is strange that Halm does not mention this reading,
47     Not,       2|         the word ‛αφη I believe does not occur in ancient authorities
48     Not,       2|         is needed, as importune does not suit the sense of the
49     Not,       2|    opinatus animi (IV. 465), as does Sext. A.M. VII. 210 on behalf
50     Not,       2|      contempt, while nescio qui does not, cf. Div. in qu. Caec.
51     Not,       2|        are like the mole, which does not yearn for the light
52     Not,       2|        for the light because it does not know what light is.
53     Not,       2|       sun to be a foot wide, he does not however quote Stob.
54     Not,       2|        Hermann caelatura, which does not seem to be a Ciceronian
55     Not,       2|       heap. One grain therefore does make a heap. The true sorites
56     Not,       2|      these trite sophisms as he does verses from the comic writers
57     Not,       2|         assume, as this sophism does, that when a man truly states
58     Not,       2|       Stoic sapiens confessedly does (99, 100). Our sapiens is
59     Not,       2|      word tamen altogether, nor does Bait. in adopting the suggestion
60     Not,       2|         noticed), another which does not prevent him from giving
61     Not,       2|      Sibi ipsum: note that Cic. does not generally make ipse
62     Not,       2|     neget in 111, which however does not justify the reading.
63     Not,       2|         holding the opinions he does, can he profess to belong
64     Not,       2|        the Stoic theology as he does in the sunlight. If he holds
65     Not,       2|        Strato, however, says he does not need the deity to construct
66     Not,       2|       passage because considero does not belong to the class
67     Not,       2|  deleatur, which Halm takes, as does Baiter. Mine is rather nearer
68     Not,       2|      etiam with the comparative does not occur till the silver
69     Not,       2|       and Plato disagree (142). Does Antiochus follow any of