bold = Main text
   Liber, Caput     grey = Comment text

 1     Int,      II|         suffice to distinguish the true from the false, and the
 2     Int,      II|          are often depicted79. The true philosophic spirit requires
 3     Int,      II|         The probable is for it the true.~Another consideration which
 4     Int,      II|            reared. This is equally true of the Pyrrhonian scepticism
 5     Int,      II|            they should be the only true philosophers [xxii] after
 6     Int,      II|        former Zeno's dialectic was true and Socratic, while the
 7     Int,      II|          it a worthy branch of the true Socratic family. With the
 8     Int,     III|           his works. The charge is true, but still absurd, for it
 9     Int,     III|             Looked at in this, the true light, his work cannot be
10     Int,      IV|       disclose in a letter182. The true reasons, however, did appear
11     Int,      IV|      second edition276. If this be true, Brutus would not speak
12     Not,       1|    difficulty of setting forth the true system of physics. If quoniam
13     Not,       1|           the permanently real and true (30). The senses they thought
14     Not,       1|           Antiochus assert that no true information can be got from
15     Not,       1|            divided sensations into true and false. I believe that
16     Not,       1|          visa) he divided into the true and the untrue; if the examination
17     Not,       1|           in the text is not quite true for Diog. V. 58, 59 preserves
18     Not,       1|                tuebantur: far from true as it stands, Polemo was
19     Not,       1|        Zeno et Arcesilas: scarcely true, for Polemo was merely one
20     Not,       1|             This is, however, only true of the healthy reason, the
21     Not,       2|     Implorans: "appealing to," the true meaning being "to appeal
22     Not,       2|            are here treated as the true Academics, though Antiochus
23     Not,       2|            the innate clearness of true sensations (17). Most however
24     Not,       2|    unimpaired, they give perfectly true information about external
25     Not,       2|     rendered impossible (22). That true perception is possible,
26     Not,       2|  supposition that there can be any true perception (28). Antiochus
27     Not,       2|     doctrine of the Academics were true, a man might really be in
28     Not,       2|           them "the undestructibly true and false." This being so,
29     Not,       2|     profess to distinguish between true and false, and on the other
30     Not,       2|         for distinguishing between true and false is possible (33).
31     Not,       2|         distinguishing between the true and the false while you
32     Not,       2|            away with the notion of true and false altogether." The
33     Not,       2|           is fair to use the term "true" to denote the probably
34     Not,       2|             to denote the probably true, the Academics are not open
35     Not,       2|           Sextus; "in whose vision true and false are confused."
36     Not,       2|            inquiry, seems probably true (Sext. A.M. VII. 167—175).
37     Not,       2|          is indeed what they call 'true'." Impressum: n. on 18.
38     Not,       2|     proceed. Sensations are partly true, partly false, the false
39     Not,       2|        real perceptions, while the true are always of a form which
40     Not,       2|           1) sensations are partly true, partly false, (2) every
41     Not,       2|           is to say that there are true ones; you acknowledge therefore
42     Not,       2|            in themselves, might be true or false, but affirmed that
43     Not,       2|    probable as to closely resemble true ones, or to be only with
44     Not,       2|           distinguishable from the true, or finally to be utterly
45     Not,       2|         indistinguishable from the true (this meaning of inter quae
46     Not,       2|       degree of resemblance to the true, by the three succeeding
47     Not,       2|           distinguishable from the true? The rest exactly as in
48     Not,       2|       amount of similarity between true and false sensations does
49     Not,       2|         distinguishing between the true and the false (50). We contend
50     Not,       2|     attempt to distinguish between true and false visa. Lucullus
51     Not,       2|          follow. The doctrine that true and false sensations are
52     Not,       2|    possible to distinguish between true and false (67). Even if
53     Not,       2|             this of course is only true if you grant the Academic
54     Not,       2|        proposition is not strictly true, see n. on 132. Sensisse: =
55     Not,       2|           ingeniously supposed the true reading to be novas, which
56     Not,       2|           disputed viz. that every true sensation has side by side
57     Not,       2|     overthrown, yet his senses are true quotha!" (For this use of
58     Not,       2|           cf. Zeller 510, 511. The true ground of attack is that
59     Not,       2|    therefore does make a heap. The true sorites or chain inference
60     Not,       2|           moment when he makes the true statement. The root of the
61     Not,       2|            many things seem to him true; yet he always feels that
62     Not,       2|            which is not absolutely true, then these will be true (
63     Not,       2|           true, then these will be true (106). Probability is quite
64     Not,       2|         first admit that there are true and false visa and then
65     Not,       2|          is any difference between true and false, is absurd. We
66     Not,       2| distinguish accurately between the true and the existent, the false
67     Not,       2|        Cernimus: i.e. the probably true and false. Probandi species:
68     Not,       2|          that the sapiens, however true he admits the bases of proof