IntraText Table of Contents | Words: Alphabetical - Frequency - Inverse - Length - Statistics | Help | IntraText Library |
Alphabetical [« »] irrisione 1 irrumpere 1 irruperit 1 is 1054 iscys 1 isdem 9 isocrates 2 | Frequency [« »] 2051 in 1618 to 1264 and 1054 is 1016 a 783 i 747 et | Marcus Tullius Cicero Academica Concordances is |
bold = Main text Liber, Caput grey = Comment text
1001 Not, 2 | MSS.~§130. Aristonem: this is Aristo of Chios, not Aristo 1002 Not, 2 | αξιαι in 36, where momenti is used in a different way. 1003 Not, 2 | conj., but in 124 there is just the same change from 1004 Not, 2 | Callipho: as the genitive is Calliphontis, Cic. ought 1005 Not, 2 | 14 the finis of Polemo is stated to be secundum naturam 1006 Not, 2 | adopted, and from him it is attributed to the vetus 1007 Not, 2 | Scala. Carneades: this finis is given in D.F. II. 35 (frui 1008 Not, 2 | 42 (Carneadeum illud quod is non tam ut probaret protulit, 1009 Not, 2 | therefore, thus stated, is not different from that 1010 Not, 2 | from that of Polemo, but it is clear that Carneades intended 1011 Not, 2 | similar line of argument is taken in Sext. P.H. I. 88, 1012 Not, 2 | Terminis ... possessione: there is a similar play on the legal 1013 Not, 2 | Omnis ratio etc.: this is the constant language of 1014 Not, 2 | intelligentes. N, I may remark, is frequently inserted in MSS. ( 1015 Not, 2 | question uter est prudentior is intended to press home the 1016 Not, 2 | removal of passion and delight is easier than that of fear 1017 Not, 2 | D.F. p. 806, ed. 2, who is severe upon the reading 1018 Not, 2 | takes, as does Baiter. Mine is rather nearer the MSS. Decreta: 1019 Not, 2 | Aureolus ... libellus: it is not often that two diminutives 1020 Not, 2 | together in Cic., and the usage is rather colloquial; cf. T. 1021 Not, 2 | III. 3, where the saying is attributed to Aristotle ( 1022 Not, 2 | origin of the Stoic paradoxes is affirmed in Parad. 4, T. 1023 Not, 2 | Carneade: the vocative is Carneades in De Div. I. 1024 Not, 2 | Aristotle. The meaning of pecus is well shown in T.D. I. 69. 1025 Not, 2 | solum: the same criticism is applied to Zeno's finis 1026 Not, 2 | Carneades ... defensitabat: this is quite a different view from 1027 Not, 2 | yet another of Carneades is given in T.D. V. 83. Istum 1028 Not, 2 | Tu ... copulabis: this is the feigned expostulation 1029 Not, 2 | honestate: this whole expression is in apposition to par, so 1030 Not, 2 | sapiens (145). Now as there is no knowledge there can be 1031 Not, 2 | dealt with in 91—98 here it is merely considered with a 1032 Not, 2 | maiorum cf. 80. Here Plato is almost excluded from the 1033 Not, 2 | see Quint. X. 1, 12. This is probably the meaning here; " 1034 Not, 2 | between Diodorus and Philo is mentioned in Sext. A.M. 1035 Not, 2 | cannot think that the word is wrong, though all edd. condemn 1036 Not, 2 | all edd. condemn it. Halm is certainly mistaken in saying 1037 Not, 2 | epithet such as ingeniosissimi is necessary. I believe that 1038 Not, 2 | Hermann's spinosissimi is ingenious, and if an em. 1039 Not, 2 | in the mind of a φαυλος is mere δοξα and not επιστημη; 1040 Not, 2 | also P.H. II. 83, where it is said that the φαυλος is 1041 Not, 2 | is said that the φαυλος is capable of το αληθες but 1042 Not, 2 | fuerat: καταλαμβανειν however is frequent in Plato in the 1043 Not, 2 | Dav. conj. improbans and is followed by Bait. I am not 1044 Not, 2 | sure that the MSS. reading is wrong. The difficulty is 1045 Not, 2 | is wrong. The difficulty is essentially the same as 1046 Not, 2 | closely compared. A contrast is drawn between a theoretical 1047 Not, 2 | practical belief. The dogma is that assent (meaning absolute 1048 Not, 2 | meaning absolute assent) is not to be given to phenomena. 1049 Not, 2 | comprobans). The practice is to give assent (meaning 1050 Not, 2 | modified assent). There is the same contrast in 104 1051 Not, 2 | interpreting this passage. The word is used with a double reference 1052 Not, 2 | Civ. I. 31, where tollere is used of weighing anchor, 1053 Not, 2 | I believe and this alone is referred to in Ad Att. XIII. 1054 Not, 2 | 21, 3. If my conjecture is correct, Cic. tried at first