bold = Main text
   Liber, Caput     grey = Comment text

 1     Int,      IV|       summary classification of the sensations, with the reasons for refusing
 2     Not,       1|         Lucullus, he really divided sensations into true and false. I believe
 3     Not,       1|             was entirely free (40). Sensations (visa) he divided into the
 4     Not,       1|           defended the truth of all sensations, Zeno abandoned the weak
 5     Not,       1|           rerum: only this class of sensations gives correct information
 6     Not,       1|         must generalize on separate sensations and combine them before
 7     Not,       2|            innate clearness of true sensations (17). Most however do allow
 8     Not,       2|            always other synchronous sensations which are able to turn him
 9     Not,       2|           shown all the concomitant sensations to be in harmony with it. (
10     Not,       2|        agreement of the concomitant sensations with the principal one.
11     Not,       2| Circumstances quite external to the sensations themselves must be examined;
12     Not,       2|            the different classes of sensations. Then they put forward their
13     Not,       2|             1) things which produce sensations such as might have been
14     Not,       2|             partly not capable, (2) sensations must be assumed to be of
15     Not,       2|            them. Then they proceed. Sensations are partly true, partly
16     Not,       2|           the false may assume. Now sensations which are indistinguishable
17     Not,       2|         universally made, (1) false sensations cannot be perceptions, (
18     Not,       2|          cannot be perceptions, (2) sensations which are indistinguishable
19     Not,       2|           they strive to prove, (1) sensations are partly true, partly
20     Not,       2|    perceptions into those which are sensations, and those which are deduced
21     Not,       2|        those which are deduced from sensations; after which they show that
22     Not,       2|           are supposed to cause two sensations so similar that the person
23     Not,       2|           person who has one of the sensations cannot tell from which of
24     Not,       2|      absolute similarity of the two sensations which come from the two
25     Not,       2|            of things, though not of sensations. If we could only pierce
26     Not,       2|     existence of things which cause sensations, they simply maintained
27     Not,       2|        existence of the things, our sensations do not give us correct information
28     Not,       2|            say that there are false sensations is to say that there are
29     Not,       2|             allow that mere phantom sensations are often seen in dreams,
30     Not,       2|            what is easier, that two sensations caused by two really existing
31     Not,       2|             admit that mere phantom sensations do command assent. Why should
32     Not,       2|          can manufacture (efficere) sensations which are false, but probable (
33     Not,       2|            he not manufacture false sensations which are so probable as
34     Not,       2|     Probabilia, then, denotes false sensations such as have only a slight
35     Not,       2|            viz to show that phantom sensations may produce the same effect
36     Not,       2|            etc.: if there are false sensations which are probable (as the
37     Not,       2|           should there not be false sensations so probable as to be with
38     Not,       2|   similarity between true and false sensations does not logically lead
39     Not,       2|          contend that these phantom sensations lack that self evidence
40     Not,       2|         dream, we make light of the sensations we had while in it (51).
41     Not,       2|        while they last our dreaming sensations are as vivid as our waking
42     Not,       2|          does not mean that the two sensations are merged into one, but
43     Not,       2|             but would deny that the sensations which proceed from or are
44     Not,       2|      distinction between individual sensations, but not between classes
45     Not,       2|          but not between classes of sensations (58). Equally absurd are
46     Not,       2|           probable and undisturbed" sensations they profess to follow.
47     Not,       2|        doctrine that true and false sensations are indistinguishable logically
48     Not,       2|          concerned to show that two sensations are absolutely similar,
49     Not,       2|              87). You said that the sensations of dreamers, drunkards and
50     Not,       2|             was the nature of their sensations at the time they were affected? (
51     Not,       2|        Ennius did not assent to his sensations at all, conj. vigilantis.
52     Not,       2|              II. 38, etc.) analysed sensations into two parts; with the