bold = Main text
   Liber, Caput     grey = Comment text

 1     Int,       I|           in study.1 From him was probably derived that strong love
 2     Int,       I|      teaching of Phaedrus. It was probably at this period of their
 3     Int,       I|           two pupils20. Patro was probably in Athens at the same time,
 4     Int,       I|         accompanied him, and they probably touched there for a few
 5     Int,       I| Hortensius and the De Finibus had probably both been planned and commenced. [
 6     Int,     III|          his estimate of them was probably correct. A curious question
 7     Int,      IV|      whose importunities he would probably again have changed his plans.
 8     Int,      IV|         will he read them?" Varro probably received the books in the
 9     Int,      IV|         of the elder Catulus were probably extolled, as well as those
10     Int,      IV|        famous books of Philo were probably not known to Catulus248.~
11     Int,      IV|       Catulus the younger. It was probably introduced by a mention
12     Int,      IV|        represent the Greek265. He probably also commented on the headlong
13     Int,      IV|         its main intention269. He probably gave a summary classification
14     Int,      IV|             to this was appended, probably, that foretaste of the negative
15     Not,       1|           Halm) or monementis, is probably the right spelling; cf.
16     Not,       1|            III. 14) and the usage probably is not Latin. Adducere?:
17     Not,       1|          unknown commentators who probably only exist in Goerenz's
18     Not,       1|          Off. III. 20). Antiochus probably made light of such dialectical
19     Not,       1|       1007) give duos, which Cic. probably wrote. Duo is in old Latin
20     Not,       1|         exc G, insert disserendi, probably from the line above, Lipsius
21     Not,       1|        Adv. Math. VII. 16. It was probably first brought into strong
22     Not,       1|        Greek, as frequently, here probably of εθισμος (Nic. Eth. II.
23     Not,       1|       Platonic. Antiochus however probably apprehended the distinction
24     Not,       1|   censebant ... tale quale esset: probably from Plato's Tim. 35 A thus
25     Not,       1|  knowledge of Plato has, however, probably led him to intensify what
26     Not,       1|       sunt, etc.: Antiochus would probably defend his agreement with
27     Not,       1|          R. and P. 21. The Stoics probably misunderstood him; cf. R.
28     Not,       1|          verbum quidem hoc quidem probably ought to be read, see 18.
29     Not,       2|         already mentioned 43, and probably repeated in this fragment.
30     Not,       2|       Introd. p. 55. The argument probably ran thus: What seems so
31     Not,       2|     connection with the dialogue. Probably Zeno is the person who serius
32     Not,       2|          s square, the word being probably a corruption of the Greek
33     Not,       2|           senses. To these should probably be added fragm. 32. Fr.
34     Not,       2|          passive verb, Nonius has probably quoted wrongly. It will
35     Not,       2|           part this fragment must probably be referred.~34. This important
36     Not,       2|     speech of the day before, had probably added other examples, cf.
37     Not,       2|    occurrit ... aget: occurrit is probably the perfect. Cf. n. on 127.~§
38     Not,       2|    agrestis aliquos. Moveri: this probably refers to the speech of
39     Not,       2|         term "true" to denote the probably true, the Academics are
40     Not,       2|        any further inquiry, seems probably true (Sext. A.M. VII. 167—
41     Not,       2|        Quasi fundamenta: a trans. probably of θεμελιος or the like;
42     Not,       2|           reply to the question, "probably it cannot, but I will not
43     Not,       2|          in D.F. II. 33 ut should probably be written (with Manut.
44     Not,       2|           Dinotatas: so the MSS., probably correctly, though Forc.
45     Not,       2|           lay close to Bauli, and probably induced this mention of
46     Not,       2|          to Festus s.v. They were probably named from their inventor
47     Not,       2|        Cic. in the second edition probably introduced here the translation
48     Not,       2|         noticeable use. Physicis: probably neut. Contra sensus: he
49     Not,       2|        denied. Cernimus: i.e. the probably true and false. Probandi
50     Not,       2|           velut illud ante, which probably arose from a marginal variant "
51     Not,       2|          Quint. X. 1, 12. This is probably the meaning here; "do we
52     Not,       2|     concitare? Expromam: Cic. was probably thinking of the use to which