bold = Main text
   Liber, Caput     grey = Comment text

 1     Int,       I|         even when mentioning his speech in defence of Roscius, never
 2     Int,       I|          biting and sarcastic in speech, and spiteful in spirit,
 3     Int,      IV|   nothing but render literally a speech of Antiochus, which he professes
 4     Int,      IV|         construct in outline the speech of Catulus from indications
 5     Int,      IV|        does Crassus, in his long speech about Greek philosophy,
 6     Int,      IV|        the chief features of the speech of Catulus the younger.
 7     Int,      IV|      considerable portion of the speech must have been directed
 8     Int,      IV|       most important part of the speech, however, must have consisted
 9     Int,      IV|         those parts of Lucullus' speech which deal with the constructive
10     Int,      IV|       between the prooemium, the speech of Catulus, and the succeeding
11     Int,      IV| philosophy, corresponding to the speech of Varro in the beginning
12     Int,      IV| Hortensius, the substance of the speech could have been assigned
13     Int,      IV|        liii] who was answering a speech already made. On the view
14     Int,      IV|       Cicero's materials for the speech of Hortensius were, doubtless,
15     Int,      IV|       teaching of Antiochus.~The speech of Hortensius was answered
16     Int,      IV|         my view of the preceding speech is correct, [liv] it follows
17     Int,      IV|   purpose [lv] of Cicero in this speech was to justify from the
18     Int,      IV|        to Lucullus. In his later speech, he expressly tells us that
19     Int,      IV|   considerable space in Cicero's speech, although foreign to its
20     Int,      IV|       and tenor of the elaborate speech of Cicero in the Lucullus
21     Int,      IV|       chief sources for Cicero's speech in the Catulus were, doubtless,
22     Int,      IV|         resumed by Lucullus. His speech is especially acknowledged
23     Int,      IV|      heard Antiochus engage. The speech of Lucullus was, as I have
24     Int,      IV|       form of the Academica, the speech of Lucullus was no doubt
25     Int,      IV|         Hortensius. Book III.: a speech of Varro in reply to Cicero,
26     Not,       1|     Orationis ratione conclusae: speech drawn up in a syllogistic
27     Not,       1|    Aristoteles, supposes Varro's speech to begin here. To the objection
28     Not,       2|        in substance to Lucullus' speech in the Academica Priora
29     Not,       2|    parallels to this in Cicero's speech than in that of Lucullus
30     Not,       2|        the substance of Catulus' speech which unfolded the doctrine
31     Not,       2|       incorporated with Cicero's speech in the second book of this
32     Not,       2|       this to the end of Varro's speech in the third Book. With
33     Not,       2|      have occurred either in the speech of Catulus or in that of
34     Not,       2|         244, 414. Cicero, in his speech of the day before, had probably
35     Not,       2|      this probably refers to the speech of Catulus; see Introd.
36     Not,       2|          not be surprised if the speech of Lucullus were to induce
37     Not,       2|         56. Nota: cf. 58 and the speech of Lucullus passim. Ne sit ...
38     Not,       2|       this section cf. Lucullus' speech, passim, and Sext. P.H.
39     Not,       2|      time and to this particular speech of Ant. Ut hoc ipsum: the