bold = Main text
   Liber, Caput     grey = Comment text

 1     Pre         |         philosophical works with quite the purpose which I have
 2     Int,       I|        politics and oratory held quite a secondary place in his
 3     Int,      II|     Cicero's ethics, then, stand quite apart from his dialectic.
 4     Int,     III|          from the charge is also quite unwarranted. If the later
 5     Int,      IV| divisions of a work. I should be quite content, then, to refer
 6     Int,      IV|        letters of Cicero. We are quite certain that the book was
 7     Int,      IV|      Atticus in the dialogue was quite an [xxxix] inferior one,
 8     Not,       1|         pronouns (illum, eum) is quite Ciceronian. The emphatic
 9     Not,       1|         longo by the word eum is quite in Cicero's style (see my
10     Not,       1|      Atque ea: Halm brackets ea, quite needlessly, for its insertion
11     Not,       1|     after accipient. The text is quite right, ne quidem, as Halm
12     Not,       1|         clauses. Cic. however is quite as fond of variety as of
13     Not,       1|    ultimate bases of the two are quite different. In rejecting
14     Not,       1|     susceptio however, above, is quite enough for both clauses;
15     Not,       1|        entity, which doctrine is quite Aristotelian. See the reff.
16     Not,       1|     Verborum explicatio: this is quite a different thing from those
17     Not,       1|       nominum in N.D. III. 62 is quite different). One more remark,
18     Not,       1|          as in Orator 3, but not quite thus. I have sometimes thought
19     Not,       1|       would not eulogise himself quite so unblushingly, Goer. feebly
20     Not,       1|     statement in the text is not quite true for Diog. V. 58, 59
21     Not,       1|          minoris aestimanda bear quite as strong a negative meaning
22     Not,       1|          D.F. III. 52). There is quite as good ground for accusing
23     Not,       2|      With this opinion I find it quite impossible to agree. A passage
24     Not,       2|          the part, labefactus is quite wrong. The former is indeed
25     Not,       2|         of knowledge on a ground quite different from the καταληπτικη
26     Not,       2|      necessarily good fortune is quite unfounded; see Tischer on
27     Not,       2|   concerns the virtues. Goer. is quite wrong in taking it to be
28     Not,       2|     principal one. Circumstances quite external to the sensations
29     Not,       2|       before the guttural. It is quite impossible that Cic. could
30     Not,       2|       harum; the text however is quite right, cf. Madv. Gram. 214
31     Not,       2|   introduced by Goer. and Orelli quite destroys the point of the
32     Not,       2|       innumerabilis: this is the quite untenable reading of the
33     Not,       2|       non. The sense is, "we are quite content not to be able to
34     Not,       2|          Gram. 479 a. I think it quite possible that recte consensit
35     Not,       2|         81. Nescio qui: Goer. is quite wrong in saying that nescio
36     Not,       2|       true (106). Probability is quite sufficient basis for the
37     Not,       2|      This explanation though not quite satisfactory is the best
38     Not,       2|            defensitabat: this is quite a different view from that