bold = Main text
   Liber, Caput     grey = Comment text

 1     Pre         |          Latin usage, if it were new to him, and might solve
 2     Int,      II|       Peripatetic, Epicurean and new Academic. These it would
 3     Int,      II|         Lyceum by Cratippus; the new Academicism of Philo as
 4     Int,      II|   substantial agreement with the New Academic school, and in
 5     Int,      II|     which was most distinctively New Academic, Cicero followed
 6     Int,      II|    Academic, Cicero followed the New Academy.~It is easy to see
 7     Int,      II|          the Old Academy for the New, and admits the charge.
 8     Int,      II|      from the Old Academy to the New. This view is confirmed
 9     Int,      II|      moral question, he begs the New Academy, which has introduced
10     Int,     III|       never pretended to present new views of philosophy, or
11     Int,      IV|        he had determined on some new work to which our Academica
12     Int,      IV|           We have a mention that new prooemia had been added
13     Int,      IV|         forward to show that the New Academic revolt against
14     Int,      IV|  Posteriora262. He justified the New Academy by showing that
15     Int,      IV|   philosophy the position of the New Academy, and not to advance
16     Int,      IV|          s name to those general New Academic doctrines which
17     Not,       1|          the Old Academy for the New. Cic. defends himself, and
18     Not,       1|       for the statement that the New Academy is in harmony with
19     Not,       1|        to denote the Old and the New Academy. The reading illam
20     Not,       1|          tum. His proofs of this new Latin may be sampled by
21     Not,       1|        to the incertitude of the New Academy. Descriptio: so
22     Not,       1|         is covertly aimed at the New Academics, whose scepticism,
23     Not,       1|  historical justification of the New Academy. Summary. Arcesilas'
24     Not,       2|  historical justification of the New Academy with which I suppose
25     Not,       2|        the following effect. The New Academy must not be regarded
26     Not,       2|          did was to discuss that new doctrine of καταληψις advanced
27     Not,       2|    enriched than attacked by the New. Antiochus, in adopting
28     Not,       2|        strife between it and the New. With Antiochus the historical
29     Not,       2|          Contra. Ac. II. 1) that New Academicism was excusable
30     Not,       2|          wrote the Academica the New Academic dialectic had been
31     Not,       2|         abound in Cic. where the New Academy is mentioned, cf.
32     Not,       2|         words, there was nothing new to him about such a doctrine.
33     Not,       2|      himself the defender of the new Philonian dialectic. By
34     Not,       2|        25). The doctrines of the New Academy would put an end
35     Not,       2|       that he often introduces a new argument by ερωταται και
36     Not,       2|       mysteriis custodita by the New Academics. The notion that
37     Not,       2| Academicism were weaker than his new arguments against it. Quis