bold = Main text
   Liber, Caput     grey = Comment text

 1     Int,      IV|          edition of the polemical argument of Hortensius257, which
 2     Int,      IV|          the day before. Cicero's argument in the Catulus was allowed
 3     Int,      IV|           believes [lvi] that the argument of Catulus was answered
 4     Not,       1|        edd. here give sedium. The argument for sedem is the awkwardness
 5     Not,       1|        enim valentius: this is an argument often urged, as in N.D.
 6     Not,       1|       mere passion for victory in argument, but to the obscurity of
 7     Not,       2|            see Introd. p. 55. The argument probably ran thus: What
 8     Not,       2|         the senses are. A similar argument occurs in Luc. 86. Perpendiculum
 9     Not,       2|        extracts formed part of an argument intended to show the deceptive
10     Not,       2|          other hand, Cic. drew an argument hostile to the senses from
11     Not,       2|     doubtless used by Varro as an argument in favour of assuming absolute
12     Not,       2|         Rerum leviorum: a similar argument in D.F. I. 12. Quodam in
13     Not,       2|          dogmatists think that no argument ought to be held with a
14     Not,       2|        held with a sceptic, since argument can add nothing to the innate
15     Not,       2|           us suppose, for sake of argument, that the doctrines of the
16     Not,       2|      cannot recognise a defeat in argument and refuses to see the force
17     Not,       2|  fatebuntur: essentially the same argument as in 33 at the end. Occurretur:
18     Not,       2|         he often introduces a new argument by ερωταται και τουτο, when
19     Not,       2|           interrogatory about the argument at all. Dissolvere: απολυεσθαι
20     Not,       2|    criticism in 50 shows that the argument is meant to be based on
21     Not,       2|         D.F. III. 58 for sit. The argument has the same purpose as
22     Not,       2|           II. 86. For the line of argument here cf. De Div. II. 106
23     Not,       2|    condemned in n. on 34. For the argument see n. on 80 quasi vero
24     Not,       2|          The strength of Lucullus argument has affected me much, yet
25     Not,       2|      assent (66). Hear Arcesilas' argument: if the sapiens ever gives
26     Not,       2|           peril. Still, our whole argument must tend to show that perception
27     Not,       2|      second premiss of Arcesilas' argument. But if the passage be translated
28     Not,       2|          difficulty vanishes. The argument of Carneades would then
29     Not,       2| pertinebat: by illud is meant the argument in defence of εποχη given
30     Not,       2|          the use of the hackneyed argument of Antiochus (109). Where
31     Not,       2|     knowledge he wants (110). The argument of Antiochus that the Academics
32     Not,       2|      Antiochum: a similar line of argument is taken in Sext. P.H. I.
Best viewed with any browser at 800x600 or 768x1024 on Tablet PC
IntraText® (VA1) - Some rights reserved by EuloTech SRL - 1996-2009. Content in this page is licensed under a Creative Commons License