bold = Main text
   Liber, Caput     grey = Comment text

 1     Pre         |      place before the reader the arguments for and against different
 2     Int,      II|        he was accustomed to hear arguments put forward with equal persuasiveness
 3     Int,      II|      Roman. Cicero further urges arguments similar to some put forward
 4     Int,     III|          by the most far-fetched arguments to show that philosophy
 5     Int,      IV|         on the negative Academic arguments, while he developed fully
 6     Int,      IV|       Carneades. All the counter arguments of Lucullus which concern
 7     Int,      IV|         not to advance sceptical arguments against experience, which
 8     Int,      IV|         speak next268. Yet these arguments must have occupied some
 9     Int,      IV|          another person. All his arguments are explicitly stated to
10     Int,      IV|        foretaste of the negative arguments against dogmatism, which
11     Not,       1|        and maintained that since arguments of equal strength could
12     Not,       2|     those anticipatory sceptical arguments which Cic. in the first
13     Not,       2|       known and grasped. Similar arguments are very frequent in Sextus,
14     Not,       2|         the text are in no sense arguments, they are mere assertions,
15     Not,       2|         forward their two strong arguments, (1) things which produce
16     Not,       2|         Antiochus attacked these arguments as soritae, and therefore
17     Not,       2|     making Cic. say that the old arguments of Antiochus in favour of
18     Not,       2|         were weaker than his new arguments against it. Quis enim: so
19     Not,       2| scepticism. They advanced indeed arguments against sense-knowledge,
20     Not,       2|        your cause in spite of my arguments yesterday against the senses.
21     Not,       2|       advance against the senses arguments drawn from Chrysippus himself (
22     Not,       2|         Lucullus. Trans. "all my arguments remain untouched; your case
23     Not,       2|          sunt interpreted "these arguments I am going to urge are grand,
24     Not,       2|         Carneades in reading the arguments of Chrysippus against the
25     Not,       2|    Mentiens, (95). You assent to arguments which are identical in form
26     Not,       2|  Antiochus, the Mentiens and the arguments identical with it in form
27     Not,       2|          it cannot. Very similar arguments to this of Cic. occur in
28     Not,       2|        Zeller (114, note). These arguments are called μονολημματοι (
29     Not,       2|         probable and improbable. Arguments aimed at the senses concern