bold = Main text
   Liber, Caput          grey = Comment text

 1     Pre              | untrustworthiness of Goerenz's learning Madvig's pages bear strong evidence;
 2     Pre              |                 notes; the chief are to Madvig's little book entitled Emendationes
 3     Pre              |                 to the best teaching of Madvig, on whose foundation every
 4     Pre              |              existence. Yet, even after Madvig's labours, a great deal
 5     Pre              |               quoted. These books, with Madvig's De Finibus, all teachers
 6    Abbr              |           Democr. = Democritus.~Madv. = Madvig; M.D.F. = Madvig's edition
 7    Abbr              |                Madv. = Madvig; M.D.F. = Madvig's edition of the De Finibus;
 8     Int,      II     |               his day. The criticism of Madvig even is not free from this
 9     Int,      IV     |                Many scholars, including Madvig, have understood that the
10     Int,      IV     |              denote a portion of a work Madvig suspects155, thus obtains
11     Int,      IV     |              the old view maintained by Madvig.~[xxxvi] ~Whatever be the
12     Int,      IV(303)|                                     See Madvig, De Fin. ed. 2, p. 824;
13     Not,       1     |              etiam begins the apodosis. Madvig (Emendationes ad Ciceronis
14     Not,       1     |              ellipse of bona in 19, 22. Madvig's Philonia is improbable
15     Not,       1     |                 upon it two years after Madvig's crushing exposure in his
16     Not,       1     |                 D.F. IV. 35, V. 38, and Madvig's note on D.F. II. 88. Faber
17     Not,       1     |                 κατα φυσιν in Latin see Madvig's Fourth Excursus to the
18     Not,       1     |             this is historically absurd Madvig shows in his Excursus, but
19     Not,       1     |         tradebatur: so Halm improves on Madvig's ita for in qua of the
20     Not,       1     |           pronomen illud reperiri" with Madvig's utter refutation in the
21     Not,       1     |                 the ληπτα. This view of Madvig's is strongly opposed to
22     Not,       2     |             where one MS. has qua. Read Madvig's lucid note there. De quibus
23     Not,       2     |                 other good critic since Madvig's remarks in Em. 125 has
24     Not,       2     |              Quis est quin cernat: read Madvig's strong remarks on Goerenz'
25     Not,       2     |              the very severe remarks of Madvig on D.F. V. 76, a passage
26     Not,       2     |                  More on the subject in Madvig's fourth Excursus to the