bold = Main text
   Liber, Caput     grey = Comment text

 1     Int,      II|      discuss all aspects of every question, after the example of the
 2     Int,      II|         dialogue turns on a moral question, he begs the New Academy,
 3     Int,      II|      teacher Antiochus. One great question which divided the philosophers
 4     Int,     III|       probably correct. A curious question arises, which I cannot here
 5     Int,      IV|     details, and in the letter in question he asks for just the kind
 6     Int,      IV|           The meaning of the last question is made clear by a passage
 7     Int,      IV|         view of the συνταγματα in question is that they are simply
 8     Int,      IV|           are the compositions in question. If this conjecture is correct,
 9     Int,      IV|           is made to him when any question is started which touches
10     Int,      IV|  examination in the Lucullus.~One question remains: how far did Cicero
11     Not,       1|               requirere: i.e. the question which follows; cf. requiris
12     Not,       1|         opinion on this difficult question the student should read
13     Not,       1|        Nec tamen beatissimam: the question whether αρετη was αυταρκες
14     Not,       1|     either bona or mala, and this question was one of the great battle
15     Not,       2|          Elea. Saturninus: of the question why he was an enemy of Lucullus,
16     Not,       2| Rationibus progredi: to a similar question Sextus answers, ουκ εστιν
17     Not,       2|         would say in reply to the question, "probably it cannot, but
18     Not,       2|         Lucullus here ignores the question at issue, which concerned
19     Not,       2|         course involves the whole question at issue between dogmatism
20     Not,       2|       stand still (82). The whole question lies in a nutshell; of four
21     Not,       2|       moments of such people; the question is, what was the nature
22     Not,       2|          oculis: an answer to the question nihil cernis? in 102. Purpureum:
23     Not,       2|           not quis, in the second question, as in Verr. IV. 5. The
24     Not,       2|        for si numquam of MSS. The question uter est prudentior is intended