bold = Main text
   Liber, Caput     grey = Comment text

 1     Not,       1|     philosophy, by asking Varro why he leaves this subject untouched (
 2     Not,       1|       orators. He gives reasons why he should himself make the
 3     Not,       1|  dubitantem, Baiter dubitanter, Why alter? Ars quaedam philosophiae:
 4     Not,       1|        is more difficult to see why it should be introduced
 5     Not,       1|      with Manut. writes inquam. Why change? Atticus answers
 6     Not,       1|          Soli: Halm, I know not why, suspects this and Christ
 7     Not,       2|         limits of a single day. Why interrupt the discussion
 8     Not,       2|     Saturninus: of the question why he was an enemy of Lucullus,
 9     Not,       2|       are often seen in dreams, why then do you not allow what
10     Not,       2|   sensations do command assent. Why should they not admit that
11     Not,       2|         say he does in dreams), why can he not manufacture false
12     Not,       2| probable (as the Stoics allow), why should there not be false
13     Not,       2|      not be classed with these. Why? Socrates said he knew nothing
14     Not,       2|          3 inquiring the reason why drunkards see double he
15     Not,       2|       For my part, I do not see why the poet should not regard
16     Not,       2|      yet refuse to assent to it Why so? (96) You demand that
17     Not,       2|         Necessarium: the reason why Epicurus refused to admit
18     Not,       2|      possible on my principles. Why, did not Siron remember
19     Not,       2|   refuse assent to the sorites, why then should not the Academic
20     Not,       2|        about physical subjects, why will they not allow me to
21     Not,       2|  Antiochus follow any of these? Why, he never even follows the
22     Not,       2|    elements of their art (143). Why then, Lucullus, do you rouse