bold = Main text
   Liber, Caput     grey = Comment text

 1     Pre         |     s Stoics, Epicureans and Sceptics (whenever Zeller is quoted
 2     Not,       1|       14. None of these were sceptics; for Democritus see my note
 3     Not,       1|    works both dogmatists and sceptics appealed, Sextus Pyrrhon.
 4     Not,       2|    to fight against perverse sceptics and let them take their
 5     Not,       2|     allow of discussion with sceptics. Philo in his innovations
 6     Not,       2| definition or give in to the sceptics (18).~§13. Rursus exorsus
 7     Not,       2|    the whole war between the sceptics and the dogmatists was waged
 8     Not,       2|    into confusion (31). Some sceptics say "we cannot help it."
 9     Not,       2|    no definite mark, say the sceptics, by which a thing may be
10     Not,       2|     at the dogmatists by the sceptics, is here put by way of retort.
11     Not,       2|    Christ om. neque; but the sceptics throughout are supposed
12     Not,       2|      these circumstances the sceptics urge that it is absurd to
13     Not,       2|  ever denied, as some modern sceptics have done, the actual existence
14     Not,       2|   etc.~§§43—45. Summary. The sceptics ought not to define, for (
15     Not,       2|  constantly in the mouths of sceptics, see e.g. Sext. P.H. I.
16     Not,       2|  sceptic paradoxes (46). The sceptics argue thus: you allow that
17     Not,       2|     favourite theme with the sceptics, while the Stoics contended
18     Not,       2|   the one for the other, the sceptics argued that it could. Quod
19     Not,       2|    the constant sport of the sceptics, cf. Sext. A.M. IX. 1. Absolute
20     Not,       2|  discussed ad nauseam by the sceptics and dogmatists. Hermagoras
21     Not,       2| tolletur: this of course the sceptics would deny. They refused
22     Not,       2|      dogmatically, while the sceptics do not. Cognitionis notam: