bold = Main text
   Liber, Caput     grey = Comment text

 1     Pre         | editions of the latter work in existence. Yet, even after Madvig'
 2     Not,       1|     taken of merely phenomenal existence (the only existence the
 3     Not,       1| phenomenal existence (the only existence the Stoics and Antiochus
 4     Not,       1|      214. Aristotle denied the existence of void either within or
 5     Not,       1|      within, while denying its existence without (Stob. I. 18, 1),
 6     Not,       1|   exact opposite affirming its existence without, and denying it
 7     Not,       1|     natura be taken as ουσια = existence substance. The meaning is "
 8     Not,       1|   while he would not allow the existence of anything incorporeal (
 9     Not,       1|      Aristotle, who proves its existence in De Coelo I. 2, in a curious
10     Not,       1|       the belief in immaterial existence The notion that νους or
11     Not,       2|      phenomenal, not essential existence. Quasi modo nascentes: Ciacconus
12     Not,       2|      αξιωμα, which affirms the existence of an abstract quality,
13     Not,       2|      to that which affirms the existence of a concrete individual.
14     Not,       2|      Pyrrh. Hyp. III. 250) the existence of which he disproves to
15     Not,       2|        assumes that the actual existence of human exertion is a sufficient
16     Not,       2| sceptics have done, the actual existence of things which cause sensations,
17     Not,       2|  maintained that, granting the existence of the things, our sensations
18     Not,       2|      the realities of material existence, the atoms and the void,
19     Not,       2|     the videri, not the actual existence of a difference, but the
20     Not,       2|     hypothetically allowed the existence of the phenomenal world,
21     Not,       2|        in Plat. Tim. 63 A. The existence of αντιποδες; was of course