bold = Main text
    Liber, Caput     grey = Comment text

  1     Pre         |              in its present shape will be of use to undergraduate
  2     Pre         |             the Academica as could not be readily got from existing
  3     Pre         |              Cicero deals.~My text may be said to be founded on that
  4     Pre         |                 My text may be said to be founded on that of Halm
  5     Pre         |                the MSS. If any apology be needed for discussing, even
  6     Pre         |                a great deal remains to be done in pointing out what
  7     Pre         |                information which would be complete for a reader who
  8     Pre         |               is hoped that it may not be without interest for maturer
  9     Pre         |                competent hand. It must be regarded as an experiment,
 10     Pre         |               only to add that I shall be thankful for notices of
 11     Int,       I|              to philosophy.11 It would be unwise to lay too much stress
 12     Int,       I|              the Greeks; but there can be little doubt that from the
 13     Int,       I|           philosophic tastes. This may be taken as a specimen of his
 14     Int,       I|           philosophical study as might be obtained from the actual
 15     Int,       I|         intrinsic value. I am sorry to be obliged to instance the
 16     Int,      II|                of philosophy, it would be indispensable to enter into
 17     Int,      II|               Academic. These it would be necessary to know, not merely
 18     Int,      II|               from this error, as will be seen from my notes on several
 19     Int,      II|            more into detail here would be to anticipate the text of
 20     Int,      II|              assertion there seemed to be something reckless and disgraceful,
 21     Int,      II|                us to find out what can be said for every view. It
 22     Int,      II|                pointed out, refuses to be bound by his former statements,
 23     Int,      II|               this practical art could be reared. This is equally
 24     Int,      II|             the charge. How is this to be reconciled with his own
 25     Int,      II|                into these subjects, to be silent97. Again, Antiochus,
 26     Int,      II|                a fear lest they should be the only true philosophers [
 27     Int,      II|                other advantages, might be happy, but could not be
 28     Int,      II|                be happy, but could not be the happiest possible102.
 29     Int,      II|          however, he will not allow to be distinctively Stoic, but
 30     Int,      II|          regard to Zeno, and there can be no doubt that he caught
 31     Int,      II|                with horror108. It must be admitted that on some points
 32     Int,      II|             Disputations he held it to be real. The most Stoic in
 33     Int,      II|              all natural theology must be, an appendage of physical
 34     Int,      II|              often believed himself to be following Aristotle. This
 35     Int,      II|      especially important. It must not be forgotten, also, that the
 36     Int,     III|             does not freely confess to be taken wholly from Greek
 37     Int,     III|          pre-existing tenets. It would be hasty to conclude that the
 38     Int,     III|                 the Latin language may be said to have been destitute
 39     Int,     III|        Epicurus. The explanation is to be found in the fact that the
 40     Int,     III|             their country118. It would be a glorious thing, he thinks,
 41     Int,     III|          oratory, which he believed to be expiring amid the din of
 42     Int,     III|                civil war122.~There can be no doubt that Cicero was
 43     Int,     III|             egotism. But it must never be forgotten that at Rome such
 44     Int,     III|                in philosophy could not be thoroughly understood till
 45     Int,     III|                Cicero never claimed to be more than an interpreter
 46     Int,     III|             only thing he proclaims to be his own is his style. Looked
 47     Int,     III|            true light, his work cannot be judged a failure. Those
 48     Int,     III|          composition, the student must be referred to the Dict. of
 49     Int,      IV|                information which would be needed in writing the Academica.
 50     Int,      IV|                under that name. It may be with reference to the progress
 51     Int,      IV|              at Astura he continued to be actively employed; but although
 52     Int,      IV|            that these two works cannot be those which Cicero describes
 53     Int,      IV|          divisions of a work. I should be quite content, then, to
 54     Int,      IV|             the Hortensius which is to be found in the letters of
 55     Int,      IV|              the Academica. This would be clear from the mention in
 56     Int,      IV|              Madvig.~[xxxvi] ~Whatever be the truth on this point,
 57     Int,      IV|               on this point, it cannot be disputed that the Hortensius
 58     Int,      IV|             circumstances there should be but one direct reference
 59     Int,      IV|         healing the incongruity should be a [xxxvii] deliberate attempt
 60     Int,      IV|                to Atticus admitted, to be false. I may note, as of
 61     Int,      IV|             that the whole work should be dedicated to Varro, or if
 62     Int,      IV|              them another place was to be found, and the remark was
 63     Int,      IV|         Atticus that Cotta should also be introduced was found impracticable180.~
 64     Int,      IV|                 as he grumbles, it may be, that my part in the treatise
 65     Int,      IV|             which you will perceive to be untrue183." Cicero, then,
 66     Int,      IV|           notion Cicero assured him to be wrong; the only cause for
 67     Int,      IV|       recipient of a dedication should be assumed ignorant of the
 68     Int,      IV|             them.... This edition will be more brilliant, more terse,
 69     Int,      IV|             that the presentation will be at your own risk. So if
 70     Int,      IV|               work to Varro, should it be judged advisable to do so,
 71     Int,      IV|          approve any course that might be taken196. Atticus wrote
 72     Int,      IV|                to Rome the books would be sent to him. "By this time,
 73     Int,      IV|             that Atticus, whatever may be the feeling of other people,
 74     Int,      IV|               unnecessary to do so may be seen from the astounding
 75     Int,      IV|               fair summary of them may be seen in the preface of Goerenz.
 76     Int,      IV|            case of both a reason is to be found in their ατριψια with
 77     Int,      IV|              of Catulus the younger to be considered a philosopher,
 78     Int,      IV|          Cicero cries, and deserves to be classed with the ancient
 79     Int,      IV|               His influence, though he be dead, will ever live among
 80     Int,      IV|              Cicero suppose himself to be allied to Catulus, that
 81     Int,      IV|               or society could fail to be well acquainted with his
 82     Int,      IV|            Academic teaching appear to be distinctly aimed at Cicero,
 83     Int,      IV|              of Academicism253 seem to be intended for Catulus, to
 84     Int,      IV|             αδηλα and ακαταληπτα would be a peculiarly congenial task.
 85     Int,      IV|              criticism would naturally be reserved for the most brilliant
 86     Int,      IV|             Hortensius257, which would be appropriate only in the
 87     Int,      IV|                have taken, there would be little difficulty in the
 88     Int,      IV|               Hortensius to give would be within the reach of any
 89     Int,      IV|               the time, and would only be put forward to show that
 90     Int,      IV|        possible for an educated man to be. Cicero's materials for
 91     Int,      IV|             schools was incomplete may be seen by the fact that he
 92     Int,      IV|                and Lucullus, there can be no doubt that Brutus occupied
 93     Int,      IV|                Stoics like Cato should be chosen to represent Antiochus,
 94     Int,      IV|             second edition276. If this be true, Brutus would not speak
 95     Int,      IV|              De Finibus, is clearly to be seen285.~Hortensius and
 96     Int,      IV|              acknowledged by Cicero to be drawn from the works of
 97     Int,      IV|              no philosopher. He has to be propped up, like Catulus,
 98     Int,      IV|               are explicitly stated to be derived from a discussion
 99     Int,      IV|       examination of its contents must be postponed till I come to
100     Int,      IV|              actual text. The same may be said of Cicero's answer.~
101     Int,      IV|               Cato and Brutus lived to be present, with Cicero, during
102     Int,      IV|                the work it is shown to be not far distant from the
103     Int,      IV|               of the Academica, it can be shown that Varro, Cicero
104     Int,      IV|                s life the student must be referred to the ordinary
105     Int,      IV|             same strain. Cicero had to be pressed to write Varro a
106     Int,      IV|       philosophical views of Varro can be gathered with tolerable
107     Int,      IV|             process of exhaustion, may be read by the curious in Augustine.
108     Int,      IV|              dedication to Varro, will be more conveniently deferred
109     Not,       1|                 62) shows that it must be inserted. Cic. writes abesse
110     Not,       1|               point. Of course if quia be read above, eum must be
111     Not,       1|                be read above, eum must be ejected altogether. Quaedam
112     Not,       1|                quoted in Davies' notes be really he) reads artibus
113     Not,       1|               to D.F. I., which should be compared with this prologue
114     Not,       1|              we shall thus, I believe, be far nearer Cicero's real
115     Not,       1|      Interrogatione: Faber saw this to be right, but a number of later
116     Not,       1|             faculty (vis, δυναμις) may be called in Gk. αρετη, in
117     Not,       1|                MSS. authority, it must be kept, and adhibenda etiam
118     Not,       1|                in that case there will be a strange change of subject
119     Not,       1|            both which expressions will be nominatives to poterit,
120     Not,       1|           poterit, further, there will be the almost impossible ellipse
121     Not,       1|         contained in this section will be elucidated later. For the
122     Not,       1|               erunt is read, erit must be supplied from it to go with
123     Not,       1|           verbs when an infinitive can be readily supplied to govern
124     Not,       1|                hold Halm and Baiter to be wrong in bracketing the
125     Not,       1|              opere: magno opere should be written in two words, not
126     Not,       1|         opinion as to the right use to be made of Greek models. †Quae
127     Not,       1|                that the populace might be enticed to read. To my mind
128     Not,       1|                cum (=quom, which would be written quō in the MSS.)
129     Not,       1|               general sense would then be "Having introduced philosophy
130     Not,       1|               musica etc. scribere may be said, but not physicam,
131     Not,       1|             think Halm's philosophe to be right, the word occurs nowhere
132     Not,       1|                 The meaning would then be "to write for philosophers,"
133     Not,       1|              above. Philosophice would be a tempting alteration, but
134     Not,       1|             sint, which is unlikely to be right. Nos in nostra: Augustine (
135     Not,       1|           which Halm himself allows to be broken in two similar passages,
136     Not,       1|                the passage, and cannot be supported by 12, Brut. 306,
137     Not,       1|              The position of iam would be strange, in the passage
138     Not,       1|              the passage which used to be compared, Pro Cluentio 16,
139     Not,       1|            vetus and nova can scarcely be so barely used to denote
140     Not,       1|      Apollodori. Possibly the MSS. may be right, and libros may be
141     Not,       1|               be right, and libros may be supplied from libris above,
142     Not,       1|                 the word libros has to be supplied from the preceding
143     Not,       1|              note, is wild, and cannot be justified by D.F. V. 13.~§
144     Not,       1|                adsideamus, which would be wrong here. Sane istud:
145     Not,       1|                not familiar, would not be given without the name of
146     Not,       1|           natura is personified, if 28 be compared with Tim. c. 1,
147     Not,       1|              with Tim. c. 1, this will be clear. Involutis = veiled;
148     Not,       1|               same view is supposed to be found in Aristotle, see
149     Not,       1|               MSS. omit et, but it may be doubted whether Cic. would
150     Not,       1|           proofs of this new Latin may be sampled by Ac. II. 1, 43.
151     Not,       1|             The division itself cannot be traced farther back than
152     Not,       1|            D.F. V. 2427, which should be closely compared with our
153     Not,       1|               will show the meaning to be the distinct marking of
154     Not,       1|          phrases are sometimes said to be Peripatetic, if so, they
155     Not,       1|              are not necessary, as may be seen from Topica 80, causa
156     Not,       1|              Peripatetics is stated to be το κατ' αρετην ζην εν τοις
157     Not,       1|               ευγενεια δυναστεια would be included in cetera. The
158     Not,       1|               strange, and was felt to be so by the writer of Halm'
159     Not,       1|                Antiochus, who, as will be seen from Augustine XIX.
160     Not,       1|              branch of the τριλογια to be καθ' ‛αυτοαιρετον. Aut
161     Not,       1|             like hicque, sicque, would be un-Ciceronian. Voluptatibus:
162     Not,       1|             Aristotle's doctrine is to be got from Schwegler, Handbook,
163     Not,       1|               R. and P. 273 sq. should be consulted for the important
164     Not,       1|         difficult to see why it should be introduced here. Unless
165     Not,       1|            introduced here. Unless est be taken of merely phenomenal
166     Not,       1|           about space the student must be referred to the histories
167     Not,       1|            used for quale; it ought to be used of Force only, not
168     Not,       1|              that these nouns ought to be treated as Latin first declension
169     Not,       1|                of Aristotle which will be found in R. and P. 297.
170     Not,       1|               of the four elements may be gained from the section
171     Not,       1|                και του παντος. It will be there seen that Cic. is
172     Not,       1|                αρχαι, which term would be reserved for the primary
173     Not,       1|             Aristotle, whose ideas may be gathered from R. and P.
174     Not,       1|                utro. The meaning would be "since force plays this
175     Not,       1|              perfectly sound if natura be taken as ουσια = existence
176     Not,       1|              Ac. II. 42. If in utroque be read above, in omni natura
177     Not,       1|            Stoic sources, even if they be got at second hand through
178     Not,       1|               D. II. 75. It should not be forgotten, however, that
179     Not,       1|         believing that our world would be destroyed by fire (Diog.
180     Not,       1|              that of the Stoics, is to be found in Timaeus p. 47,
181     Not,       1|              that no real parallel can be found to this in Cic., it
182     Not,       1| Academico-Peripatetic school. This may be an oversight, but to say
183     Not,       1|                 The confusion must not be laid at Cicero's door, for
184     Not,       1|                no true information can be got from sensation, whereas,
185     Not,       1|              the word εμε is stated to be an absurdity, since it implies
186     Not,       1|          expression therefore ought to be τους εμε. Continenter: ουνεχως;
187     Not,       1|         Definitiones rerum: these must be carefully distinguished
188     Not,       1|                importance to Plato may be seen from the Politicus
189     Not,       1|             subject as clear as it can be made to any one who has
190     Not,       1|               it, so it may speciously be said to belong to the old
191     Not,       1|              of the MSS., which cannot be defended. Orelli's reference
192     Not,       1|                possession of virtue to be the important thing, although
193     Not,       1|          element, and believed fire to be the universal substance,
194     Not,       1|   disputationes philosophiae would not be Latin. The em. is rendered
195     Not,       1|           supposes, a reader would not be much incommoded. Labefactavit,
196     Not,       1|  Academico-Peripatetic school can only be explained by the fact that
197     Not,       1|              knowledge, which it would be absurd to attempt to convey
198     Not,       1|             for suspecting the text to be corrupt, the heroic remedy
199     Not,       1|             the place of sumenda, must be rejected. Nor can anything
200     Not,       1|             rejected. Nor can anything be said for Goerenz's plan,
201     Not,       1|               remota. If this language be closely pressed, the αποπροηγμενα
202     Not,       1|                his words in D.F. V. 90 be pressed, the sumenda are
203     Not,       1|                II. 88 frui dolore must be construed together, and
204     Not,       1|             ratione esse dicerent must be repeated but dicerent merely,
205     Not,       1|                αρεται of Arist., could be said to belong to the reason,
206     Not,       1|          reason, or (as the case might be) by habit." Ea genera virtutum:
207     Not,       1|          asserted the nature of man to be one and indivisible and
208     Not,       1|                 εξις, a use which must be clearly distinguished from
209     Not,       1|            that the Stoic sapiens must be emotionless (Zeller 228
210     Not,       1|              and of giving this out to be Aristotle's opinion. The
211     Not,       1|               as an αρχη κινησεως must be ακινητος, but Cic. had no
212     Not,       1|              These considerations will be enough to show that neither
213     Not,       1|              Iunctos: how can anything be a compound of one thing?
214     Not,       1|               quidem probably ought to be read, see 18. Adsensionem =
215     Not,       1|             emits the visum is said to be καταληπτον, but, as we shall
216     Not,       1|              is copied by Cic. and may be seen in several passages
217     Not,       1|              criticism before it could be believed. This was, as Zeller
218     Not,       1|           appear if the whole sentence be read uno haustu; Zeller
219     Not,       1|        principia solum: there seems to be a ref. to those αρχαι της
220     Not,       1|    subject-matter of this section will be found in my notes on the
221     Not,       1|              tenet held by Socrates to be certain; and maintained
222     Not,       1|                of equal strength could be urged in favour of the truth
223     Not,       1|           reading defensible, if verum be taken as the neut. adj.
224     Not,       1|               Yet I think the truth to be ... that it is to be thought,"
225     Not,       1|                to be ... that it is to be thought," etc. The edd.
226     Not,       1|           hundred other passages might be quoted from Cic.~§44. Non
227     Not,       2|           Grundz p. 326. A diver would be in exactly the position
228     Not,       2|               To these should probably be added fragm. 32. Fr. 19
229     Not,       2|               against criminals cannot be maintained, so after a certain
230     Not,       2|           reference in Nonius ought to be to Book IV. and not Book
231     Not,       2|         assuming absolute knowledge to be attainable. The same line
232     Not,       2|               reference in Nonius must be wrong. The talk about freedom
233     Not,       2|                all these passages will be found in my notes on the
234     Not,       2|            changed into the former may be supported from I. 6, which
235     Not,       2|                quoted wrongly. It will be noted that the fragments
236     Not,       2|            this fragment must probably be referred.~34. This important
237     Not,       2|           Carneadean probabile, as may be seen from the words probabiliter
238     Not,       2|               Academic school must not be supposed to have no truths
239     Not,       2|              so general a nature as to be taken from a stock which
240     Not,       2|                the former which are to be gathered from the bishop'
241     Not,       2|                we have what appears to be a summary of the lost part
242     Not,       2|               The New Academy must not be regarded as having revolted
243     Not,       2|               to know philosophy, must be referred to the examples
244     Not,       2|             that famous men should not be introduced into dialogues
245     Not,       2|               then, when they meet, to be silent or to talk about
246     Not,       2|               been proposed, would not be Latin, see De Leg. II. 16.
247     Not,       2|             Pace here perhaps ought to be taken adverbially, like
248     Not,       2|                D. I. 57. litteris must be an ablative of the instrument.
249     Not,       2|                I take of course rex to be nom. to legisset, the suggestion
250     Not,       2|                 this ought properly to be profuerit, but the conditional
251     Not,       2|             him to Egypt, he could not be pro quaestor. But surely
252     Not,       2|                the first year he would be pro quaestor. Dav. reads
253     Not,       2|            oratorical works may fairly be said to have this character;
254     Not,       2|              divisssiones, asserted to be Ciceronian in Quint. Inst.
255     Not,       2|               has Tretilius, which may be a mistake for Tertilius,
256     Not,       2|                from the word for four, be read? Petrilius and Pompilius
257     Not,       2|                 a Peripatetic, who may be the same. Dio seems unknown.
258     Not,       2|              that no argument ought to be held with a sceptic, since
259     Not,       2|                time, and indeed it may be doubted whether the best
260     Not,       2|                so severe a judge as to be called scopulus reorum.
261     Not,       2|           schemes of Gracchus seems to be that they were consulted
262     Not,       2|              and if they did, Cic. may be allowed the inconsistency.~§
263     Not,       2|                If kept the sense would be: "but let us suppose, for
264     Not,       2|             the former sentence cannot be the subj. of the verb, he
265     Not,       2|                 which Goer. asserts to be the usual form. Comprehensio:
266     Not,       2|              exact meaning of this may be seen from D.F. II. 107,
267     Not,       2|                of this definition will be found in Zeller 86. The
268     Not,       2|  εναπομεμαγμενη in the Gk. It must not be forgotten that the Stoics
269     Not,       2|             Stoics held a sensation to be a real alteration (‛ετεροιωσις)
270     Not,       2|     Carneadeans believed all things to be ακαταληπτα, Philo held them
271     Not,       2|         ακαταληπτα, Philo held them to be καταληπτα, and Numenius
272     Not,       2|              us that he held things to be in their own nature καταληπτα (‛
273     Not,       2|      καταληπτικη φαντασια professed to be able to get at the thing
274     Not,       2|           where we may suppose Cic. to be expressing the views of
275     Not,       2|              defined the cognisable to be "quod impressum esset e
276     Not,       2|             were apostles of doubt, to be correct (12). I may add
277     Not,       2|              of the senses must always be removed, in practice we
278     Not,       2|               these ideas may possibly be false, logic memory, and
279     Not,       2|            takes action might prove to be false? (23) How can wisdom
280     Not,       2|             false? (23) How can wisdom be wisdom if she has nothing
281     Not,       2|            proceed (24). Credence must be given to the thing which
282     Not,       2|                and uncertain can never be discovered. Rational proof
283     Not,       2|         something, once veiled, should be brought to light (26). Syllogisms
284     Not,       2|           perception is impossible, to be a certain perception of
285     Not,       2|            This, Carneades said, would be inconsistent, since the
286     Not,       2|             supposition that there can be any true perception (28).
287     Not,       2|                the Academics could not be held to be philosophers
288     Not,       2|         Academics could not be held to be philosophers if they had
289     Not,       2|              all sensation, per se, to be infallible. The chief authorities
290     Not,       2|            τροπος for showing sense to be untrustworthy) ‛ο παρα τας
291     Not,       2|               true, a man might really be in pain when he fancied
292     Not,       2|                pleasure and pain would be obscured. Sentiet ... insaniat:
293     Not,       2|              of Sext. Continget: "will be the natural consequence."
294     Not,       2|            quite wrong in taking it to be a trans. of καταληψις here.
295     Not,       2|          happiness of the sapiens must be proof against the rack;
296     Not,       2|            sapiens of the Academy must be desertor officiorum omnium.
297     Not,       2|           sceptic must, if consistent, be ανενεργητος εν βιωι (Sext.
298     Not,       2|              Oportet videri: "ought to be seen." For this use cf.
299     Not,       2|           without the preposition) can be right in De Div. II. 102,
300     Not,       2|               which Guietus thought to be ratio above. Αποδειξις:
301     Not,       2|             περαινοντα (if the reading be right).~§27. Notio: another
302     Not,       2|       concludere. It is more likely to be a trans. of συναγειν, and
303     Not,       2|              wrong, for if the ellipse be supplied the construction
304     Not,       2|         dogmatist argues that if proof be impossible, as the sceptic
305     Not,       2|               sceptic says, there must be a proof to show it impossible;
306     Not,       2|              the sceptic doctrine must be provable. Cf. 109 of this
307     Not,       2|               they professed it not to be, a fixed dogma. Sentitis
308     Not,       2|                III. 26. Fluctuare: "to be at sea," Halm fluctuari,
309     Not,       2|            deny that any certainty can be attained through the senses,
310     Not,       2|              is absurd, a thing cannot be known at all unless by such
311     Not,       2|           other thing. How can a thing be said to be "evidently white,"
312     Not,       2|             How can a thing be said to be "evidently white," if the
313     Not,       2|        possibility remains that it may be really black? Again, how
314     Not,       2|                 Again, how can a thing be "evident" at all if it may
315     Not,       2|              evident" at all if it may be after all a mere phantom (
316     Not,       2|         sceptics, by which a thing may be known. Their "probability"
317     Not,       2|            than "source" here. It will be noted that συγκαταθεσις
318     Not,       2|              concomitant sensations to be in harmony with it. (Sext.
319     Not,       2|             sensations themselves must be examined; the time at which
320     Not,       2|            appearances, and you cannot be sure of uniting each appearance
321     Not,       2|              Argumentum: Cic. seems to be thinking of the word τεκμηριον,
322     Not,       2|               require a firm assent to be given to some phenomena,
323     Not,       2|                by other things, cannot be partly capable of being
324     Not,       2|           capable, (2) sensations must be assumed to be of the same
325     Not,       2|          sensations must be assumed to be of the same form if our
326     Not,       2|             the false cannot of course be real perceptions, while
327     Not,       2|    indistinguishable from false cannot be partly perceptions, partly
328     Not,       2|                false sensations cannot be perceptions, (2) sensations
329     Not,       2|   indistinguishable from false, cannot be partly perceptions, partly
330     Not,       2|                show that credit cannot be given to either class (42). [
331     Not,       2|            things into those which can be perceived (known with certainty)
332     Not,       2|           reality and unreality) could be affirmed of things, though
333     Not,       2|               at its source, we should be able to tell whether to
334     Not,       2|                 1) a definition cannot be a definition of two things, (
335     Not,       2|             one thing, that thing must be capable of being thoroughly
336     Not,       2|              more important, must also be known. In illa vera we have
337     Not,       2|               have shown emendation to be unnecessary, cf. 42 dividunt
338     Not,       2|             visa, in themselves, might be true or false, but affirmed
339     Not,       2|             really existing things may be mistaken the one for the
340     Not,       2|               resemble real ones as to be indistinguishable from them? (
341     Not,       2|               in which a sensation may be false, (1) it may come from
342     Not,       2|             really existent thing, but be supposed by the person who
343     Not,       2|             the person who feels it to be caused by a totally different
344     Not,       2|            different thing, (2) it may be a mere φαντασμα or αναπλασμα
345     Not,       2|             difficult passage can only be properly explained in connection
346     Not,       2|               the argument is meant to be based on the assumption
347     Not,       2|                the assumption known to be Stoic, omnia deum posse.
348     Not,       2|              resemble true ones, or to be only with difficulty distinguishable
349     Not,       2|                the true, or finally to be utterly indistinguishable
350     Not,       2|                to manufacture so as to be probable"). It must not
351     Not,       2|                probable"). It must not be repeated after the second
352     Not,       2|                or the whole sense will be inverted and this section
353     Not,       2|           allow), why should there not be false sensations so probable
354     Not,       2|           sensations so probable as to be with difficulty distinguishable
355     Not,       2|             them is present, it cannot be distinguished from the other;
356     Not,       2|              II. 33 ut should probably be written (with Manut. and
357     Not,       2|      Proferremus: this must apparently be added to the exx. qu. by
358     Not,       2|    misunderstood, I note that they can be most rationally explained
359     Not,       2|             Albane maneres" may fairly be translated, "hadst thou
360     Not,       2|             kind. Such a condition may be expressed without si, just
361     Not,       2|               no elucidation, I cannot be certain.]~§§5463. Summary.
362     Not,       2|            absurd, viz. that there may be distinction between individual
363     Not,       2|                said that he should not be surprised if the speech
364     Not,       2|              two phenomena could never be great enough to render it
365     Not,       2|           maintained by the Stoics may be stated thus suo quidque
366     Not,       2|             non patitur ut and it will be evident at a glance that
367     Not,       2|            brackets ita; if any change be needed, it would be better
368     Not,       2|             change be needed, it would be better to place it before
369     Not,       2|               are quite content not to be able to distinguish between
370     Not,       2|              shall not on that account be led into a mistake for our
371     Not,       2|              for surely it must always be easier to distinguish between
372     Not,       2|           removed a better sense would be given. It has often been
373     Not,       2|               on 33. A veris: if visis be supplied the statement corresponds
374     Not,       2|              Academic belief, if rebus be meant, it is wide of the
375     Not,       2|                  retentio: supposed to be a gloss by Man., Lamb.,
376     Not,       2|                must have been Cicero), be attributed to the first
377     Not,       2|                Cic. of the pres., must be read. Approbatione omni:
378     Not,       2|           adjectival, aliquis must not be written with impersonal
379     Not,       2|                person aliquis ought to be written (Myrmecides in 120,
380     Not,       2|                 yet I feel that it can be answered. First, however,
381     Not,       2|               gives his assent he will be obliged to opine, but he
382     Not,       2|             and false (67). Even if it be so the mere habit of assenting
383     Not,       2|           argument. But if the passage be translated thus, "Carneades
384     Not,       2|              like this could adsentiri be followed by an accusative
385     Not,       2|          excellence of Faber's em. may be felt by comparing that of
386     Not,       2|               60, T.D. IV. 9, and must be carefully distinguished
387     Not,       2|             nomen esse: a modern would be inclined to write honestum,
388     Not,       2|            Socrates and Plato must not be classed with these. Why?
389     Not,       2|             sincerity of Arcesilas may be seen thus (76). Zeno held
390     Not,       2|           supposed the true reading to be novas, which would be written
391     Not,       2|               to be novas, which would be written nobas, and then
392     Not,       2|              the last men who ought to be charged with scepticism.
393     Not,       2|              65. Fulcire porticum: "to be the pillar of the Stoic
394     Not,       2|        different from what it seems to be"—the two meanings of falsum
395     Not,       2|               consensit additum should be construed together, "agreed
396     Not,       2|            point. Qy, should concessit be read, as in 118 concessisse
397     Not,       2|            only from the sensation can be false, not the sensation
398     Not,       2|            than the bent oar, what can be greater than the sun? Still
399     Not,       2|             and Epicurus thinks he may be a little broader or narrower
400     Not,       2|            blinking facts which cannot be disproved, see 19. Quod
401     Not,       2|               Manut. If, however, quod be taken as the conjunction,
402     Not,       2|               abesset: "whatever might be 1800 stadia distant," aberat
403     Not,       2|         Heraclitus asserted the sun to be a foot wide, he does not
404     Not,       2|       ανθρωπειου, which is affirmed to be the opinion of Heraclitus
405     Not,       2|               who understood caelum to be the heaven, and not γλυφειον,
406     Not,       2|                 which does not seem to be a Ciceronian word. Halm'
407     Not,       2|              taking ceteris omnibus to be the abl. neut. "all the
408     Not,       2|            common with the meaning "to be drunk," as in Plaut. Mostellaria
409     Not,       2|             that these sophisms should be made exceptions to the rules
410     Not,       2|          remarks that an art is not to be condemned as useless merely
411     Not,       2|              the Stoic λογικη, it must be remembered, includedρητορικη.
412     Not,       2|               false sorites, which may be briefly described thus:
413     Not,       2|               answer "Yes," there will be a difference of one grain
414     Not,       2|            Dives pauper, etc.: it will be easily seen that the process
415     Not,       2|        questioning above described can be applied to any relative
416     Not,       2|                 Contra Ac. III. 14 may be a reminiscence. Illustribus:
417     Not,       2|               phrase primum augendi to be Latin.~§95. Tollit ... superiora:
418     Not,       2|         context of that passage should be carefully read, along with
419     Not,       2|     construction, which in Greek would be marked by μεν and δε, has
420     Not,       2|             supposes the infinitive to be an addition of the copyists.~§§
421     Not,       2|                7. Ut Poenus: "as might be expected from a Carthaginian;"
422     Not,       2|              visa into those which can be perceived and those which
423     Not,       2|                 The general sense will be as follows. "There are two
424     Not,       2|         questions, provided his answer be not taken to imply absolute
425     Not,       2|               the result of which will be that he will neither absolutely
426     Not,       2|               Epicurus? If nothing can be remembered which is not
427     Not,       2|       absolutely true, then these will be true (106). Probability
428     Not,       2|               an em. is not needed may be seen from D.F. II. 70. negat
429     Not,       2|                41 sensus is defined to be id quod est sensu comprehensum,
430     Not,       2|              possible that manum is to be understood. For the suppressed
431     Not,       2|              exacting, my course would be easier; I should not much
432     Not,       2|             nimio minares, which would be much nearer the MSS.; cf.
433     Not,       2|        teachers, great men though they be, he must reject (118). Whatever
434     Not,       2|               119). How much better to be free, as I am and not compelled
435     Not,       2|              who hold that nothing can be known about them! (123)
436     Not,       2|           Xenocrates. Our sapiens will be unable to decide (124).
437     Not,       2|                 127). Our sapiens will be delighted if he attains
438     Not,       2|               the same level. You must be prepared to asseverate no
439     Not,       2|              admit that all things can be perceived no more and no
440     Not,       2|          conjecture. If anything is to be introduced, I would rather
441     Not,       2|              aliquem ius iurandum will be found in Caes. Bell. Civ.
442     Not,       2|           admits the bases of proof to be which Archimedes uses, will
443     Not,       2|                student must in general be referred to R. and P., Schwegler,
444     Not,       2|            enumeration of schools will be found in Sext. P.H. III.
445     Not,       2|             always considers Thales to be sapientissimus e septem (
446     Not,       2|                that that letter cannot be genuine, since in it the
447     Not,       2|         throughout, no one thing could be more or less known than
448     Not,       2|              text is sound however may be seen from T.D. II. 30 optare
449     Not,       2|               good voice is a thing to be prayed for, and not to be
450     Not,       2|              be prayed for, and not to be got by exertion. There is
451     Not,       2|             doctrine. It seems also to be found in Philolaus, see
452     Not,       2|                Nobilitatis: this is to be explained by referring to
453     Not,       2|         personal convicium supposed to be directly addressed to Cic.
454     Not,       2|              retained complebitur must be read. Madv. Opusc. II. 282
455     Not,       2|                are irate (132). I must be careful not to assent to
456     Not,       2|          systems can with plausibility be defended (138). I gravitate
457     Not,       2|                and Megarian schools to be so closely related as to
458     Not,       2|                Simile ought perhaps to be sui simile as in Tim. c.
459     Not,       2|            this as well as πραιοτης to be a name for the sceptic τελος,
460     Not,       2|           finis of Polemo is stated to be secundum naturam vivere,
461     Not,       2|           Antiochean doctrines were to be found in Polemo; see I.
462     Not,       2|               Carneades intended it to be different, as he did not
463     Not,       2|              are too unsatisfactory to be enumerated.~§133. Non posse ...
464     Not,       2|                D. V. that there cannot be degrees in happiness. Tum
465     Not,       2|            voluit "gave himself out to be a physical philosopher:"
466     Not,       2|                 which Epicurus held to be the highest pleasure. Cum
467     Not,       2|              par, so that cum must not be taken closely with depugnet;
468     Not,       2|              is no knowledge there can be no art. How would Zeuxis
469     Not,       2|                 were needed, would not be so utterly improbable as
470     Not,       2|            that the artisans might all be at the meeting, for this
471     Not,       2|                quidem: "nor would they be angry;" cf. n. on. I. 5.
472     Not,       2|                meaning of this was "to be a bystander," or "to be
473     Not,       2|                be a bystander," or "to be an eye-witness," see Corssen
474     Not,       2|          involved in 104, which should be closely compared. A contrast
475     Not,       2|             absolute assent) is not to be given to phenomena. This
Best viewed with any browser at 800x600 or 768x1024 on Tablet PC
IntraText® (VA1) - Some rights reserved by EuloTech SRL - 1996-2009. Content in this page is licensed under a Creative Commons License