bold = Main text
   Liber, Caput     grey = Comment text

 1     Int,      IV|     of the genuine Carneadean distinction between αδηλα and ακαταληπτα
 2     Not,       1|      does not observe Varro's distinction (De L. L. IX. 1) which confines
 3     Not,       1|    toto in partibus: the same distinction is in Stob. Eth. II. 6,
 4     Not,       1|  included in cetera. The same distinction is drawn in Aug. VIII. 8.
 5     Not,       1|    show that Cic. drew little distinction between the Stoic τα πρωτα
 6     Not,       1|      exists. In res duas: the distinction between Force and Matter,
 7     Not,       1|      probably apprehended the distinction as modified by the Stoics,
 8     Not,       1|        2 (R. and P. 294). The distinction puzzled Plutarch (quoted
 9     Not,       1| definitiones nominum, see the distinction drawn after Aristotle in
10     Not,       1|      to have a remnant of the distinction drawn by Arist. between
11     Not,       2|       Varro, and was a man of distinction also; see Dict. Biog. Magna
12     Not,       2|     that Luc. had served with distinction in the Social War and the
13     Not,       2|    360. Rerum, verborum: same distinction in De Or. II. 359. Oblivisci
14     Not,       2|      and vice versa; thus the distinction between pleasure and pain
15     Not,       2|      eiusmodi genus sit: this distinction is as old as Plato and Arist.,
16     Not,       2|    absolute certainty of this distinction than of the other. Communis:
17     Not,       2|    Sext.~§§37—40. Summary The distinction of an animal is to act.
18     Not,       2| Lucullus answers that, did no distinction exist, he would give up
19     Not,       2|        viz. that there may be distinction between individual sensations,