bold = Main text
   Liber, Caput     grey = Comment text

 1     Int,      II|      the truth, has no truth to follow89. The probable is for it
 2     Not,       1|       that Halm and Baiter both follow Ernesti in his hypercritical
 3     Not,       1|     also prefer. De, ab, and ex follow haurire indifferently in
 4     Not,       2|   particular philosophy which I follow—the Academic. This is natural,
 5     Not,       2|      sensations they profess to follow. The doctrine that true
 6     Not,       2| division only; the sapiens will follow probability, as in many
 7     Not,       2|        MSS. Halm and also Bait. follow Christ in reading est, probabile
 8     Not,       2|     Tamen ought in that case to follow dicimus, and it is noteworthy
 9     Not,       2|    common in Cic., and I cannot follow Halm in altering the reading
10     Not,       2|        demagogue, and claims to follow the aristocracy of philosophy.
11     Not,       2|        129-131). If I desire to follow the Stoics, Antiochus will
12     Not,       2|        not allow me, while if I follow Polemo, the Stoics are irate (
13     Not,       2|        quaeque, Halm and Bait., follow Moser in writing Quid? si
14     Not,       2|         make in utramque partem follow dicantur, on Orelli's suggestion.
15     Not,       2|    Sequi volebat: "professed to follow;" cf. D.F. V. 13 Strato
16     Not,       2|         navibus. Halm and Bait. follow Christ's conj. verenti,
17     Not,       2|  disagree (142). Does Antiochus follow any of these? Why, he never
18     Not,       2|      fondness for making the ut follow closely on the negative: