bold = Main text
   Liber, Caput     grey = Comment text

 1       I,    IIII|         conlucet.... = Lucullus §105.~24. Nonius p. 107. Exanclare
 2      II,   XXXII|      quae nulla re impedirentur. 105. Haec si vobis non probamus,
 3     Not,       1|          variant, cf. De Off. I. 105~§4. Deliberatam—agitatam:
 4     Not,       1|        similar passages, II. 20, 105. Sed da mihi nunc, satisne
 5     Not,       1|       Schwegler, Handbook, pp 99—105. R. and P. 273 sq. should
 6     Not,       2|       closely resembles Lucullus 105.~8. The fact that the eye
 7     Not,       2|       than a dogmatist (see Luc. 105, 120, and Cic.'s words in
 8     Not,       2|        to flavum for ravum (Luc. 105). Most likely an alteration
 9     Not,       2|        for petty variations; see 105, also T.D. V. 43, De Div.
10     Not,       2|         as Klotz; cf. M.D.F. II. 105, to whose exx. add De Div.
11     Not,       2|       and are quoted in N.D. II. 105, 106. Phoenices: the same
12     Not,       2|          verum testem, etc.: cf. 105. For the om. of te before
13     Not,       2|   addition of the copyists.~§§98—105. Summary. In order to overthrow
14     Not,       2|          reading to approbavit.~§105. Lucem eripimus: cf. 30.~§§
15     Not,       2|        Lucem eripimus: cf. 30.~§§105—111. Summary. You must see,
16     Not,       2|         dogmatism is overthrown (105). You asked how memory was
17     Not,       2| perceiving the difference (111).~105. Inducto ... prob.: so Aug.
18     Not,       2|        to Epicurus in De Off. I. 105, Lael. 20, 32. T.D. V. 73,