bold = Main text
   Liber, Caput     grey = Comment text

 1     Pre         |   explanatory notes is that of Goerenz, published in 1810. To the
 2     Pre         |       and untrustworthiness of Goerenz's learning Madvig's pages
 3     Pre         |        far superior to that of Goerenz, is very deficient when
 4    Abbr         |    Forc. = Forcellini; Goer. = Goerenz; Herm. = Hermann; Lamb. =
 5     Int,      IV|      be seen in the preface of Goerenz. I now proceed to examine
 6     Not,       1|          Some editors stumble (Goerenz miserably) by taking intervallo
 7     Not,       1|       miserable gloss; Schutz, Goerenz's echo expels the words.
 8     Not,       1|     who probably only exist in Goerenz's note, is wild, and cannot
 9     Not,       1| renovari. Orelli—who speaks of Goerenz's "praestantissima recensio,"
10     Not,       1|       πρωτα τη φυσει is one of Goerenz's numerous forgeries. The
11     Not,       1|      in qua) is violent, while Goerenz's resort to partem rerum
12     Not,       1|       take for quaecunque. Cf. Goerenz's statement "negari omnino
13     Not,       1|       can anything be said for Goerenz's plan, who distorts the
14     Not,       1|      the vulg comprehensibile. Goerenz's note on these words is
15     Not,       1|  Democritus, see R. and P. 50. Goerenz's note here is an extraordinary
16     Not,       2|    impugned Lambinus' reading. Goerenz indeed, followed by the
17     Not,       2|     Madvig's strong remarks on Goerenz's note here (D.F. II. 27).