bold = Main text
   Liber, Caput     grey = Comment text

 1     Not,       1|      otherwise, Ignorance (41). Perception, thus defined, he regarded
 2     Not,       1| properly denotes the process of perception in the abstract, not the
 3     Not,       1|    abstract, not the individual perception. The Greeks, however, themselves
 4     Not,       1|           2) to denote a single perception, which use is copied by
 5     Not,       2|         truth of the individual perception of sense.~§§19—29. Summary.
 6     Not,       2|      impossible (22). That true perception is possible, is seen from
 7     Not,       2|       to allow their dogma that perception is impossible, to be a certain
 8     Not,       2|     impossible, to be a certain perception of their minds. This, Carneades
 9     Not,       2|      that there can be any true perception (28). Antiochus declared
10     Not,       2|       sensation which is also a perception (40). Two admissions, they
11     Not,       2|   either class (42). [The word "perception" is used to mean "a certainly
12     Not,       2| argument must tend to show that perception in the Stoic sense is impossible (
13     Not,       2|        demanded a definition of perception. This definition Arcesilas
14     Not,       2|        Do away with opinion and perception, and the εποχη of Arcesilas
15     Not,       2|      the tenet of Epicurus, and perception becomes impossible (101).