bold = Main text
   Liber, Caput     grey = Comment text

 1     Int,      IV| Hortensius is an error162. The discussion in the Academica Priora
 2     Int,      IV|  central point or pivot of the discussion. With this arrangement none
 3     Int,      IV|      ground marked out for the discussion272, but only cursorily,
 4     Int,      IV|   Lucullus."~The day after the discussion narrated in the Catulus,
 5     Int,      IV|    stated to be derived from a discussion in which he had heard Antiochus
 6     Not,       2|    whole four books formed one discussion, finished within the limits
 7     Not,       2|  single day. Why interrupt the discussion by the insertion of a prologue
 8     Not,       2|  Hortensius, the day after the discussion reported in the Catulus (
 9     Not,       2|  doctrines had suffered in the discussion of the day before (10).
10     Not,       2|       Most however do allow of discussion with sceptics. Philo in
11     Not,       2|  making it a necessity for the discussion; cf. De Leg. I. 21. Consentaneum
12     Not,       2|     and false altogether." The discussion here really turns on the
13     Not,       2|        often quotes him in the discussion of this and similar subjects.