Parte, Capitolo, Capoverso
1 3, 2, 64, p. 73 | negant, ut Suar. Lugo Laym. Anacl. Viva, etc. sed nos cum
2 4, 3, 49, p. 88 | excipitur cum Suar. Castrop. Anacl. et Elbel, si tu pecuniam
3 4, 3, 49, p. 88 | tamen dicendum cum Suar. Anacl. Salmant., etc. si ipse
4 4, 3, 52, p. 89 | Suarez, Less., Sanch., Laym., Anacl., Ronc.,Croix, etc. dictae
5 6, 1, 10, p. 120 | Laym., Sa, Castrop., Ronc., Anacl., Holzman,e tc. dum pingere (
6 7, 4, 17, p. 138 | communiter dicunt Castropal. Anacl. Roncag. Barb. Holzman,
7 7, 4, 45, p. 149 | Nihilominus adnotant Barbosa Anacl. et Tournely, et alii communiter,
8 9, 0, 34, p. 185 | Petrocorens, Sanchez Bonac. Anacl. Spor. Salm. Holzman et
9 9, 0, 34, p. 185 | Azor. Navar. Vas. Bonac. Anacl. Salmantic. etc. licere
10 9, 0, 34, p. 186 | Silvest. Sa Roncaglia, Bonac. Anacl. Salmant. Holzman Elbel
11 10, 1, 6, p. 188 | Navarr. Cabas. Sot. Less. Anacl. Covar. contra Petrocor.
12 10, 1, 10, p. 190 | absentes, ut dicunt Less. Anacl. et Verde cum comm. contra
13 10, 1, 10, p. 190 | tempus 40. annorum? Affirmant Anacl. Hostiensis Panorm. etc.
14 10, 1, 11, p. 191 | veritas non reperitur, dicunt Anacl. La-Croix et Lugo cum Molin.
15 10, 3, 27, p. 207 | facere, ut admittunt Vasq. Anacl. Escob. cum s. Thoma; sed
16 10, 4, 138, p. 238| Nav. Caiet. Sanch. Tourn. Anacl. Azor. Lugo cum s. Bernardina
17 12, 1, 20, p. 264 | Tol. Castrop. Sanch. Laym. Anacl. Roncag. Holzm. Salm., etc.
18 13, 2, 36, p. 290 | Lugo Fill. Vasq. Holzman Anacl. Croix etc.; sed probabilius
19 13, 2, 36, p. 290 | Lugo Fill. Vasq. Holzman Anacl. Croix etc. Et probatur
20 13, 2, 45, p. 294 | Fagnan. Habert Petrocor. Anacl. Holzm. et alii cum s. Thoma3;
21 13, 2, 45, p. 294 | impendit, ut dicunt Less. Anacl. et alii5.~
22 13, 2, 58, p. 298 | Nav. Suar. Sanch. Laym. Anacl. Ronc. Croix, etc. praefatae
23 13, 3, 64, p. 301 | Nav. Tol. Bonac. Holzm. Anacl., etc. damnare enim innocentem
24 14, 2, 12, p. 316 | sententia affirmat; sed dubitnt Anacl. Conc. et Platel. et dubitat
25 14, 3, 47, p. 328 | Fras. Wig. Castrop. Bonac. Anacl. Salm. Croix etc. quia de
26 15, 3, 49, p. 349 | posse; ita Roncagl. Gob. Anacl., etc. Tertia dicit non
27 15, 4, 73, p. 358 | extendunt ad 15. ut Bonac. Anacl. Diana, et Elbel; pro hoc
28 15, 4, 75, p. 359 | ut dicunt ipse Roncaglia, Anacl. Sporer, Elbel, etc. Advertunt
29 15, 4, 79, p. 361 | communiter reprobatum), Tournel. Anacl. Salm., etc. adversus Scotum
30 16, 2, 22, p. 378 | Negant communius Lugo, Anacl.Ronc. Viva, Spor. etc.,
31 16, 3, 28, p. 382 | cum Suar. Lugo, Bon. Ronc. Anacl. Holzm., etc. (contra Caiet.
32 16, 3, 30, p. 383 | Sanchez. Suarez. Boanc. Anacl. Ronc. Salmant. Holzm. et
33 16, 4, 50, p. 393 | Natalis ab Alex. Antoine, Anacl.; ita etiam s. Carolus Borrom.
34 16, 6, 108, p. 420| Castropal. Bonac. Ponz. Coninch. Anacl. Escob. Ronc. Spor. ./.
35 16, 9, 182, p. 457| communem Laym. Castropal. Anacl. Salm. Vivae Mazzot. etc.
36 18, 1, 5, p. 470 | dicunt Bonac. Ronc. Holzm. et Anacl. Et idem puto dicendum,
37 18, 1, 6, p. 471 | Escob. Boss. Holzm. Salm. Anacl., quae docet istum non posse
38 18, 1, 9, p. 472 | Elbel, Laym. Soto, Holzm. Anacl. Croix, etc. in omni casu
39 18, 1, 9, p. 472 | non improbabiliter Holzm. Anacl. Gutt. et Pichler, sentiunt
40 18, 1, 11, p. 474 | Castropal. Suar. Vasq. Salm. Anacl. Ronc. Holz. etc., quia
41 18, 2, 36, p. 486 | Quapropter tradunt Sanch. Anacl. Carden. Henriq. et alii,
42 18, 2, 54, p. 493 | communiori Sanch. Spor. Anacl. etc. apud Ferraris7. Caeterum
43 18, 2, 67, p. 501 | probabilius Sanchez Tourn. Anacl. Guttier. etc. contra Habert.
44 18, 2, 69, p. 502 | Pont. Sanch. Boss. Wig. Anacl. etc. contra aliquos pauciores,
45 18, 2, 85, p. 511 | communius dicunt Sanch. Pont. Anacl. Castr. Escob. Conc. Salm.
46 18, 3, 92, p. 516 | tamen cum Sanch. Salm. Cast. Anacl. etc. talem separationem
47 19, 3, 121, p. 571| irregularis (secus si duobus); ita Anacl. Holzm. Caiet. Nav. Tourn.
48 19, 3, 125, p. 571| habent valde enormem; Bus. Anacl. Bon.,e tc. Pigmaei, sive
49 19, 3, 127, p. 572| probabiliter Sanch. Pont. Anacl. Bon. et Salm. cum multis
|