Parte, Capitolo, Capoverso
1 3, 2, 48, p. 68| probabilis, sed in praxi dico cum Holzman, sine dubio esse explicandas
2 3, 2, 51, p. 68| Layman, Azor. Salmant. Holzman, Roncaglia, Croix, etc.
3 3, 2, 63, p. 72| malitiam. Sed probabiliter Holzman sentit, satis esse confiteri
4 5, 2, 15, p. 108| Wig., Laim., Carden., Holzman., Salmant., Tournely, Croix,
5 6, 1, 10, p. 120| Castrop., Ronc., Anacl., Holzman,e tc. dum pingere (modo
6 6, 1, 11, p. 120| Castrop., Filliuc., Sanch., Holzman. etc.6.~
7 6, 1, 33, p. 125| Suar. Lay. Castrop. Sa Holzman Elbel Salmant., etc. etiamsi
8 7, 1, 3, p. 133 | serio, ut dicunt Roncaglia, Holzman, et Sporer) v. g. ne ludant
9 7, 4, 17, p. 138| Castropal. Anacl. Roncag. Barb. Holzman, etc. Alii dicunt esse parvitatem
10 7, 4, 18, p. 139| vero cum Cabass., Bonac., Holzman, quod possit residere in
11 7, 4, 24, p. 141| Azor., Busemb., Salm., Holzman, etc. contra Silvest. et
12 9, 0, 3, p. 179 | pollutionem, merito Bonac. Holzman Croix, etc., contra aliquos,
13 9, 0, 10, p. 180| scandalo gravi. Et etiam merito Holzman et La-Croix propter scandalum
14 9, 0, 21, p. 182| ita Suar. Sanch. Less. Holzman Croix Bonac. Salm. etc.
15 9, 0, 34, p. 185| Bonac. Anacl. Spor. Salm. Holzman et alii plures cum d. Thoma3.
16 9, 0, 34, p. 186| Bonac. Anacl. Salmant. Holzman Elbel etc. non esse obligationem
17 9, 0, 34, p. 186| Bonac. Salm. etc. contra Holzman, Croix etc. Imo valde probabiliter
18 10, 1, 7, p. 189 | Lugo Azor. Cabass. Salmant. Holzman etc. satis esse probabilem,
19 10, 2, 20, p. 193| Suar. Vasq. Coninch. Sanch. Holzman Salmant., etc. quia cum
20 10, 2, 24, p. 195| Contra hoc negant de Lugo et Holzman, dicentes hoc intelligi
21 10, 3, 5, p. 201 | negant Less. Laym. Lugo, Holzman. et Sporer; et dicunt probabile
22 10, 3, 8, p. 202 | Respondetur cum Less. Laym. Holzman, et Viva, quod si qui consilium
23 10, 3, 15, p. 204| furta; ita Bonac. Spor. Holzman, et Salm. licet Salmanticenses
24 10, 3, 55, p. 216| Laym. Sanch. Salm., Ronc. Holzman Sporer, etc. Et eo casu
25 11, Unic, 19, p. 256| Nav. Trullench. Busemb. Holzman etc. cum communi2; modo,
26 12, 1, 2, p. 257 | aut conchilia. Idem dicunt Holzman et Elbel de lutris (vulgo
27 12, 1, 9, p. 260 | obligabat, hodie tamen, ut aiunt Holzman et Roncaglia, postquam ex
28 12, 1, 21, p. 266| Alexand. Sylvius, Azor. Holzman Concina Antoine Cuniliati
29 12, 2, 36, p. 272| antequam finiat annus? Negat Holzman; sed nos affirmamus cum
30 13, 1, 17, p. 283| Sanch. Castrop. Salmant. Holzman, etc.7.~
31 13, 2, 36, p. 290| affirmant Lugo Fill. Vasq. Holzman Anacl. Croix etc.; sed probabilius
32 13, 2, 36, p. 290| affirmant Lugo Fill. Vasq. Holzman Anacl. Croix etc. Et probatur
33 15, 4, 67, p. 357| amovibili; ut dicunt Lugo Ronc. Holzman etc.; et ita declaravit
34 16, 1, 5, p. 370 | Bonac. Castropal. Conc. et Holzman. Et quia haec sententia
35 16, 1, 5, p. 370 | confitentur iidem adversarii Holzman Ronc. etc. Et omnes conveniunt
36 16, 3, 38, p. 386| affirmant Pontius, Carden. Holzman, Stoz. Gomaz et alii. Dicunt
37 18, 1, 8, p. 472 | etc. contra Sanchez Nav. Holzman etc. qui contendunt non
38 19, 2, 21, p. 532| Layman. Sayr. Spor. Castrop. Holzman, etc.7.~
39 19, 2, 56, p. 551| VIII. Dicit autem recte Holzman, inter haereticos habendos
40 20, 3, 64, p. 601| celebrare liceat. Idem scribit Holzman6: Excipiends est praetera
41 20, 3, 64, p. 602| Suarez Laym. Bon. Escob. Holzman. et Elbel cum Pasq., etc.
|