Part, §
1 Int,1 | clear in his message to the members of the last Plenary Session
2 Int,4 | inter-religious dialogue.16 ~The Members of the Plenary, taking as
3 Int,4 | Churches and cultures. The members of the Plenary did not intend
4 1,5 | ecclesial and social life, the members of the Plenary Session wanted
5 1,5 | works of the apostolate, members of Secular Institutes and
6 1,8 | the apostolate with other members of the faithful. By being
7 1,9 | The interventions of the members in the Plenary and the reports
8 2,12| they live. ~The decrease in members in many Institutes and their
9 2,12| is the experience of all members of the Church. ~ ~
10 2,13| now closer to the other members of the People of God with
11 2,13| the holiness of all the members of the Church. ~If in fact
12 2,14| mission is required of all its members. Even if, in the end, according
13 2,14| upon the formation of their members”.49 ~ ~
14 2,17| Every community and all the members of the Institute are called
15 2,19| constructive dialogue. The members of the Plenary are aware
16 2,19| wisdom and dialogue among members of the Institute, among
17 3,24| Spirit and it helps the members of the Institute live concretely
18 3,25| prolonged silent prayer. Members of Secular Institutes, like
19 3,25| there. For missionaries and members of Societies of Apostolic
20 3,30| It is the reality of many members joined in a single body,
21 3,30| decrease in the number of members, have already led to the
22 3,31| greater openness to all other members of the Church. The command
23 3,31| pastoral collaboration. Members of Secular Institutes, lay
24 3,31| clerical, relate to other members of the faithful at the level
25 3,31| these days is that some members of the laity are asking
26 4,41| particularly suitable for members of religious communities.
27 4,45| lay men and women who are members of Secular Institutes hold
|