bold = Main text
   Paragraphgrey = Comment text

 1     2|                                 Darkness could not have had a passion
 2     2|      beginning he said that the Darkness has a longing Passion for
 3     2|         is not natural for this Darkness which is visible, inasmuch
 4     2|  visible, inasmuch as even this Darkness which is visible to us is,
 5     2|       invisible to us. Yet this Darkness certainly flees from before
 6     3|     does Light finally imprison Darkness.~Hear, again, another argument
 7     3|         their scripture. If the Darkness verily longed passionately
 8     3|     desirable and attractive to Darkness, how is there produced from
 9     3|    something which is bitter to Darkness ? For the sweetness of our
10     3|      its midst. [The Prison for Darkness not built from Darkness.]
11     3|         Darkness not built from Darkness.]But if that Prison-house,
12     3|  Prison-house, the tormentor of Darkness, is built up from the Nature
13     3|         Nature of the Domain of Darkness, a Nature cannot torture
14     3|         burn itself. And if the Darkness is tortured by what belongs
15     3|       it is at rest. For if all Darkness altogether with all that
16     4|        Bân, make that Grave for Darkness? Cf. pp. xlvii., lxxv.~But
17     4|    Prison-house is built up for Darkness, how is its enjoyment changed
18     4|   fashioner of the Grave of the Darkness." And how from that one
19     5|     forbid, it is not so—if the Darkness contrived to frame that
20     6|      its beginning, the Sons of Darkness when they ate it—if they
21    11|       says, "hunted the Sons of Darkness he flayed them, and made
22    14|     Sheath-skins of the Sons of Darkness the sky and the earth and
23    14|          P. 14.] Sheath-skin of Darkness proves that Darkness is
24    14|         of Darkness proves that Darkness is mortal too. For a thing
25    15| imprisoned? ~But if the Sons of Darkness were skinned and stretched
26    15|         they give evidence that Darkness, their Father, is also mortal
27    15|       lying Mani, who said that Darkness was skinned, though it has
28    16|     place to receive it; and so Darkness swallows it once more. [
29    21|        22.] For the dawning and darkness are indicated by the Sun.
30    27|          in which the Primitive Darkness, not merely 'seized' that
31    27|         the same nature as that Darkness, and it certainly does not
32    28|     Mingling, how is the turbid Darkness able to handle that pureness
33    28|        no body ? For either the Darkness is 'pure and refined, and
34    31|        which they had none, the Darkness swallowed them and mixed
35    32|     stones for the Grave of the Darkness ? And where is blindness
36    33|                                 Darkness would not leave its natural
37    33|       never be pleasant for the Darkness to depart from its Domain,
38    33|      much more is the Entity of Darkness contented with its natural
39    34|                                 Darkness would be contented only
40    34|     natural Domain. ~For if the Darkness had its own peculiar Domain,9
41    34|    difficult than this is that "Darkness exchanged the Domain of
42    34|      not customary, how did the Darkness come upon the Light, its
43    34|     that [P. 43.] it (i.e., the Darkness) should be positively injured