bold = Main text
   Part,  Paragraphgrey = Comment text

 1     I,      4|     things prove concerning its nature that it is divisible. And
 2     I,      4|         the Light; and here his nature is found to fill all (space),
 3    II,      1|      downwards according to its nature? For so [L. 46.] . . . [
 4    II,      1|  upwards. Above all [the proper nature of its [P. 55.] (i.e., of
 5    II,      3|        a manner contrary to its nature, then that Upper Being must
 6   III        |  Darkness, and if it is (so) by nature, its nature is very deficient
 7   III        |       it is (so) by nature, its nature is very deficient and imperfect,
 8   III        |         the Light is one in its nature, and wherever a man has
 9   III,      1|           namely): Why did that Nature which cannot be swallowed
10   III,      3|        P. 67.] repugnant to his nature ; but if, though he felt
11   III,      4|     Mind could be acquired by a Nature which did not contain it.
12   III,      7|       abodes and . . . in their nature, and do not dare to cross
13   III,      7|      Evil should exist in their Nature and Domains, seeing that
14   III,      7|         due) to Will and not to Nature; how, therefore, did the
15   III,      7|       and moles which come from Nature [stay in their own natural
16   III,      7|       in reality) come from the nature and abode of the Good (World
17   III,      8|      not natural to it? But the nature of both is that the Light
18   III,      8|         the Light, it it is the nature of that which swallows to
19   III,      8|        was their (unchangeable) Nature? If he is one who submitted (?)
20   III,      8|       has he to-day changed the nature of the Darkness that it
21   III,      8|        the Darkness changed its nature, it is unlikely that it
22   III,      8|       those Entities whose true nature it cannot declare. But,
23   III,      8|        let us inquire about the nature of this Darkness, whether
24   III,      8|       there it has an essential Nature. For one Entity cannot be
25   III,      8|         absurdities. And if the nature of the Light around us,
26   III,      9|      was afraid of the truth of Nature, lest it should refute him.
27   III,     10|         bodies -- a thing which nature does not teach. For a man
28   III,     11|       The Body has not the same Nature as Darkness, nor has the
29   III,     11|      nor has the Soul the same, Nature as Light. ~And if this Body
30   III,     11|      are clothed is of the same nature as the Darkness, as they
31   III,     11|         is in us is of the same nature as the Light, when we look
32   III,     12|    bodies as they say (but) the nature of the Sons of the Light
33   III,     12|        lo, they are akin to its nature as they say [L. 46.] [for]
34   III,     12|         that the Darkness has a nature . . . and goes into anything
35   III,     13|        of Light had a composite Nature. ~And, therefore; if the
36   III,     13|   proper to ask concerning this nature, as to how it existed from
37   III,     14|         the Judge." For if that nature is one, how can part of
38   III,     15| covering which is from the evil Nature." nor is the Soul as they
39   III,     15|       i.e., the Body) is from a nature so that it sins . . . it
40   III,     16|      they say [P. 87.] that its nature is from the Good (Being),
41   III,     16|         it shows concerning its nature . . . the Body is . . . (
42   III,     16|            the Body is . . . (a nature) which is evil. Also . . .
43   III,     17|       it (i.e., the Light) is a nature which pleases him, as the
44   III,     17|          But that that Luminous Nature should become at one time
45   III,     17| associates two Natures with the Nature, that is to say, so that
46   III,     18|      tormented by that Luminous Nature in which it takes pleasure,
47   III,     18|        in it? If its 'Essential nature' has this strength, then