IntraText Table of Contents | Words: Alphabetical - Frequency - Inverse - Length - Statistics | Help | IntraText Library |
| Alphabetical [« »] current 1 dare 1 dark 1 darkness 118 daughter 1 day 1 daytime 1 | Frequency [« »] 130 a 126 he 123 not 118 darkness 114 for 96 was 95 are | St. Ephraim Third to Hypatius against the Teachings Concordances darkness |
bold = Main text
Part, Paragraphgrey = Comment text1 II, 1| without measure, will the Darkness be which exists more heavily 2 II, 1| beneath all ... [how did the Darkness] go up from them because 3 II, 1| its [P. 55.] (i.e., of the Darkness) heaviness, demands that 4 II, 1| the great distance to the Darkness beneath or to reach] the 5 II, 5| everything and above the Darkness -- who supports all these? 6 II, 5| all these? Or how does the Darkness, which is beneath [P. 58, 7 II, 6| Entities, especially as the Darkness also is found to exist likewise 8 III | World in contact with the Darkness, and thereby introduced 9 III | Light reach the Senses of Darkness? ~And, therefore, on these 10 III | its side which is near the Darkness, it is limited by the Darkness, 11 III | Darkness, it is limited by the Darkness, and if it is (so) by nature, 12 III | thing which is fair but the Darkness. Now, in the case of a thing 13 III | which is limited by the Darkness, or perfect Light that which 14 III | which is bounded by the Darkness? For it (i.e., the Darkness) 15 III | Darkness? For it (i.e., the Darkness) confined and limited its 16 III | fact that it (i.e., the Darkness) waxed bold like a strong 17 III | they say that it (i.e., the Darkness) came as one in need ; but 18 III | corrupted by the contact of the Darkness. And if they say that that 19 III | side which bordered on the Darkness was not injured by the contact 20 III | contact of the [P. 62.] Darkness, then that side which could 21 III | injured by the contact of the Darkness, for it (i.e., the Darkness) 22 III | Darkness, for it (i.e., the Darkness) is said to have acquired 23 III | contact with the corrupt Darkness from everlasting to everlasting, 24 III | Frontier into the jaws of the Darkness? For it has been said that 25 III | it has been said that the Darkness could not even cross that 26 III | injured by the contact of the Darkness. And if the Darkness had 27 III | the Darkness. And if the Darkness had been able to get dominion 28 III | its will into action, the Darkness had no need to make an Assault 29 III | Light is in contact with the Darkness, as they say. If it is after 30 III | bordered on the Sons of the Darkness was entirely akin to the 31 III | was entirely akin to the Darkness -- for it is with them. 32 III | Fragrance ever smite the Darkness? ~ 33 III, 1| If Darkness has foreknowledge it is 34 III, 1| than the Light. ~For if the Darkness had foreknowledge, and by 35 III, 1| then is that Entity (of the Darkness) greater and more excellent 36 III, 1| the Souls escape from this Darkness?] And if he had great foreknowledge, 37 III, 1| muttered from the midst of the Darkness when he was swallowed. And 38 III, 1| not contend (?) with the Darkness and swallow all of it?~ 39 III, 2| about the contact of the Darkness with the Light]. [Cf. p. 40 III, 3| If Darkness had foreledge, he showed 41 III, 4| How did Darkness discover this Light? ~And 42 III, 4| show how at one time the Darkness had a Passion for the Light, 43 III, 4| trouble and war. But if the Darkness acquired Thought which . . . , 44 III, 4| from a region above the Darkness].~ 45 III, 5| Mani said, concerning the Darkness . . . [that its Sons began 46 III, 5| was above them outside the Darkness or that it acquired Thought].~ 47 III, 6| near together, how did the Darkness recently desire the Light, 48 III, 7| How did the Darkness love the Light? ~For with 49 III, 7| opponent and the abolisher of Darkness whenever it suits them, 50 III, 7| they say that it (i.e., the Darkness) had a Passion for it (i.e., 51 III, 7| good reason to desire the Darkness (which is) like a wolf! 52 III, 7| if they suppose that the Darkness is injured like the lamb, 53 III, 7| injurer? They attribute to Darkness that it desires, like the 54 III, 7| laid at the door of the Darkness, has not the true (opinion) 55 III, 7| moles which dwell in the Darkness as the likeness of the Sons 56 III, 7| likeness of the Sons of Darkness, and let us place the fine 57 III, 7| how, therefore, did the Darkness . . . to cross to the Domain 58 III, 7| Moles akin to the Darkness are not anxious to cross 59 III, 7| the Light; and (yet) the Darkness, their Father, made an Assault 60 III, 7| the vile boundary of the Darkness.~ 61 III, 8| How could Darkness swallow Light? ~Again, let 62 III, 8| mouths of the Sons of the Darkness? And how did the Darkness 63 III, 8| Darkness? And how did the Darkness swallow the Light -- a thing 64 III, 8| the Light swallows and the Darkness is swallowed. And if here ( 65 III, 8| 76.] Light swallows the Darkness as experience shows, but 66 III, 8| say, it is clear that this Darkness which is swallowed here 67 III, 8| here is not akin to that Darkness which swallows there ; just 68 III, 8| Light which swallows the Darkness is not akin to that which 69 III, 8| which is swallowed by the Darkness. And if they strive to make 70 III, 8| Light which swallows the Darkness here with us, and this Darkness 71 III, 8| Darkness here with us, and this Darkness which here amongst us is 72 III, 8| Light was swallowed by the Darkness, how has he to-day changed 73 III, 8| changed the nature of the Darkness that it should be swallowed 74 III, 8| is the Maker. And, if the Darkness changed its nature, it is 75 III, 8| about the nature of this Darkness, whether this is natural 76 III, 8| that [P. 78.] it (i.e., the Darkness), too, is swallowed here 77 III, 8| whereby Light is swallowed by Darkness, at any time and for all 78 III, 8| that as it swallows the Darkness here, so it swallows there, 79 III, 8| was not swallowed (by the Darkness).~ 80 III, 9| concerning the Light and the Darkness . . . we hear that it was 81 III, 9| that the Light swallows the Darkness here, they think that there 82 III, 9| Light) is swallowed by the Darkness?~ 83 III, 10| The Light and Darkness have no bodies. ~And the 84 III, 10| have no bodies. ~And the Darkness when it is swallowed here 85 III, 10| separated from itself (i.e., the Darkness), seeing that it vanishes 86 III, 10| altogether. But a house full of darkness shows that if a man opens 87 III, 10| daytime, whither can that darkness, which is in it, go up [ 88 III, 10| which says that it (i.e., Darkness) has a kind of body in reality. 89 III, 10| cast into its mouth." So Darkness and Light have become composite 90 III, 10| Light nor ever swallows Darkness.~ 91 III, 11| has not the same Nature as Darkness, nor has the Soul the same, 92 III, 11| of the same nature as the Darkness, as they say, and this Soul 93 III, 11| two (natures) of Light and Darkness which are outside of us, 94 III, 11| Body which is akin to the Darkness? For the outer Light which 95 III, 11| the Soul) overcomes the Darkness. Moreover, how does this 96 III, 11| seeing that this outer Darkness which is akin to it is consumed 97 III, 12| to catch the Sons of Darkness. ~And as for these things 98 III, 12| mouths of the Sons of the Darkness as (into the mouths) of 99 III, 12| sweet to those Sons of the Darkness; and thus they were found 100 III, 12| if ... the Sons of the Darkness are bodies because (they [ 101 III, 12| which is mingled (with the Darkness) should be held fast? And 102 III, 12| the Soul was akin to the Darkness . . . this [Ll. 38, 41.] [ 103 III, 12| say [L. 46.] [for] that Darkness . . . and as the wise ones 104 III, 12| Darkness by the Primal [Man] who 105 III, 12| 18,19.] teach that the Darkness has a nature . . . and goes 106 III, 13| L. 37.] [that as] the Darkness ate the Light . . . which 107 III, 13| and it was all inside the Darkness . . . how did it eternally 108 III, 16| of the Light puts on that Darkness in its deeds and . . . in 109 III, 17| pleased finally torture Darkness? ~And if all this was pleasant 110 III, 17| assigned to the realm of the Darkness when he is tortured." And 111 III, 17| and that he (i.e., the Darkness) should be imprisoned and 112 III, 18| Domains? ~If, therefore, the Darkness is finally tormented by 113 III, 18| brought it about) that the Darkness obtained dominion over all 114 III, 18| fierceness so that at last the Darkness is imprisoned and tormented 115 III, 18| now built stupidly for the Darkness, an impregnable wall should 116 III, 18| those atrocities which the Darkness wrought [Cf. p. XXXV.] upon 117 III, 18| to build a Grave for the Darkness so that at last it may be 118 III, 18| is infinite? For if the Darkness can be limited, then the