bold = Main text
   Paragraphgrey = Comment text

 1     1|     essentially belonging to his nature something which is harder
 2     2|        the fire), transforms the nature thereof. And if any one
 3     3|          be cut. For a composite nature can be dissolved. But if
 4     3|         these (qualities) in its nature, it has no (immutable) Essence
 5     3|        immutable) Essence in its nature, and it shows that the natures
 6     3|      that it also is a composite nature. ~
 7     4|    Darkness. And if it has not a nature to remain in a Domain which
 8     4|          which is foreign to its nature? ~
 9     5|      luminous, because its fixed nature will not allow it. For it
10     9|       Domain, and . . . also its nature . . .? [L. 28.] ~
11    10|     which touch one another, the nature of the Sun has no [gross
12    10|      Moreover, a Shadow is not a nature (in) itself. For it is the
13    11|                           If the nature of Light and Darkness is
14    11|        thing (as this Light) the nature of which is to scatter its
15    11|          Darkness) has no (such) nature? And the Light which ought
16    13|        to say, that the Luminous Nature of the Soul is created (
17    14|   opposite ; but, concerning its nature, he declared that it is
18    14|        which is akin to them, as nature shows from which they bring
19    15|      words or in writings. For a nature is changed into everything
20    16|       Natures does its consuming nature come? If it is from the
21    16|        body which is akin to its nature? And if it injures its nature,
22    16|    nature? And if it injures its nature, it would be right that
23    16|      injure itself also, if that nature which springs from it is
24    16|      which springs from the good Nature does not recognize the good,
25    17|       dwelling may not cause his nature to sink, (this dwelling)
26    20|         to account for the fixed nature of animals. ~We turn, again,
27    20|     mixed in it some of the Good Nature which is scattered through
28    20|      gave] to creatures a 'bound Nature' so that creatures [have
29    21|         Light has an independent nature -- if from two natures which
30    23|          Sun comes from the Good Nature, why does it hurt the eye? ~
31    23|        injures is from the Evil (Nature), just as everything which
32    23|          helps is from the Good (Nature). And they say concerning
33    24|          of it (and) akin to the nature of the Light harmed by the
34    25|      different. ~And what is the nature of all of this harmful (
35    26|        an [P. 113, l.9] eloquent Nature, why are they not all eloquent
36    26|        not all eloquent like the Nature from which they come? ~
37    29|          are from that Effulgent Nature, why have they not the Radiance
38    30|       there is one head (?), the nature of Light, as they say. Why,
39    30|        is cunning . . . the Good Nature . . . So also at all times
40    30| simplicity of that [L. 43.] Good Nature has been conquered, and
41    30|        this cunning of that evil Nature. For it has both power and [
42    30|         inclination towards that Nature whose Parts are numerous
43    32|         And how is that a single Nature, part of which is conquered
44    35|        But they suppose that its nature (?) is from Evil, and its