IntraText Table of Contents | Words: Alphabetical - Frequency - Inverse - Length - Statistics | Help | IntraText Library | Search |
Alphabetical [« »] 1914 1 197 1 1arqhti 1 2 115 20 12 200 1 204 1 | Frequency [« »] 132 such 131 would 121 into 115 2 115 its 114 world 113 chapter | Macarius Magnes Apocriticus Concordances 2 |
bold = Main text Book, Chapter grey = Comment text
1 Int (6) | 2 Turrianus, Dogmaticus de 2 Int (8) | 2 See p. 31.~ ~ 3 Int (10) | 2 See Migne, Patr, Graec. 4 Int (13) | Lactantius, Div. Instit. v. 2.~ ~ 5 Int (14) | 2 Möller, Schürers Theol. 6 Int (17) | 2 J.T.S. April and July 1914 ( 7 Int (20) | 1 See p. 95, n. 2.~ ~ 8 Int (21) | 2 Corpus Inscript. Lat. t. 9 Int (23) | 2 Euseb., In Hieroclem, in 10 Int (25) | xxii. pp. 797-800, ch. 2. ~ ~ 11 Int (28) | 2 Lactantius, De Mortibus 12 Int, 5 | the Christian era. |18~ ~2. In the other direction 13 Int (32) | 2 Ibid. iv. 13.~ ~ 14 Int (36) | 2 Rufinus, Comment, in Symb. 15 Int (41) | 2 Apocr. iii. 16, p. 96, and 16 Int (45) | 2 Apocr. iii. 40, p. 138, 17 Int (53) | 2 His outlook is more Alexandrian 18 Int (56) | 2 Patrologie, 1894, p. 550. ~ ~ 19 Int (57) | Lactantius, Div. Instit. v. 2.~ ~ 20 Int, 8 | Gospels, Acts, Romans, 1 and 2 Corinthians, Galatians, 21 Int, 8 | Deuteronomy, Joshua, 1 and 2 Kings, Job, the Psalms, 22 Int (59) | 2 M. R. James, Two Lectures 23 Int, 8 | Gospels, Acts, Romans, 1 and 2 Corinthians, Ephesians, 24 Int, 8 | Macarius shows a knowledge of 2 Peter, but it is strange 25 Int, 8 | the obvious parallel from 2 Peter iii. 12, and chooses 26 Int (60) | 12, p. 174, and refers to 2 Esdras xiv. 21-25~ ~ 27 Int (62) | 2 See Burkitt, Evangelion 28 Int (67) | 2 J.T.S. of July 1907, pp. 29 I (72) | 2 All the other records, viz. 30 II (78) | 2 With the reference to Antioch, 31 II (85) | 2 Reading e0nedoi/asaj instead 32 II (88) | 2 Reading a0gaqo&j instead 33 II (90) | 2 paraqh&somai, as some MSS. ~ ~ 34 II (94) | 2 Reading u9poge/iwn instead 35 II (96) | 2 Blondel here suspects the 36 II (99) | 2 This is a literal translation 37 II (101)| 2 The argument varies strangely 38 II (103)| 2 Man is termed o9 ko&smoj 39 II (106)| 2 antiqe/uj.~ ~ 40 III (108)| 2 The style of the questions 41 III, VIII | without honour " (Isa. liii. 2); and again, "a man smitten, 42 III (111)| 2 kata_ kri/sin.~ ~ 43 III (113)| 2 kerai/aj. ~ ~ 44 III (117)| 2 o9 dokw~n peponqe/nai. This 45 III (122)| 2 Or, Ogygian.~ ~ 46 III (126)| 2 Such passages are quoted 47 III (128)| 2 It seems best to read this 48 III (132)| 2 Viz "human nature," as he 49 III (136)| 2 sedeton. MS. sedeqron, evidently 50 III (140)| 2 There is a gap in the MS., 51 III (142)| 2 The word is a technical 52 III (146)| 2 skhnh_n sesofisme/nhn.~ ~ 53 III (150)| 2 a3pacaplw~j to_n a1nqrwpon 54 III (152)| 2 Monogenh&j, the alternative 55 III (154)| 2 The following paragraph 56 III (158)| 2 The MS omits the words for " 57 III (163)| 2 i. e. Baptism. ~ ~ 58 III (168)| 2 Reading Ti/ ga&r in place 59 III (173)| 2 In thus laying stress on 60 III (175)| 2 See note on the earlier 61 III (177)| 2 It is at this point that 62 III (179)| 2 The quotation, as often, 63 III, XXII | about him (Gal. ii. 12 and 2 Cor. xi. 13).~ ~This man 64 III (181)| 2 This is mentioned again 65 III, XXII | 5). And then185 he adds (2 Cor. xi. 13), "For such 66 III (185)| 2 It is strangely unfair thus 67 III (187)| 2 He misses the chance of 68 III (190)| 2 Phil. iii. 2, i.e. a mere 69 III (190)| 2 Phil. iii. 2, i.e. a mere meaningless 70 III (192)| Macarius (ch. xxix. p. 122, 1. 2, kai/per kaqhkeu&wn toi~ 71 III (195)| 2 After all, he only deals 72 III, XXXVII | inflamed with the trouble196 (2 Cor. xi. 29); sometimes | 73 III (198)| 2 He omits the words, "In 74 III (201)| 2 lit. " Festering beneath 75 III (205)| 2 No answer is here given 76 III (208)| 2 He chooses the example given 77 III (210)| 2 This is evidently a slip, 78 III (214)| 2 The full translation of 79 III (217)| 2 i1ulci of the MS. must be 80 III (220)| 2 For this see Euseb., Praepar. 81 III (224)| 2 I Tim. iv. 2. This is the 82 III (224)| 2 I Tim. iv. 2. This is the passage quoted 83 III (224)| in the objection, but v. 2 was then omitted, and only 84 III (228)| 2 He is referring to the further 85 III (234)| 2 If su_n eu0marei/a| tou~ 86 IV (236)| 2 Possibly this is a reminiscence 87 IV (238)| 2 He is quoting the verses 88 IV (242)| 2 The obvious reference seems 89 IV (245)| 2 He does not intend to substitute 90 IV, XII | round about him" (Ps. xcvii. 2), where His judgment-seat 91 IV (249)| 2 It is very remarkable that, 92 IV (252)| 2 These are also referred 93 IV (253)| probably a reference to 2 Peter iii. 8, but not necessarily 94 IV (253)| elsewhere Macarius ignores 2 Peter when its use was to 95 IV (255)| 2 In iii. 22 he uses similar 96 IV (257)| 2 Apollonius of Tyana is here 97 IV (259)| 2 Harnack has used this as 98 IV (265)| 2 He seems to think he is 99 IV (270)| 2 With this cursory mention 100 IV (273)| 2 This excellent passage well 101 IV, XVI | in men and walk in them (2 Cor. vi. 16, from Lev. xxvi. 102 IV (278)| 2 Eng. Vers. " The secret 103 IV (280)| 2 A reference to the Pythagoreans.~ ~ 104 IV (285)| 2 It is only here that Macarius 105 IV (288)| 2 It is to be noted that he 106 IV (291)| 2 The word Monarchia ( monarxi/ 107 IV (294)| 2 qe&sei, in contrast with 108 IV (296)| 2 An ancient reader was unable 109 IV (299)| 2 This statement has been 110 IV (302)| 2 Nicephorus is answering 111 IV (307)| 2 He here continues the thoughts 112 IV, XXX | reckoned as one brief day (cf. 2 Peter iii. 8),315 and again 113 IV (314)| 2 An unexpected word; perhaps 114 IV (317)| 2 dia_ to_n xarakth~ra.~ ~ 115 V (322)| 2 Turrianus gives fa&blwn,