IntraText Table of Contents | Words: Alphabetical - Frequency - Inverse - Length - Statistics | Help | IntraText Library | Search |
| Alphabetical [« »] 29 8 290 1 292 1 3 71 30 5 300 4 303 2 | Frequency [« »] 75 paul 75 see 73 more 71 3 71 again 71 also 71 shall | Macarius Magnes Apocriticus Concordances 3 |
bold = Main text Book, Chapter grey = Comment text
1 Int (9) | Magdeburgenses, Colon. 1573, ii. 3, p. 165; i. 5, p. 21, and 2 Int (11) | 3 Macarii Magnetis quae supersunt, 3 Int (15) | 3 See J.T.S. of April 1907 ( 4 Int (16) | griechischen Philosophen der 3 Jahrhunderts, etc. (Texte 5 Int (18) | 3 Georg Schalkhausser, Zu 6 Int (21) | Corpus Inscript. Lat. t. 3, No. 133, ap. Duch. p. 20.~ ~ 7 Int (24) | 3 Div. Instit. v. 3.~ ~ 8 Int (24) | 3 Div. Instit. v. 3.~ ~ 9 Int (29) | 3 See e.g. Apocr. ii. 12, 10 Int (30) | 4 Apocr. iv. 3, p. 160, l. 6, and iv. 5, 11 Int, 5 | in the year A.D. 292.~ ~3. Macarius gives a short 12 Int (33) | 3 Ibid. iv. 25 : i3na triw~ 13 Int (37) | 3 Holl., Amphil. p. 91 et 14 Int (42) | 3 Nic., op. cit., stolh_n 15 Int (46) | 3 Ibid. v. 15, and iii. 43, 16 Int (57) | 3 Lactantius, Div. Instit. 17 Int (60) | 3 Of Apocryphal books, Macarius 18 Int (63) | 3 Apocr. iv. 15, pp. 126 and 19 Int (68) | 3 See J.T.S. of Jufy 1907, 20 I (73) | 3 kato&rqwma, one of the favourite 21 II (79) | 3 The contrast is expressed 22 II (86) | 3 " Literally, good by nature ( 23 II (91) | 3 w0nei/disa&j; This is the 24 II (97) | 3 There is a play on the words 25 III (114)| 3 See note on iii. 1.~ ~ 26 III (118)| 3 The MS. gives ti/ ga_r mei~ 27 III (123)| 3 Job xli. 1 : "Canst them 28 III, X | from Jerusalem" (Isa. ii. 3); and "Therefore the Lord 29 III (129)| 3 Blondel suggests th~j e0nori/ 30 III (133)| 3 This explanation has been 31 III (143)| 3 The word e9sti/a signifies 32 III (147)| 10 p.m. instead of after 3 a.m. This is a somewhat 33 III, XXIII | of the words (Ezek. iii. 3), and the bitterness of 34 III (164)| 3 The use of the singular 35 III (169)| 3 As a matter of fact, the 36 III (182)| 3 This seems to have been 37 III (188)| 3 The text adds the curious 38 III, XXX | circumcising of Timothy (Acts xvi. 3).~ ~He remained a little 39 III, XXX | the Apostles (Acts xvi. 3). Oh, the downright stupidity 40 III (191)| 3 Gk. parapa&llion.~ ~ 41 III (196)| 3 The words tw~| po&nw| purou& 42 III, XXXI | to be a Jew (Acts xxii. 3) and a Roman (Acts xxii. 43 III (199)| 3 Surely this is a slip for " 44 III (202)| 3 Such is the strangely inadequate 45 III, XXXIII | condemning it in Gal. v. 3 and iii. 10, and approving 46 III, XXXIII | the whole law" (Gal. v. 3). This is instead of saying 47 III (206)| 3 This is quite different 48 III (211)| 3 This correct translation 49 III (215)| 3 The answer at once makes 50 III (218)| 3 sfazome/nwn is the addition 51 III (221)| 3 eu0age/steron—perhaps "purer."~ ~ 52 III, XXXVI | meats" (1 Tim. iv. 1 and 3). And in the Epistle to 53 III (224)| omitted, and only vv. 1 and 3 given. ( a0nasth&suntai 54 III (225)| 3 Our apologist is on the 55 III (228)| further words of I Tim. iv. 3, "abstaining from meats," 56 III (229)| 3 The followers of Manes are 57 IV (239)| 3 dhmiourgo&j, a familiar 58 IV (243)| 3 This is a very natural touch, 59 IV, XII | the Gospel (cf. Ps. civ. 3). Also the Gospel says, " 60 IV (250)| 3 The previous objection has 61 IV (253)| 3 This is probably a reference 62 IV (260)| 3 The Syrian Gnostic, who 63 IV (266)| 3 This is a misquotation for " 64 IV (271)| 3 e9auto_n a0poqeoi~ koinwnw~ 65 IV (274)| 3 This is in accordance with 66 IV (289)| see Introd., p. xviii. n. 3, and p. 155 n. 1. The theory 67 IV (292)| 3 e0c ei0k&noj h9mi~n . . . 68 IV (297)| 3 Blondel gives Qeo&j, not 69 IV (300)| 3 tou~ kuri/on is an addition 70 IV (308)| 3 There is a play on words 71 IV (315)| 1 See p. 125, n. 3.~ ~