bold = Main text
   Book, Chapter        grey = Comment text

 1   Int,        2     |         professor, believed his opponent to be none other than Porphyry
 2   Int,        3     |         and 350. Concerning his opponent he makes the brilliant suggestion
 3   Int,        3     |       answers have referred his opponent to Porphyry's book De Abstinentia
 4   Int,        4     |          but when he points his opponent to the effects of the faith,
 5   Int,        5     |   trembling attitude before his opponent, and need to brace himself
 6   Int,        6     |         been a bishop. When his opponent says that, if to "drink
 7   Int,        6     |         stated,44 he points his opponent to the East, and particularly
 8   Int,        6     |       to those mentioned by his opponent.48 When he mentions the
 9   Int,        6     |       no attempt to connect his opponent with Syria, and only refers
10   Int,        6     |       Polycarp of Smyrna. As an opponent of Origenism, he would not
11   Int,        7     |      Greeks. If we consider the opponent's book to have been "Philalethes,
12   Int,        7     |       directed against a single opponent.58~ ~
13   Int,       10     | Virgin-birth is regarded by his opponent as well as himself as an
14   Int,       10     |       his readiness to meet his opponent on his own ground, and an
15   Int,       10     |         pagan objections of his opponent, which have a special value
16    II          (77) |        it is a reference to his opponent's connexion with it, see
17    II          (101)|   reading, and argues, like his opponent, from both.~ ~
18   III               |  contest which our much-admired opponent prepared for us, after bringing
19   III          (109)|         19. See p. 55. That his opponent regarded him as a hero is
20   III          (130)|         the same mistake as his opponent, without seeming to discover
21   III          (139)|          1 Macarius follows his opponent in omitting the word "eye."
22   III          (171)|        xxvii. The fact that his opponent again alludes to the saying
23   III          (171)|         passing over one of his opponent's points.~ ~
24   III          (172)|       echoes the word which his opponent had used at the beginning
25   III          (176)|        another objection of his opponent, as contained in chapter
26   III          (177)|        seq.) considers that the opponent's work was here divided
27   III          (178)|         does he answer what his opponent had said about the injunction
28   III          (180)|                           1 The opponent here shows considerable
29   III          (204)|    thereof?" was omitted by his opponent from I Cor. ix. 7, but here
30    IV               |        the judgment of my Greek opponent, and we had made clear the
31    IV          (242)|        of recent history to the opponent of Macarius, if he dates
32    IV          (302)|      would not be answering his opponent if they referred to Christian
33    IV          (310)|       carnis." And although his opponent calls it "the resurrection